From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: stable@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] eal/x86: fix some CPU extended features definitions
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 14:07:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211008120715.17810-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211006192008.23369-1-david.marchand@redhat.com>
Caught while checking CPUID related stuff in OVS.
According to [1], for Structured Extended Feature Flags Enumeration Leaf
(EAX = 0x07H, ECX = 0):
- BMI1 is associated to EBX, bit 3 (was incorrectly 2),
- SMEP is associated to EBX, bit 7 (was incorrectly 6),
- BMI2 is associated to EBX, bit 8 (was incorrectly 7),
- ERMS is associated to EBX, bit 9 (was incorrectly 8),
1: https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/c5/15/architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference.pdf
Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
---
lib/eal/x86/rte_cpuflags.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/eal/x86/rte_cpuflags.c b/lib/eal/x86/rte_cpuflags.c
index d339734a8c..378fc95396 100644
--- a/lib/eal/x86/rte_cpuflags.c
+++ b/lib/eal/x86/rte_cpuflags.c
@@ -100,12 +100,12 @@ const struct feature_entry rte_cpu_feature_table[] = {
FEAT_DEF(ENERGY_EFF, 0x00000006, 0, RTE_REG_ECX, 3)
FEAT_DEF(FSGSBASE, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 0)
- FEAT_DEF(BMI1, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 2)
+ FEAT_DEF(BMI1, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 3)
FEAT_DEF(HLE, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 4)
FEAT_DEF(AVX2, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 5)
- FEAT_DEF(SMEP, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 6)
- FEAT_DEF(BMI2, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 7)
- FEAT_DEF(ERMS, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 8)
+ FEAT_DEF(SMEP, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 7)
+ FEAT_DEF(BMI2, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 8)
+ FEAT_DEF(ERMS, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 9)
FEAT_DEF(INVPCID, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 10)
FEAT_DEF(RTM, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 11)
FEAT_DEF(AVX512F, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 16)
--
2.23.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-08 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-06 19:20 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/x86: fix some CPU extended features David Marchand
2021-10-08 10:15 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-10-08 11:08 ` David Marchand
2021-10-08 12:07 ` David Marchand [this message]
2021-10-08 12:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] eal/x86: sort CPU extended features definitions David Marchand
2021-10-12 19:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 1/2] eal/x86: fix some " David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211008120715.17810-1-david.marchand@redhat.com \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).