From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC138A0C4D;
	Tue,  2 Nov 2021 00:19:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCAC4068F;
	Tue,  2 Nov 2021 00:19:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-pl1-f170.google.com (mail-pl1-f170.google.com
 [209.85.214.170])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5844068E
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  2 Nov 2021 00:19:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pl1-f170.google.com with SMTP id v20so13078769plo.7
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 16:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=networkplumber-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112;
 h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=dl39gxEPLknDPoD49S5OzDpX5++lChdEH7GJTHOGcgM=;
 b=I0awXmLa6IGVUORCi2mrH0Qw6Fo3dAQ6EwfdINzVXz46q5Uyg8wr6oq8x9YD0C1ayi
 WwZaIeY8Cvg7cgJbGvRsoWGYI9ICiWTrZzrTu27LtuQaqJUX4776vHkw4I3qoF5qclCR
 9mX8ZmkUY+GZl3NXtYPBFmlKYCdxIIX1FRdI9+lny86OD0eI6gVrcPLFIl/+uykbIDIc
 02+bIRxlmiQiTzjyQ4Lr8Qi3t+gYVob+EHPk7QoUYveeNOvEuHPD9LXQK94tJllwzq6A
 BTldx4k+ZIfK1H5sqYqjwDsKDmk4IKsiHFG+UIXItjq0/lsNlgy/p7VBJo2hNxmv00A2
 UfhQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
 :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=dl39gxEPLknDPoD49S5OzDpX5++lChdEH7GJTHOGcgM=;
 b=F2EaUyEQ1/nnCLBnpwPn0YUE0rqG5p7xlnV+FkIn0iSgnW9/BViXtc9GtJ2cg8gAWK
 jwLZeyNPH405fJAMqPTgD9cApcARi+6sGeYJ92/Z5NlpS4rE4VHZLABgkgiGKIAmjLKe
 970urXtmSaKW6OQyar+HOJazTTwG3PmHh+JMbhIVFzx5nXNpTMYKlIDr7APspesEqw/C
 ugDAGSl88FKkG68NmD6Zj0tqMPf04z0L5I3aQqFWRJkQdjyo9ZzS2bsMd8khztSa9kvQ
 K5EEEkPlEvgZysTd9sBYPw9mnMAR2jH3zS8zthsqpFBHv9J+LsX2CMLAb0/SL1UBcNY8
 Ej9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533JBJYE5ucrDHFqi3u40RdIlQRcEGW+AzzW3IMtKVigvh9D5+N+
 dpXEZdnQPuq77H9QrEbHJ3xhPwHlBEZQBw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxlUgo8rguXpZDOVinaxssnTx6NEjT3gonj3H0VkRZCG5ICnTgRkdM/ZJzB5I1P9CSxFCjBLA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:9907:: with SMTP id
 b7mr2325840pjp.82.1635808747190; 
 Mon, 01 Nov 2021 16:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.local (204-195-33-123.wavecable.com. [204.195.33.123])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id mn15sm444852pjb.35.2021.11.01.16.19.06
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Mon, 01 Nov 2021 16:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 16:19:04 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, dev@dpdk.org
Message-ID: <20211101161904.49e4da0d@hermes.local>
In-Reply-To: <20211101133533.3402007-2-ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
References: <20211101133533.3402007-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
 <20211101133533.3402007-2-ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] devtools: disable fixes authors in get
 maintainers
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Mon,  1 Nov 2021 13:35:33 +0000
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:

> 'get_maintainer.pl' by default returns authors that has fixes in
> relevant code, to reduce the output only maintainers from MAINTAINERS
> file, disabling fixes authors, by making '--no-fixes' default.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>

Isn't it better to send to more people on patches rather than less.
There could be cases where a patch reverts a change and the original
author never gets notified after this.

Could you give an example?