From: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: bruce.richardson@intel.com, thomas@monjalon.net,
david.marchand@redhat.com, David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] eal: add additional info if core mask too long
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 14:32:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211103143229.34503-2-david.hunt@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211103143229.34503-1-david.hunt@intel.com>
If the user requests to use an lcore above 128 using -c,
the eal will exit with "EAL: invalid coremask syntax" and
very little else useful information.
This patch adds some extra information suggesting to use --lcores
so that physical cores above RTE_MAX_LCORE (default 128) can be
used. This is achieved by using the --lcores option by mapping
the logical cores in the application to physical cores.
For example, if "-c 0x300000000000000000000000000000000" is
used, we see the following additional output on the command line:
EAL: lcore 128 >= RTE_MAX_LCORE (128)
EAL: lcore 129 >= RTE_MAX_LCORE (128)
EAL: to use high physical core ids , please use --lcores to
map them to lcore ids below RTE_MAX_LCORE,
EAL: e.g. --lcores 0@128,1@129
Signed-off-by: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
---
changes in v6
* Fixed typo (gto -> got).
* Removed dead code for which the intention was to check for 0 at
the start of the coremask. Also now means that '0xf' is now as
valid coremask (previously needed to be '0x0f').
changes in v5
* replaced strdup and frees with a const char *, as we
just need to keep track of original pointer location.
* reverted err: usage to return -1, as no free() needed.
* other minod code cleanups.
changes in v4
* fixed buffer overrun in populating lcore array.
* switched from strlcpy to strdup due to a clang error.
changes in v3
* added this patch to the set. Addresses the changes for
the -c option.
---
lib/eal/common/eal_common_options.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/eal/common/eal_common_options.c b/lib/eal/common/eal_common_options.c
index c35798b288..0fe3220892 100644
--- a/lib/eal/common/eal_common_options.c
+++ b/lib/eal/common/eal_common_options.c
@@ -750,10 +750,12 @@ check_core_list(int *lcores, unsigned int count)
static int
eal_parse_coremask(const char *coremask, int *cores)
{
- unsigned count = 0;
+ unsigned int count = 0;
int i, j, idx;
int val;
char c;
+ int lcores[RTE_MAX_LCORE];
+ const char *coremask_orig = coremask;
for (idx = 0; idx < RTE_MAX_LCORE; idx++)
cores[idx] = -1;
@@ -770,29 +772,54 @@ eal_parse_coremask(const char *coremask, int *cores)
i = strlen(coremask);
while ((i > 0) && isblank(coremask[i - 1]))
i--;
- if (i == 0)
+ if (i == 0) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "No lcores in coremask: [%s]\n",
+ coremask_orig);
return -1;
+ }
- for (i = i - 1; i >= 0 && idx < RTE_MAX_LCORE; i--) {
+ for (i = i - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
c = coremask[i];
if (isxdigit(c) == 0) {
/* invalid characters */
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "invalid characters in coremask: [%s]\n",
+ coremask_orig);
return -1;
}
val = xdigit2val(c);
- for (j = 0; j < BITS_PER_HEX && idx < RTE_MAX_LCORE; j++, idx++)
+ for (j = 0; j < BITS_PER_HEX; j++, idx++)
{
if ((1 << j) & val) {
- cores[idx] = count;
+ if (count >= RTE_MAX_LCORE) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Too many lcores provided. Cannot exceed %d\n",
+ RTE_MAX_LCORE);
+ return -1;
+ }
+ lcores[count] = idx;
count++;
}
}
}
- for (; i >= 0; i--)
- if (coremask[i] != '0')
- return -1;
- if (count == 0)
+ if (count == 0) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "No lcores in coremask: [%s]\n",
+ coremask_orig);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ if (check_core_list(lcores, count))
return -1;
+
+ /*
+ * Now that we've got a list of cores no longer than
+ * RTE_MAX_LCORE, and no lcore in that list is greater
+ * than RTE_MAX_LCORE, populate the cores
+ * array and return.
+ */
+ do {
+ count--;
+ cores[lcores[count]] = count;
+ } while (count != 0);
+
return 0;
}
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-03 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-09 13:45 [dpdk-dev] build: Increase the default value of RTE_MAX_LCORE David Hunt
2021-09-09 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/6] build: increase default of max lcores to 512 David Hunt
2021-09-09 14:37 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-09-10 6:51 ` David Marchand
2021-09-10 7:54 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-09-10 8:06 ` David Marchand
2021-09-10 8:24 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-09-14 9:34 ` David Hunt
2021-09-14 10:00 ` David Marchand
2021-09-14 11:07 ` David Hunt
2021-09-14 11:29 ` David Marchand
2021-09-15 12:13 ` David Hunt
2021-11-17 15:55 ` Morten Brørup
2021-11-17 19:01 ` David Hunt
2021-09-15 12:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: add additional info if lcore exceeds max cores David Hunt
2021-09-16 12:34 ` David Marchand
2021-09-20 9:30 ` David Hunt
2021-09-21 11:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] eal: add additional info if core list too long David Hunt
2021-09-21 11:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] eal: add additional info if core mask " David Hunt
2021-09-21 12:00 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-09-21 11:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] eal: add additional info if core list " Bruce Richardson
2021-09-21 12:04 ` David Hunt
2021-09-21 13:16 ` David Hunt
2021-09-21 13:20 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-09-21 13:51 ` David Marchand
2021-09-21 15:10 ` David Hunt
2021-09-22 12:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " David Hunt
2021-09-22 12:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] eal: add additional info if core mask " David Hunt
2021-09-23 8:12 ` David Marchand
2021-09-23 10:21 ` David Hunt
2021-09-23 8:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] eal: add additional info if core list " David Marchand
2021-09-23 9:47 ` David Hunt
2021-09-23 11:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 " David Hunt
2021-09-23 11:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] eal: add additional info if core mask " David Hunt
2021-11-02 17:45 ` David Marchand
2021-11-03 10:27 ` David Hunt
2021-11-03 10:29 ` David Marchand
2021-11-03 13:30 ` David Hunt
2021-11-03 14:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] eal: add additional info if core list " David Hunt
2021-11-03 14:32 ` David Hunt [this message]
2021-11-05 10:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] eal: add additional info if core mask " David Marchand
2021-09-09 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/6] lib/power: reduce memory footprint of acpi lib David Hunt
2021-09-09 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/6] lib/power: reduce memory footprint of pstate lib David Hunt
2021-09-09 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 4/6] lib/power: reduce memory footprint of cppc lib David Hunt
2021-09-09 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 5/6] lib/power: reduce memory footprint of channels David Hunt
2021-09-09 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 6/6] lib/power: switch empty poll to max cores config David Hunt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211103143229.34503-2-david.hunt@intel.com \
--to=david.hunt@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).