From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD14AA0C43; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:43:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A5241181; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:43:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DF241157 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:43:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550881FB; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 01:43:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from net-arm-n1amp-02.shanghai.arm.com (net-arm-n1amp-02.shanghai.arm.com [10.169.210.110]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 40B503F5A1; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 01:43:00 -0800 (PST) From: Joyce Kong To: Konstantin Ananyev Cc: dev@dpdk.org, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, nd@arm.com, Joyce Kong , Ruifeng Wang Subject: [PATCH v2 05/12] test/bpf: use compiler atomics for calculation Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 09:41:58 +0000 Message-Id: <20211116094205.750359-6-joyce.kong@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20211116094205.750359-1-joyce.kong@arm.com> References: <20211116094205.750359-1-joyce.kong@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Convert rte_atomic usages to compiler atomic built-ins for calculation in bpf test cases. Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang --- app/test/test_bpf.c | 28 ++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/app/test/test_bpf.c b/app/test/test_bpf.c index e3e9a1b0b5..b8be1e3d30 100644 --- a/app/test/test_bpf.c +++ b/app/test/test_bpf.c @@ -1569,32 +1569,32 @@ test_xadd1_check(uint64_t rc, const void *arg) memset(&dfe, 0, sizeof(dfe)); rv = 1; - rte_atomic32_add((rte_atomic32_t *)&dfe.u32, rv); - rte_atomic64_add((rte_atomic64_t *)&dfe.u64, rv); + __atomic_fetch_add(&dfe.u32, rv, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); + __atomic_fetch_add(&dfe.u64, rv, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); rv = -1; - rte_atomic32_add((rte_atomic32_t *)&dfe.u32, rv); - rte_atomic64_add((rte_atomic64_t *)&dfe.u64, rv); + __atomic_fetch_add(&dfe.u32, rv, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); + __atomic_fetch_add(&dfe.u64, rv, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); rv = (int32_t)TEST_FILL_1; - rte_atomic32_add((rte_atomic32_t *)&dfe.u32, rv); - rte_atomic64_add((rte_atomic64_t *)&dfe.u64, rv); + __atomic_fetch_add(&dfe.u32, rv, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); + __atomic_fetch_add(&dfe.u64, rv, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); rv = TEST_MUL_1; - rte_atomic32_add((rte_atomic32_t *)&dfe.u32, rv); - rte_atomic64_add((rte_atomic64_t *)&dfe.u64, rv); + __atomic_fetch_add(&dfe.u32, rv, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); + __atomic_fetch_add(&dfe.u64, rv, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); rv = TEST_MUL_2; - rte_atomic32_add((rte_atomic32_t *)&dfe.u32, rv); - rte_atomic64_add((rte_atomic64_t *)&dfe.u64, rv); + __atomic_fetch_add(&dfe.u32, rv, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); + __atomic_fetch_add(&dfe.u64, rv, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); rv = TEST_JCC_2; - rte_atomic32_add((rte_atomic32_t *)&dfe.u32, rv); - rte_atomic64_add((rte_atomic64_t *)&dfe.u64, rv); + __atomic_fetch_add(&dfe.u32, rv, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); + __atomic_fetch_add(&dfe.u64, rv, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); rv = TEST_JCC_3; - rte_atomic32_add((rte_atomic32_t *)&dfe.u32, rv); - rte_atomic64_add((rte_atomic64_t *)&dfe.u64, rv); + __atomic_fetch_add(&dfe.u32, rv, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); + __atomic_fetch_add(&dfe.u64, rv, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); return cmp_res(__func__, 1, rc, &dfe, dft, sizeof(dfe)); } -- 2.25.1