DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com, xuemingl@nvidia.com
Cc: bluca@debian.org, Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] doc: update LTS release cadence
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:48:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211213164858.74244-2-ktraynor@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211213164858.74244-1-ktraynor@redhat.com>

Regular LTS releases have previously aligned to DPDK main branch
releases so that fixes being backported have already gone through
DPDK main branch release validation.

Now that DPDK main branch has moved to 3 releases per year, the LTS
releases should continue to align with it and follow a similar release
cadence.

Update stable docs to reflect this.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
---
 doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
index 69d8312b47..9ee7b4b7cc 100644
--- a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
@@ -39,5 +39,5 @@ A Stable Release is used to backport fixes from an ``N`` release back to an
 ``N-1`` release, for example, from 16.11 to 16.07.
 
-The duration of a stable is one complete release cycle (3 months). It can be
+The duration of a stable is one complete release cycle (4 months). It can be
 longer, up to 1 year, if a maintainer continues to support the stable branch,
 or if users supply backported fixes, however the explicit commitment should be
@@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ A LTS release may align with the declaration of a new major ABI version,
 please read the :doc:`abi_policy` for more information.
 
-It is anticipated that there will be at least 4 releases per year of the LTS
-or approximately 1 every 3 months. However, the cadence can be shorter or
+It is anticipated that there will be at least 3 releases per year of the LTS
+or approximately 1 every 4 months. This is done to align with the DPDK main
+branch releases so that fixes have already gone through validation as part of
+the DPDK main branch release validation. However, the cadence can be shorter or
 longer depending on the number and criticality of the backported
 fixes. Releases should be coordinated with the validation engineers to ensure
-- 
2.31.1


  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-13 16:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-13 16:48 [PATCH 1/2] maintainers: fix stable maintainers list Kevin Traynor
2021-12-13 16:48 ` Kevin Traynor [this message]
2022-01-11 16:53   ` [PATCH 2/2] doc: update LTS release cadence Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211213164858.74244-2-ktraynor@redhat.com \
    --to=ktraynor@redhat.com \
    --cc=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=xuemingl@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).