DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Tudor Cornea <tudor.cornea@gmail.com>
Cc: ferruh.yigit@intel.com, thomas@monjalon.net, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/kni: retry the xmit in case ring is full
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 08:24:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211217082439.13d36631@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1639753232-115930-1-git-send-email-tudor.cornea@gmail.com>

On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 17:00:32 +0200
Tudor Cornea <tudor.cornea@gmail.com> wrote:

> This patch attempts to avoid dropping packets that are to be
> transmitted, in case there is no space in the KNI ring.
> 
> We have a use case in which we leverage the Linux TCP / IP stack for
> control plane, and some protocols might be sensitive to packet drops.
> 
> This might mean that the sender (Kernel) might be moving at a faster pace
> than the receiver end (DPDK application), or it might have some brief
> moments of bursty traffic patterns.
> 
> Requeuing the packets could add a kind of backpressure until a transmit
> window is available to us.
> 
> The burden of retransmitting is shifted to the caller of ndo_start_xmit,
> which in our case is the configured queuing discipline. This way, the
> user should be able to influence the behavior w.r.t dropping packets,
> by picking the desired queuing discipline.
> 
> Although it should technically be a good approach, from what
> I have tested, stopping the queue prior to returning NETDEV_TX_BUSY seems
> to add some extra overhead, and degrade the control-plane performance
> a bit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tudor Cornea <tudor.cornea@gmail.com>

NAK
Doing this risks having a CPU lockup if userspace does not keep up
or the DPDK application gets stuck.

There are better ways to solve the TCP stack queue overrun issue:
1. Use a better queueing discipline on the kni device. The Linux default
   of pfifo_fast has bufferbloat issues. Use fq_codel, fq, codel or pie?
2. KNI should implement BQL so that TCP stack can see lock backpressure
   about possible queue depth.

As a simple workaround increase the KNI ring size. It won't solve the whole
problem but i tcan help

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-17 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-17 15:00 Tudor Cornea
2021-12-17 16:24 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2022-01-17 15:29   ` Tudor Cornea

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211217082439.13d36631@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=tudor.cornea@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).