* [PATCH] net/netvsc: fix the calculation of checksums based on mbuf flag
@ 2022-03-23 4:28 longli
2022-03-23 8:39 ` David Marchand
2022-03-23 14:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: longli @ 2022-03-23 4:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev, Stephen Hemminger; +Cc: Long Li
From: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>
The netvsc should use RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK and check the value to decide
the correct way to calculate checksums.
Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>
---
drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c
index 028f176c7e..34f40be5b8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c
@@ -1348,8 +1348,11 @@ static void hn_encap(struct rndis_packet_msg *pkt,
*pi_data = NDIS_LSO2_INFO_MAKEIPV4(hlen,
m->tso_segsz);
}
- } else if (m->ol_flags &
- (RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TCP_CKSUM | RTE_MBUF_F_TX_UDP_CKSUM | RTE_MBUF_F_TX_IP_CKSUM)) {
+ } else if ((m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK) ==
+ RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TCP_CKSUM ||
+ (m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK) ==
+ RTE_MBUF_F_TX_UDP_CKSUM ||
+ (m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_IP_CKSUM)) {
pi_data = hn_rndis_pktinfo_append(pkt, NDIS_TXCSUM_INFO_SIZE,
NDIS_PKTINFO_TYPE_CSUM);
*pi_data = 0;
@@ -1363,9 +1366,11 @@ static void hn_encap(struct rndis_packet_msg *pkt,
*pi_data |= NDIS_TXCSUM_INFO_IPCS;
}
- if (m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TCP_CKSUM)
+ if ((m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK) ==
+ RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TCP_CKSUM)
*pi_data |= NDIS_TXCSUM_INFO_MKTCPCS(hlen);
- else if (m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_UDP_CKSUM)
+ else if ((m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK) ==
+ RTE_MBUF_F_TX_UDP_CKSUM)
*pi_data |= NDIS_TXCSUM_INFO_MKUDPCS(hlen);
}
--
2.32.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net/netvsc: fix the calculation of checksums based on mbuf flag
2022-03-23 4:28 [PATCH] net/netvsc: fix the calculation of checksums based on mbuf flag longli
@ 2022-03-23 8:39 ` David Marchand
2022-03-23 21:31 ` Long Li
2022-03-23 14:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2022-03-23 8:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: longli; +Cc: dev, Stephen Hemminger, Long Li
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 5:28 AM <longli@linuxonhyperv.com> wrote:
>
> From: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>
>
> The netvsc should use RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK and check the value to decide
> the correct way to calculate checksums.
It's better to describe what the impact for an application is.
Do I understand correctly that UDP checksum offloading was broken?
I guess you want this backported.
Fixes: 4e9c73e96e83 ("net/netvsc: add Hyper-V network device")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c
> index 028f176c7e..34f40be5b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c
> @@ -1348,8 +1348,11 @@ static void hn_encap(struct rndis_packet_msg *pkt,
> *pi_data = NDIS_LSO2_INFO_MAKEIPV4(hlen,
> m->tso_segsz);
> }
> - } else if (m->ol_flags &
> - (RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TCP_CKSUM | RTE_MBUF_F_TX_UDP_CKSUM | RTE_MBUF_F_TX_IP_CKSUM)) {
> + } else if ((m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK) ==
> + RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TCP_CKSUM ||
> + (m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK) ==
> + RTE_MBUF_F_TX_UDP_CKSUM ||
> + (m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_IP_CKSUM)) {
> pi_data = hn_rndis_pktinfo_append(pkt, NDIS_TXCSUM_INFO_SIZE,
> NDIS_PKTINFO_TYPE_CSUM);
> *pi_data = 0;
> @@ -1363,9 +1366,11 @@ static void hn_encap(struct rndis_packet_msg *pkt,
> *pi_data |= NDIS_TXCSUM_INFO_IPCS;
> }
>
> - if (m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TCP_CKSUM)
> + if ((m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK) ==
> + RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TCP_CKSUM)
> *pi_data |= NDIS_TXCSUM_INFO_MKTCPCS(hlen);
> - else if (m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_UDP_CKSUM)
> + else if ((m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK) ==
> + RTE_MBUF_F_TX_UDP_CKSUM)
> *pi_data |= NDIS_TXCSUM_INFO_MKUDPCS(hlen);
> }
>
> --
> 2.32.0
>
--
David Marchand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net/netvsc: fix the calculation of checksums based on mbuf flag
2022-03-23 4:28 [PATCH] net/netvsc: fix the calculation of checksums based on mbuf flag longli
2022-03-23 8:39 ` David Marchand
@ 2022-03-23 14:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2022-03-23 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: longli; +Cc: dev, Stephen Hemminger, Long Li
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 21:28:07 -0700
longli@linuxonhyperv.com wrote:
> From: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>
>
> The netvsc should use RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK and check the value to decide
> the correct way to calculate checksums.
>
> Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] net/netvsc: fix the calculation of checksums based on mbuf flag
2022-03-23 8:39 ` David Marchand
@ 2022-03-23 21:31 ` Long Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Long Li @ 2022-03-23 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Marchand, longli; +Cc: dev, Stephen Hemminger
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/netvsc: fix the calculation of checksums based on
> mbuf flag
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 5:28 AM <longli@linuxonhyperv.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>
> >
> > The netvsc should use RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK and check the value to
> > decide the correct way to calculate checksums.
>
> It's better to describe what the impact for an application is.
> Do I understand correctly that UDP checksum offloading was broken?
>
>
> I guess you want this backported.
> Fixes: 4e9c73e96e83 ("net/netvsc: add Hyper-V network device")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
I'm sending V2 with the Fixes tag.
Thanks,
Long
>
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c | 13 +++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c
> > b/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c index 028f176c7e..34f40be5b8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c
> > @@ -1348,8 +1348,11 @@ static void hn_encap(struct rndis_packet_msg
> *pkt,
> > *pi_data = NDIS_LSO2_INFO_MAKEIPV4(hlen,
> > m->tso_segsz);
> > }
> > - } else if (m->ol_flags &
> > - (RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TCP_CKSUM |
> RTE_MBUF_F_TX_UDP_CKSUM | RTE_MBUF_F_TX_IP_CKSUM)) {
> > + } else if ((m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK) ==
> > + RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TCP_CKSUM ||
> > + (m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK) ==
> > + RTE_MBUF_F_TX_UDP_CKSUM ||
> > + (m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_IP_CKSUM)) {
> > pi_data = hn_rndis_pktinfo_append(pkt,
> NDIS_TXCSUM_INFO_SIZE,
> > NDIS_PKTINFO_TYPE_CSUM);
> > *pi_data = 0;
> > @@ -1363,9 +1366,11 @@ static void hn_encap(struct rndis_packet_msg
> *pkt,
> > *pi_data |= NDIS_TXCSUM_INFO_IPCS;
> > }
> >
> > - if (m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TCP_CKSUM)
> > + if ((m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK) ==
> > + RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TCP_CKSUM)
> > *pi_data |= NDIS_TXCSUM_INFO_MKTCPCS(hlen);
> > - else if (m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_UDP_CKSUM)
> > + else if ((m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK) ==
> > + RTE_MBUF_F_TX_UDP_CKSUM)
> > *pi_data |= NDIS_TXCSUM_INFO_MKUDPCS(hlen);
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.32.0
> >
>
>
> --
> David Marchand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-03-23 21:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-03-23 4:28 [PATCH] net/netvsc: fix the calculation of checksums based on mbuf flag longli
2022-03-23 8:39 ` David Marchand
2022-03-23 21:31 ` Long Li
2022-03-23 14:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).