From: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, techboard@dpdk.org,
David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal/ppc: undefine AltiVec keyword vector
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 11:34:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220525183459.GA24690@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878rqpze0j.fsf@mdr78.vserver.site>
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 07:02:52PM +0100, Ray Kinsella wrote:
>
> Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> writes:
>
> > 25/05/2022 13:48, Ray Kinsella:
> >>
> >> Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> writes:
> >>
> >> > The AltiVec header file is defining "vector", except in C++ build.
> >> > The keyword "vector" may conflict easily.
> >> > As a rule, it is better to use the alternative keyword "__vector".
> >> >
> >> > The DPDK header file rte_altivec.h takes care of undefining "vector",
> >> > so the applications and dependencies are free to define the name "vector".
> >> >
> >> > This is a compatibility breakage for applications which were using
> >> > the keyword "vector" for its AltiVec meaning.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> >> > ---
> >> > doc/guides/rel_notes/release_22_07.rst | 5 +++++
> >> > lib/eal/ppc/include/rte_altivec.h | 7 +++++++
> >> > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >> >
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>
> >
> > Just to make sure, we are all OK to break compatibility of rte_altivec.h?
> > It means the keyword vector is not available anymore with this #include.
> > Please confirm it is OK to merge in DPDK 22.07.
>
> I did think about it yes ;-).
> I can't see how it would break the ABI in the short term.
> And it makes sense to preclude this keyword in the long term.
>
> So I ack'ed - did I miss something?
Acked-by: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
double ack, impact of break is understood as follows.
* this is not an issue with abi it is an issue with api.
* the break will cause a compile failure, the action to resolve is to
replace vector with __vector.
>
>
> --
> Regards, Ray K
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-25 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-25 9:53 Thomas Monjalon
2022-05-25 10:01 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-05-25 11:08 ` Ali Alnubani
2022-05-25 11:10 ` Ali Alnubani
2022-05-25 11:48 ` Ray Kinsella
2022-05-25 15:40 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-05-25 18:02 ` Ray Kinsella
2022-05-25 18:34 ` Tyler Retzlaff [this message]
2022-05-26 10:18 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-05-26 11:02 ` Ray Kinsella
2022-06-01 15:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220525183459.GA24690@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net \
--to=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).