From: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, gakhil@marvell.com, trix@redhat.com,
maxime.coquelin@redhat.com
Cc: nicolas.chautru@intel.com, qi.z.zhang@intel.com,
Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>,
stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 07/29] baseband/acc100: enforce additional check on FCW
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 22:20:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221021052102.107141-8-hernan.vargas@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221021052102.107141-1-hernan.vargas@intel.com>
Enforce additional check on Frame Control Word validity and add stronger
alignment for decompression mode.
Fixes: 5ad5060f8f7 ("baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
---
drivers/baseband/acc/acc100_pmd.h | 1 +
drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h | 1 +
drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/acc100_pmd.h b/drivers/baseband/acc/acc100_pmd.h
index 9486e98521..eb6349c85a 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/acc/acc100_pmd.h
+++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/acc100_pmd.h
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@
#define ACC100_HARQ_DDR (512 * 1)
#define ACC100_PRQ_DDR_VER 0x10092020
#define ACC100_DDR_TRAINING_MAX (5000)
+#define ACC100_HARQ_ALIGN_COMP 256
struct acc100_registry_addr {
unsigned int dma_ring_dl5g_hi;
diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h b/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h
index 6f141c95ce..97d10b8b40 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h
+++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h
@@ -120,6 +120,7 @@
#define ACC_ALGO_SPA 0
#define ACC_ALGO_MSA 1
+#define ACC_HARQ_ALIGN_64B 64
/* Helper macro for logging */
#define rte_acc_log(level, fmt, ...) \
diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
index e8ec70d954..13a762cb80 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
+++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
@@ -1040,6 +1040,7 @@ acc100_fcw_ld_fill(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc_fcw_ld *fcw,
uint16_t harq_index;
uint32_t l;
bool harq_prun = false;
+ uint32_t max_hc_in;
fcw->qm = op->ldpc_dec.q_m;
fcw->nfiller = op->ldpc_dec.n_filler;
@@ -1089,13 +1090,22 @@ acc100_fcw_ld_fill(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc_fcw_ld *fcw,
harq_in_length = op->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_input.length;
if (fcw->hcin_decomp_mode > 0)
harq_in_length = harq_in_length * 8 / 6;
- harq_in_length = RTE_ALIGN(harq_in_length, 64);
- if ((harq_layout[harq_index].offset > 0) & harq_prun) {
+
+ harq_in_length = RTE_MIN(harq_in_length, op->ldpc_dec.n_cb
+ - op->ldpc_dec.n_filler);
+
+ /* Alignment on next 64B - Already enforced from HC output */
+ harq_in_length = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(harq_in_length, ACC_HARQ_ALIGN_64B);
+
+ /* Stronger alignment requirement when in decompression mode */
+ if (fcw->hcin_decomp_mode > 0)
+ harq_in_length = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(harq_in_length, ACC100_HARQ_ALIGN_COMP);
+
+ if ((harq_layout[harq_index].offset > 0) && harq_prun) {
rte_bbdev_log_debug("HARQ IN offset unexpected for now\n");
fcw->hcin_size0 = harq_layout[harq_index].size0;
fcw->hcin_offset = harq_layout[harq_index].offset;
- fcw->hcin_size1 = harq_in_length -
- harq_layout[harq_index].offset;
+ fcw->hcin_size1 = harq_in_length - harq_layout[harq_index].offset;
} else {
fcw->hcin_size0 = harq_in_length;
fcw->hcin_offset = 0;
@@ -1107,6 +1117,21 @@ acc100_fcw_ld_fill(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc_fcw_ld *fcw,
fcw->hcin_size1 = 0;
}
+ /* Enforce additional check on FCW validity */
+ max_hc_in = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(fcw->ncb - fcw->nfiller, ACC_HARQ_ALIGN_64B);
+ if ((fcw->hcin_size0 > max_hc_in) ||
+ (fcw->hcin_size1 + fcw->hcin_offset > max_hc_in) ||
+ ((fcw->hcin_size0 > fcw->hcin_offset) &&
+ (fcw->hcin_size1 != 0))) {
+ rte_bbdev_log(ERR, " Invalid FCW : HCIn %d %d %d, Ncb %d F %d",
+ fcw->hcin_size0, fcw->hcin_size1,
+ fcw->hcin_offset,
+ fcw->ncb, fcw->nfiller);
+ /* Disable HARQ input in that case to carry forward */
+ op->ldpc_dec.op_flags ^= RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_HQ_COMBINE_IN_ENABLE;
+ fcw->hcin_en = 0;
+ }
+
fcw->itmax = op->ldpc_dec.iter_max;
fcw->itstop = check_bit(op->ldpc_dec.op_flags,
RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_ITERATION_STOP_ENABLE);
@@ -1131,15 +1156,27 @@ acc100_fcw_ld_fill(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc_fcw_ld *fcw,
if (fcw->hcout_en > 0) {
parity_offset = (op->ldpc_dec.basegraph == 1 ? 20 : 8)
* op->ldpc_dec.z_c - op->ldpc_dec.n_filler;
- k0_p = (fcw->k0 > parity_offset) ?
- fcw->k0 - op->ldpc_dec.n_filler : fcw->k0;
+ k0_p = (fcw->k0 > parity_offset) ? fcw->k0 - op->ldpc_dec.n_filler : fcw->k0;
ncb_p = fcw->ncb - op->ldpc_dec.n_filler;
- l = k0_p + fcw->rm_e;
+ l = RTE_MIN(k0_p + fcw->rm_e, INT16_MAX);
harq_out_length = (uint16_t) fcw->hcin_size0;
- harq_out_length = RTE_MIN(RTE_MAX(harq_out_length, l), ncb_p);
- harq_out_length = (harq_out_length + 0x3F) & 0xFFC0;
- if ((k0_p > fcw->hcin_size0 + ACC_HARQ_OFFSET_THRESHOLD) &&
- harq_prun) {
+ harq_out_length = RTE_MAX(harq_out_length, l);
+
+ /* Stronger alignment when in compression mode */
+ if (fcw->hcout_comp_mode > 0)
+ harq_out_length = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(harq_out_length, ACC100_HARQ_ALIGN_COMP);
+
+ /* Cannot exceed the pruned Ncb circular buffer */
+ harq_out_length = RTE_MIN(harq_out_length, ncb_p);
+
+ /* Alignment on next 64B */
+ harq_out_length = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(harq_out_length, ACC_HARQ_ALIGN_64B);
+
+ /* Stronger alignment when in compression mode enforced again */
+ if (fcw->hcout_comp_mode > 0)
+ harq_out_length = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(harq_out_length, ACC100_HARQ_ALIGN_COMP);
+
+ if ((k0_p > fcw->hcin_size0 + ACC_HARQ_OFFSET_THRESHOLD) && harq_prun) {
fcw->hcout_size0 = (uint16_t) fcw->hcin_size0;
fcw->hcout_offset = k0_p & 0xFFC0;
fcw->hcout_size1 = harq_out_length - fcw->hcout_offset;
@@ -1148,6 +1185,14 @@ acc100_fcw_ld_fill(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc_fcw_ld *fcw,
fcw->hcout_size1 = 0;
fcw->hcout_offset = 0;
}
+
+ if (fcw->hcout_size0 == 0) {
+ rte_bbdev_log(ERR, " Invalid FCW : HCout %d",
+ fcw->hcout_size0);
+ op->ldpc_dec.op_flags ^= RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_HQ_COMBINE_OUT_ENABLE;
+ fcw->hcout_en = 0;
+ }
+
harq_layout[harq_index].offset = fcw->hcout_offset;
harq_layout[harq_index].size0 = fcw->hcout_size0;
} else {
@@ -1188,6 +1233,10 @@ acc101_fcw_ld_fill(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc_fcw_ld *fcw,
/* Disable HARQ input in that case to carry forward */
op->ldpc_dec.op_flags ^= RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_HQ_COMBINE_IN_ENABLE;
}
+ if (unlikely(fcw->rm_e == 0)) {
+ rte_bbdev_log(WARNING, "Null E input provided");
+ fcw->rm_e = 2;
+ }
fcw->hcin_en = check_bit(op->ldpc_dec.op_flags,
RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_HQ_COMBINE_IN_ENABLE);
--
2.37.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-20 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-21 5:20 [PATCH v5 00/29] baseband/acc100: changes for 22.11 Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v5 01/29] baseband/acc100: fix ring availability calculation Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 9:04 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-10-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v5 02/29] baseband/acc100: add function to check AQ availability Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 9:07 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-10-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v5 03/29] baseband/acc100: memory leak fix Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v5 04/29] baseband/acc100: add LDPC encoder padding function Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v5 05/29] baseband/acc100: check turbo dec/enc input Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v5 06/29] baseband/acc100: check for unlikely operation vals Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 5:20 ` Hernan Vargas [this message]
2022-10-21 9:08 ` [PATCH v5 07/29] baseband/acc100: enforce additional check on FCW Maxime Coquelin
2022-10-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v5 08/29] baseband/acc100: allocate ring/queue mem when NULL Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 9:16 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-10-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v5 09/29] baseband/acc100: reduce input length for CRC24B Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v5 10/29] baseband/acc100: fix clearing PF IR outside handler Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v5 11/29] baseband/acc100: set device min alignment to 1 Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v5 12/29] baseband/acc100: add protection for NULL HARQ input Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v5 13/29] baseband/acc100: reset pointer after rte_free Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v5 14/29] baseband/acc100: fix debug print for LDPC FCW Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v5 15/29] baseband/acc100: add enqueue status Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v5 16/29] baseband/acc100: add scatter-gather support Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v5 17/29] baseband/acc100: add HARQ index helper function Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v5 18/29] baseband/acc100: enable input validation by default Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v5 19/29] baseband/acc100: added LDPC transport block support Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v5 20/29] baseband/acc100: update validate LDPC enc/dec Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 9:21 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-10-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v5 21/29] baseband/acc100: implement configurable queue depth Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v5 22/29] baseband/acc100: add queue stop operation Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v5 23/29] baseband/acc100: update uplink CB input length Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v5 24/29] baseband/acc100: update log messages Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v5 25/29] baseband/acc100: store FCW from first CB descriptor Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v5 26/29] baseband/acc100: update device info Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 5:21 ` [PATCH v5 27/29] baseband/acc100: add ring companion address Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 9:29 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-10-21 5:21 ` [PATCH v5 28/29] baseband/acc100: add workaround for deRM corner cases Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 9:32 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-10-21 15:40 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-10-21 5:21 ` [PATCH v5 29/29] baseband/acc100: configure PMON control registers Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 13:06 ` [EXT] [PATCH v5 00/29] baseband/acc100: changes for 22.11 Akhil Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221021052102.107141-8-hernan.vargas@intel.com \
--to=hernan.vargas@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).