[PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq

[PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq

[Mingjin Ye]

After setting vlan offload in testpmd, the result is not updated
to rxq. Therefore, the queue needs to be reconfigured after
executing the "vlan offload" related commands.

Fixes: a47aa8b97afe ("app/testpmd: add vlan offload support")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
---
 app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
index 17be2de402..ce125f549f 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
@@ -4133,6 +4133,7 @@ cmd_vlan_offload_parsed(void *parsed_result,
 	else
 		vlan_extend_set(port_id, on);
 
+	cmd_reconfig_device_queue(port_id, 1, 1);
 	return;
 }
 
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH v4 2/2] net/ice: fix vlan offload

[Mingjin Ye]

The vlan tag and flag in Rx descriptor are not processed on vector path,
then the upper application cann't fetch the tci from mbuf.

This commit add handling of vlan RX offloading.

Fixes: c68a52b8b38c ("net/ice: support vector SSE in Rx")
Fixes: ece1f8a8f1c8 ("net/ice: switch to flexible descriptor in SSE path")
Fixes: 12443386a0b0 ("net/ice: support flex Rx descriptor RxDID22")
Fixes: 214f452f7d5f ("net/ice: add AVX2 offload Rx")
Fixes: 7f85d5ebcfe1 ("net/ice: add AVX512 vector path")
Fixes: 295968d17407 ("ethdev: add namespace")
Fixes: 808a17b3c1e6 ("net/ice: add Rx AVX512 offload path")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>

v3:
	* Fix macros in ice_rxtx_vec_sse.c source file.
v4:
	* Fix ice_rx_desc_to_olflags_v define in ice_rxtx_vec_sse.c source file.
---
 drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_avx2.c   | 136 +++++++++++++++++-----
 drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_avx512.c | 156 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
 drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_sse.c    | 132 ++++++++++++++++------
 3 files changed, 335 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_avx2.c b/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_avx2.c
index 31d6af42fd..888666f206 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_avx2.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_avx2.c
@@ -238,6 +238,7 @@ _ice_recv_raw_pkts_vec_avx2(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
 			RTE_MBUF_F_RX_VLAN | RTE_MBUF_F_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED,
 			RTE_MBUF_F_RX_RSS_HASH, 0);
 
+
 	RTE_SET_USED(avx_aligned); /* for 32B descriptors we don't use this */
 
 	uint16_t i, received;
@@ -474,7 +475,7 @@ _ice_recv_raw_pkts_vec_avx2(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
 			 * will cause performance drop to get into this context.
 			 */
 			if (rxq->vsi->adapter->pf.dev_data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads &
-					RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH) {
+					(RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH | RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN)) {
 				/* load bottom half of every 32B desc */
 				const __m128i raw_desc_bh7 =
 					_mm_load_si128
@@ -529,33 +530,112 @@ _ice_recv_raw_pkts_vec_avx2(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
 				 * to shift the 32b RSS hash value to the
 				 * highest 32b of each 128b before mask
 				 */
-				__m256i rss_hash6_7 =
-					_mm256_slli_epi64(raw_desc_bh6_7, 32);
-				__m256i rss_hash4_5 =
-					_mm256_slli_epi64(raw_desc_bh4_5, 32);
-				__m256i rss_hash2_3 =
-					_mm256_slli_epi64(raw_desc_bh2_3, 32);
-				__m256i rss_hash0_1 =
-					_mm256_slli_epi64(raw_desc_bh0_1, 32);
-
-				__m256i rss_hash_msk =
-					_mm256_set_epi32(0xFFFFFFFF, 0, 0, 0,
-							 0xFFFFFFFF, 0, 0, 0);
-
-				rss_hash6_7 = _mm256_and_si256
-						(rss_hash6_7, rss_hash_msk);
-				rss_hash4_5 = _mm256_and_si256
-						(rss_hash4_5, rss_hash_msk);
-				rss_hash2_3 = _mm256_and_si256
-						(rss_hash2_3, rss_hash_msk);
-				rss_hash0_1 = _mm256_and_si256
-						(rss_hash0_1, rss_hash_msk);
-
-				mb6_7 = _mm256_or_si256(mb6_7, rss_hash6_7);
-				mb4_5 = _mm256_or_si256(mb4_5, rss_hash4_5);
-				mb2_3 = _mm256_or_si256(mb2_3, rss_hash2_3);
-				mb0_1 = _mm256_or_si256(mb0_1, rss_hash0_1);
-			} /* if() on RSS hash parsing */
+				if (rxq->vsi->adapter->pf.dev_data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads &
+						RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH) {
+					__m256i rss_hash6_7 =
+						_mm256_slli_epi64(raw_desc_bh6_7, 32);
+					__m256i rss_hash4_5 =
+						_mm256_slli_epi64(raw_desc_bh4_5, 32);
+					__m256i rss_hash2_3 =
+						_mm256_slli_epi64(raw_desc_bh2_3, 32);
+					__m256i rss_hash0_1 =
+						_mm256_slli_epi64(raw_desc_bh0_1, 32);
+
+					__m256i rss_hash_msk =
+						_mm256_set_epi32(0xFFFFFFFF, 0, 0, 0,
+								0xFFFFFFFF, 0, 0, 0);
+
+					rss_hash6_7 = _mm256_and_si256
+							(rss_hash6_7, rss_hash_msk);
+					rss_hash4_5 = _mm256_and_si256
+							(rss_hash4_5, rss_hash_msk);
+					rss_hash2_3 = _mm256_and_si256
+							(rss_hash2_3, rss_hash_msk);
+					rss_hash0_1 = _mm256_and_si256
+							(rss_hash0_1, rss_hash_msk);
+
+					mb6_7 = _mm256_or_si256(mb6_7, rss_hash6_7);
+					mb4_5 = _mm256_or_si256(mb4_5, rss_hash4_5);
+					mb2_3 = _mm256_or_si256(mb2_3, rss_hash2_3);
+					mb0_1 = _mm256_or_si256(mb0_1, rss_hash0_1);
+				} /* if() on RSS hash parsing */
+
+				if (rxq->vsi->adapter->pf.dev_data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads &
+						RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN) {
+					/* merge the status/error-1 bits into one register */
+					const __m256i status1_4_7 =
+							_mm256_unpacklo_epi32(raw_desc_bh6_7,
+							raw_desc_bh4_5);
+					const __m256i status1_0_3 =
+							_mm256_unpacklo_epi32(raw_desc_bh2_3,
+							raw_desc_bh0_1);
+
+					const __m256i status1_0_7 =
+							_mm256_unpacklo_epi64(status1_4_7,
+							status1_0_3);
+
+					const __m256i l2tag2p_flag_mask =
+							_mm256_set1_epi32(1 << 11);
+
+					__m256i l2tag2p_flag_bits =
+							_mm256_and_si256
+							(status1_0_7, l2tag2p_flag_mask);
+
+					l2tag2p_flag_bits =
+							_mm256_srli_epi32(l2tag2p_flag_bits,
+									11);
+
+					__m256i vlan_flags = _mm256_setzero_si256();
+					const __m256i l2tag2_flags_shuf =
+							_mm256_set_epi8(0, 0, 0, 0,
+									0, 0, 0, 0,
+									0, 0, 0, 0,
+									0, 0, 0, 0,
+									/* end up 128-bits */
+									0, 0, 0, 0,
+									0, 0, 0, 0,
+									0, 0, 0, 0,
+									0, 0,
+									RTE_MBUF_F_RX_VLAN |
+									RTE_MBUF_F_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED,
+									0);
+					vlan_flags =
+							_mm256_shuffle_epi8(l2tag2_flags_shuf,
+							l2tag2p_flag_bits);
+
+					/* merge with vlan_flags */
+					mbuf_flags = _mm256_or_si256
+							(mbuf_flags, vlan_flags);
+
+					/* L2TAG2_2 */
+					__m256i vlan_tci6_7 =
+							_mm256_slli_si256(raw_desc_bh6_7, 4);
+					__m256i vlan_tci4_5 =
+							_mm256_slli_si256(raw_desc_bh4_5, 4);
+					__m256i vlan_tci2_3 =
+							_mm256_slli_si256(raw_desc_bh2_3, 4);
+					__m256i vlan_tci0_1 =
+							_mm256_slli_si256(raw_desc_bh0_1, 4);
+
+					const __m256i vlan_tci_msk =
+							_mm256_set_epi32(0, 0xFFFF0000, 0, 0,
+							0, 0xFFFF0000, 0, 0);
+
+					vlan_tci6_7 = _mm256_and_si256
+									(vlan_tci6_7, vlan_tci_msk);
+					vlan_tci4_5 = _mm256_and_si256
+									(vlan_tci4_5, vlan_tci_msk);
+					vlan_tci2_3 = _mm256_and_si256
+									(vlan_tci2_3, vlan_tci_msk);
+					vlan_tci0_1 = _mm256_and_si256
+									(vlan_tci0_1, vlan_tci_msk);
+
+					mb6_7 = _mm256_or_si256(mb6_7, vlan_tci6_7);
+					mb4_5 = _mm256_or_si256(mb4_5, vlan_tci4_5);
+					mb2_3 = _mm256_or_si256(mb2_3, vlan_tci2_3);
+					mb0_1 = _mm256_or_si256(mb0_1, vlan_tci0_1);
+				}
+			}
 #endif
 		}
 
diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_avx512.c b/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_avx512.c
index 5bfd5152df..e5cf777cf5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_avx512.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_avx512.c
@@ -338,6 +338,8 @@ _ice_recv_raw_pkts_vec_avx512(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq,
 			RTE_MBUF_F_RX_VLAN | RTE_MBUF_F_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED,
 			RTE_MBUF_F_RX_RSS_HASH, 0);
 
+
+
 	uint16_t i, received;
 
 	for (i = 0, received = 0; i < nb_pkts;
@@ -585,7 +587,7 @@ _ice_recv_raw_pkts_vec_avx512(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq,
 			 * will cause performance drop to get into this context.
 			 */
 			if (rxq->vsi->adapter->pf.dev_data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads &
-					RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH) {
+					(RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH | RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN)) {
 				/* load bottom half of every 32B desc */
 				const __m128i raw_desc_bh7 =
 					_mm_load_si128
@@ -640,33 +642,131 @@ _ice_recv_raw_pkts_vec_avx512(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq,
 				 * to shift the 32b RSS hash value to the
 				 * highest 32b of each 128b before mask
 				 */
-				__m256i rss_hash6_7 =
-					_mm256_slli_epi64(raw_desc_bh6_7, 32);
-				__m256i rss_hash4_5 =
-					_mm256_slli_epi64(raw_desc_bh4_5, 32);
-				__m256i rss_hash2_3 =
-					_mm256_slli_epi64(raw_desc_bh2_3, 32);
-				__m256i rss_hash0_1 =
-					_mm256_slli_epi64(raw_desc_bh0_1, 32);
-
-				__m256i rss_hash_msk =
-					_mm256_set_epi32(0xFFFFFFFF, 0, 0, 0,
-							 0xFFFFFFFF, 0, 0, 0);
-
-				rss_hash6_7 = _mm256_and_si256
-						(rss_hash6_7, rss_hash_msk);
-				rss_hash4_5 = _mm256_and_si256
-						(rss_hash4_5, rss_hash_msk);
-				rss_hash2_3 = _mm256_and_si256
-						(rss_hash2_3, rss_hash_msk);
-				rss_hash0_1 = _mm256_and_si256
-						(rss_hash0_1, rss_hash_msk);
-
-				mb6_7 = _mm256_or_si256(mb6_7, rss_hash6_7);
-				mb4_5 = _mm256_or_si256(mb4_5, rss_hash4_5);
-				mb2_3 = _mm256_or_si256(mb2_3, rss_hash2_3);
-				mb0_1 = _mm256_or_si256(mb0_1, rss_hash0_1);
-			} /* if() on RSS hash parsing */
+				if (rxq->vsi->adapter->pf.dev_data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads &
+						RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH) {
+					__m256i rss_hash6_7 =
+						_mm256_slli_epi64(raw_desc_bh6_7, 32);
+					__m256i rss_hash4_5 =
+						_mm256_slli_epi64(raw_desc_bh4_5, 32);
+					__m256i rss_hash2_3 =
+						_mm256_slli_epi64(raw_desc_bh2_3, 32);
+					__m256i rss_hash0_1 =
+						_mm256_slli_epi64(raw_desc_bh0_1, 32);
+
+					__m256i rss_hash_msk =
+						_mm256_set_epi32(0xFFFFFFFF, 0, 0, 0,
+								0xFFFFFFFF, 0, 0, 0);
+
+					rss_hash6_7 = _mm256_and_si256
+							(rss_hash6_7, rss_hash_msk);
+					rss_hash4_5 = _mm256_and_si256
+							(rss_hash4_5, rss_hash_msk);
+					rss_hash2_3 = _mm256_and_si256
+							(rss_hash2_3, rss_hash_msk);
+					rss_hash0_1 = _mm256_and_si256
+							(rss_hash0_1, rss_hash_msk);
+
+					mb6_7 = _mm256_or_si256(mb6_7, rss_hash6_7);
+					mb4_5 = _mm256_or_si256(mb4_5, rss_hash4_5);
+					mb2_3 = _mm256_or_si256(mb2_3, rss_hash2_3);
+					mb0_1 = _mm256_or_si256(mb0_1, rss_hash0_1);
+				} /* if() on RSS hash parsing */
+
+				if (rxq->vsi->adapter->pf.dev_data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads &
+							RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN) {
+					/* merge the status/error-1 bits into one register */
+					const __m256i status1_4_7 =
+						_mm256_unpacklo_epi32
+						(raw_desc_bh6_7,
+						raw_desc_bh4_5);
+					const __m256i status1_0_3 =
+						_mm256_unpacklo_epi32
+						(raw_desc_bh2_3,
+						raw_desc_bh0_1);
+
+					const __m256i status1_0_7 =
+						_mm256_unpacklo_epi64
+						(status1_4_7, status1_0_3);
+
+					const __m256i l2tag2p_flag_mask =
+						_mm256_set1_epi32
+						(1 << 11);
+
+					__m256i l2tag2p_flag_bits =
+						_mm256_and_si256
+						(status1_0_7,
+						l2tag2p_flag_mask);
+
+					l2tag2p_flag_bits =
+						_mm256_srli_epi32
+						(l2tag2p_flag_bits,
+						11);
+					const __m256i l2tag2_flags_shuf =
+						_mm256_set_epi8
+							(0, 0, 0, 0,
+							0, 0, 0, 0,
+							0, 0, 0, 0,
+							0, 0, 0, 0,
+							/* end up 128-bits */
+							0, 0, 0, 0,
+							0, 0, 0, 0,
+							0, 0, 0, 0,
+							0, 0,
+							RTE_MBUF_F_RX_VLAN |
+							RTE_MBUF_F_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED,
+							0);
+					__m256i vlan_flags =
+						_mm256_shuffle_epi8
+							(l2tag2_flags_shuf,
+							l2tag2p_flag_bits);
+
+					/* merge with vlan_flags */
+					mbuf_flags = _mm256_or_si256
+							(mbuf_flags,
+							vlan_flags);
+
+					/* L2TAG2_2 */
+					__m256i vlan_tci6_7 =
+						_mm256_slli_si256
+							(raw_desc_bh6_7, 4);
+					__m256i vlan_tci4_5 =
+						_mm256_slli_si256
+							(raw_desc_bh4_5, 4);
+					__m256i vlan_tci2_3 =
+						_mm256_slli_si256
+							(raw_desc_bh2_3, 4);
+					__m256i vlan_tci0_1 =
+						_mm256_slli_si256
+							(raw_desc_bh0_1, 4);
+
+					const __m256i vlan_tci_msk =
+						_mm256_set_epi32
+						(0, 0xFFFF0000, 0, 0,
+						0, 0xFFFF0000, 0, 0);
+
+					vlan_tci6_7 = _mm256_and_si256
+							(vlan_tci6_7,
+							vlan_tci_msk);
+					vlan_tci4_5 = _mm256_and_si256
+							(vlan_tci4_5,
+							vlan_tci_msk);
+					vlan_tci2_3 = _mm256_and_si256
+							(vlan_tci2_3,
+							vlan_tci_msk);
+					vlan_tci0_1 = _mm256_and_si256
+							(vlan_tci0_1,
+							vlan_tci_msk);
+
+					mb6_7 = _mm256_or_si256
+							(mb6_7, vlan_tci6_7);
+					mb4_5 = _mm256_or_si256
+							(mb4_5, vlan_tci4_5);
+					mb2_3 = _mm256_or_si256
+							(mb2_3, vlan_tci2_3);
+					mb0_1 = _mm256_or_si256
+							(mb0_1, vlan_tci0_1);
+				}
+			}
 #endif
 		}
 
diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_sse.c b/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_sse.c
index fd94cedde3..0e5fe94530 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_sse.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_sse.c
@@ -100,9 +100,15 @@ ice_rxq_rearm(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq)
 	ICE_PCI_REG_WC_WRITE(rxq->qrx_tail, rx_id);
 }
 
+#ifndef RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_16BYTE_RX_DESC
+static inline void
+ice_rx_desc_to_olflags_v(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq, __m128i descs[4], __m128i descs_bh[4],
+			 struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts)
+#else
 static inline void
 ice_rx_desc_to_olflags_v(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq, __m128i descs[4],
 			 struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts)
+#endif
 {
 	const __m128i mbuf_init = _mm_set_epi64x(0, rxq->mbuf_initializer);
 	__m128i rearm0, rearm1, rearm2, rearm3;
@@ -214,6 +220,38 @@ ice_rx_desc_to_olflags_v(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq, __m128i descs[4],
 	/* merge the flags */
 	flags = _mm_or_si128(flags, rss_vlan);
 
+ #ifndef RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_16BYTE_RX_DESC
+	if (rxq->vsi->adapter->pf.dev_data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads &
+							RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN) {
+		const __m128i l2tag2_mask =
+			_mm_set1_epi32(1 << 11);
+		const __m128i vlan_tci0_1 =
+			_mm_unpacklo_epi32(descs_bh[0], descs_bh[1]);
+		const __m128i vlan_tci2_3 =
+			_mm_unpacklo_epi32(descs_bh[2], descs_bh[3]);
+		const __m128i vlan_tci0_3 =
+			_mm_unpacklo_epi64(vlan_tci0_1, vlan_tci2_3);
+
+		__m128i vlan_bits = _mm_and_si128(vlan_tci0_3, l2tag2_mask);
+
+		vlan_bits = _mm_srli_epi32(vlan_bits, 11);
+
+		const __m128i vlan_flags_shuf =
+			_mm_set_epi8(0, 0, 0, 0,
+					0, 0, 0, 0,
+					0, 0, 0, 0,
+					0, 0,
+					RTE_MBUF_F_RX_VLAN |
+					RTE_MBUF_F_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED,
+					0);
+
+		const __m128i vlan_flags = _mm_shuffle_epi8(vlan_flags_shuf, vlan_bits);
+
+		/* merge with vlan_flags */
+		flags = _mm_or_si128(flags, vlan_flags);
+	}
+#endif
+
 	if (rxq->fdir_enabled) {
 		const __m128i fdir_id0_1 =
 			_mm_unpackhi_epi32(descs[0], descs[1]);
@@ -405,6 +443,9 @@ _ice_recv_raw_pkts_vec(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
 	     pos += ICE_DESCS_PER_LOOP,
 	     rxdp += ICE_DESCS_PER_LOOP) {
 		__m128i descs[ICE_DESCS_PER_LOOP];
+		#ifndef RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_16BYTE_RX_DESC
+		__m128i descs_bh[ICE_DESCS_PER_LOOP];
+		#endif
 		__m128i pkt_mb0, pkt_mb1, pkt_mb2, pkt_mb3;
 		__m128i staterr, sterr_tmp1, sterr_tmp2;
 		/* 2 64 bit or 4 32 bit mbuf pointers in one XMM reg. */
@@ -463,8 +504,6 @@ _ice_recv_raw_pkts_vec(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
 		/* C.1 4=>2 filter staterr info only */
 		sterr_tmp1 = _mm_unpackhi_epi32(descs[1], descs[0]);
 
-		ice_rx_desc_to_olflags_v(rxq, descs, &rx_pkts[pos]);
-
 		/* D.2 pkt 3,4 set in_port/nb_seg and remove crc */
 		pkt_mb3 = _mm_add_epi16(pkt_mb3, crc_adjust);
 		pkt_mb2 = _mm_add_epi16(pkt_mb2, crc_adjust);
@@ -479,21 +518,21 @@ _ice_recv_raw_pkts_vec(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
 		 * will cause performance drop to get into this context.
 		 */
 		if (rxq->vsi->adapter->pf.dev_data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads &
-				RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH) {
+					(RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH | RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN)) {
 			/* load bottom half of every 32B desc */
-			const __m128i raw_desc_bh3 =
+			descs_bh[3] =
 				_mm_load_si128
 					((void *)(&rxdp[3].wb.status_error1));
 			rte_compiler_barrier();
-			const __m128i raw_desc_bh2 =
+			descs_bh[2] =
 				_mm_load_si128
 					((void *)(&rxdp[2].wb.status_error1));
 			rte_compiler_barrier();
-			const __m128i raw_desc_bh1 =
+			descs_bh[1] =
 				_mm_load_si128
 					((void *)(&rxdp[1].wb.status_error1));
 			rte_compiler_barrier();
-			const __m128i raw_desc_bh0 =
+			descs_bh[0] =
 				_mm_load_si128
 					((void *)(&rxdp[0].wb.status_error1));
 
@@ -501,32 +540,59 @@ _ice_recv_raw_pkts_vec(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
 			 * to shift the 32b RSS hash value to the
 			 * highest 32b of each 128b before mask
 			 */
-			__m128i rss_hash3 =
-				_mm_slli_epi64(raw_desc_bh3, 32);
-			__m128i rss_hash2 =
-				_mm_slli_epi64(raw_desc_bh2, 32);
-			__m128i rss_hash1 =
-				_mm_slli_epi64(raw_desc_bh1, 32);
-			__m128i rss_hash0 =
-				_mm_slli_epi64(raw_desc_bh0, 32);
-
-			__m128i rss_hash_msk =
-				_mm_set_epi32(0xFFFFFFFF, 0, 0, 0);
-
-			rss_hash3 = _mm_and_si128
-					(rss_hash3, rss_hash_msk);
-			rss_hash2 = _mm_and_si128
-					(rss_hash2, rss_hash_msk);
-			rss_hash1 = _mm_and_si128
-					(rss_hash1, rss_hash_msk);
-			rss_hash0 = _mm_and_si128
-					(rss_hash0, rss_hash_msk);
-
-			pkt_mb3 = _mm_or_si128(pkt_mb3, rss_hash3);
-			pkt_mb2 = _mm_or_si128(pkt_mb2, rss_hash2);
-			pkt_mb1 = _mm_or_si128(pkt_mb1, rss_hash1);
-			pkt_mb0 = _mm_or_si128(pkt_mb0, rss_hash0);
-		} /* if() on RSS hash parsing */
+			if (rxq->vsi->adapter->pf.dev_data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads &
+							RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH) {
+				__m128i rss_hash3 =
+					_mm_slli_epi64(descs_bh[3], 32);
+				__m128i rss_hash2 =
+					_mm_slli_epi64(descs_bh[2], 32);
+				__m128i rss_hash1 =
+					_mm_slli_epi64(descs_bh[1], 32);
+				__m128i rss_hash0 =
+					_mm_slli_epi64(descs_bh[0], 32);
+
+				__m128i rss_hash_msk =
+					_mm_set_epi32(0xFFFFFFFF, 0, 0, 0);
+
+				rss_hash3 = _mm_and_si128
+						(rss_hash3, rss_hash_msk);
+				rss_hash2 = _mm_and_si128
+						(rss_hash2, rss_hash_msk);
+				rss_hash1 = _mm_and_si128
+						(rss_hash1, rss_hash_msk);
+				rss_hash0 = _mm_and_si128
+						(rss_hash0, rss_hash_msk);
+
+				pkt_mb3 = _mm_or_si128(pkt_mb3, rss_hash3);
+				pkt_mb2 = _mm_or_si128(pkt_mb2, rss_hash2);
+				pkt_mb1 = _mm_or_si128(pkt_mb1, rss_hash1);
+				pkt_mb0 = _mm_or_si128(pkt_mb0, rss_hash0);
+			} /* if() on RSS hash parsing */
+
+			if (rxq->vsi->adapter->pf.dev_data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads &
+							RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN) {
+									/* L2TAG2_2 */
+				__m128i vlan_tci3 = _mm_slli_si128(descs_bh[3], 4);
+				__m128i vlan_tci2 = _mm_slli_si128(descs_bh[2], 4);
+				__m128i vlan_tci1 = _mm_slli_si128(descs_bh[1], 4);
+				__m128i vlan_tci0 = _mm_slli_si128(descs_bh[0], 4);
+
+				const __m128i vlan_tci_msk = _mm_set_epi32(0, 0xFFFF0000, 0, 0);
+
+				vlan_tci3 = _mm_and_si128(vlan_tci3, vlan_tci_msk);
+				vlan_tci2 = _mm_and_si128(vlan_tci2, vlan_tci_msk);
+				vlan_tci1 = _mm_and_si128(vlan_tci1, vlan_tci_msk);
+				vlan_tci0 = _mm_and_si128(vlan_tci0, vlan_tci_msk);
+
+				pkt_mb3 = _mm_or_si128(pkt_mb3, vlan_tci3);
+				pkt_mb2 = _mm_or_si128(pkt_mb2, vlan_tci2);
+				pkt_mb1 = _mm_or_si128(pkt_mb1, vlan_tci1);
+				pkt_mb0 = _mm_or_si128(pkt_mb0, vlan_tci0);
+				}
+		}
+		ice_rx_desc_to_olflags_v(rxq, descs, descs_bh, &rx_pkts[pos]);
+#else
+		ice_rx_desc_to_olflags_v(rxq, descs, &rx_pkts[pos]);
 #endif
 
 		/* C.2 get 4 pkts staterr value  */
-- 
2.34.1

RE: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq

[Ye, MingjinX]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
> Sent: 2022年11月6日 18:33
> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; lihuisong (C)
> <lihuisong@huawei.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Singh, Aman
> Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
> 
> On 11/4/22 14:33, Ye, MingjinX wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> >> Sent: 2022年11月4日 18:18
> >> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> >> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Singh,
> >> Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
> >> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
> >>
> >>
> >> 在 2022/11/4 16:21, Ye, MingjinX 写道:
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> >>>> Sent: 2022年11月3日 15:01
> >>>> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> >>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Singh,
> >>>> Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
> >>>> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
> >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 在 2022/11/3 9:28, Ye, MingjinX 写道:
> >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> >>>>>> Sent: 2022年10月28日 10:09
> >>>>>> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> >>>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>;
> >>>>>> Singh, Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
> >>>>>> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 在 2022/10/27 19:02, Ye, MingjinX 写道:
> >>>>>>> Hi lihuisong,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This means that queue offloads need to update by recalling
> >>>>>>> dev_configure and setup target queues.
> >>>>>> Why not update queue offloads in PMD?
> >>>>>>> Can you tell me, where is the limitation?
> >>>>>> According to other Rx/Tx offload configurations, this may not be
> >>>>>> a
> >>>> limitation.
> >>>>>> But it seems to create a dependency on user usage.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Port VLAN releated offloads are set by ethdev ops. There is no
> >>>>>> requirement in ehedev layer that this port needs to stopped when
> >>>>>> set
> >>>> these offloads.
> >>>>>> Now it depends on user does recall dev_configure and setup queues
> >>>>>> to update queue offloads because of setting these offloads.
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>> Mingjin
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>>> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> >>>>>>>> Sent: 2022年10月26日 17:53
> >>>>>>>> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> >>>>>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>;
> >>>>>>>> Singh, Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
> >>>>>>>> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
> >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of
> >>>>>>>> rxq
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 在 2022/10/27 1:10, Mingjin Ye 写道:
> >>>>>>>>> After setting vlan offload in testpmd, the result is not
> >>>>>>>>> updated to rxq. Therefore, the queue needs to be reconfigured
> >>>>>>>>> after executing the "vlan offload" related commands.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Fixes: a47aa8b97afe ("app/testpmd: add vlan offload support")
> >>>>>>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
> >>>>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>>>>       app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 1 +
> >>>>>>>>>       1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> >>>>>>>>> index 17be2de402..ce125f549f 100644
> >>>>>>>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> >>>>>>>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> >>>>>>>>> @@ -4133,6 +4133,7 @@ cmd_vlan_offload_parsed(void
> >>>> *parsed_result,
> >>>>>>>>>       	else
> >>>>>>>>>       		vlan_extend_set(port_id, on);
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> +	cmd_reconfig_device_queue(port_id, 1, 1);
> >>>>>> In addition, I have some comments:
> >>>>>> 1) Normally, the parsed function of testpmd command needed to
> >>>>>> re-config port and queue needs to check if port status is STOPED.
> >>>>>> Why don't you add this check?
> >>>>> The check is exist.
> >>>> Where is the check? Currently, it seems that this check does not
> >>>> exist in the this command parsed function.
> >>> Check if the port is forwarded, in the source file test-pmd.c:2835.
> >> I don't understand why you mention the check in start_port(). It
> >> should be done in command parsed link other command.
> >
> > The command types include configuration and show these two types of
> commands.
> > show commands: There is no need to judge whether the port has stopped
> working.
> > configuration commands: Not all commands need to stop the port, there
> will be judgment if necessary.
> >
> > Hi, @andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru can you please help review this
> patch? Thanks.
> 
> cmd_vlan_offload_parsed() goes down to the follow ethdev API
> functions:
>   - rte_eth_dev_set_vlan_strip_on_queue()
>   - rte_eth_dev_set_vlan_offload()
> There functions may change settings when port is started, running and
> processing traffic. And, as far as I know, it is the primary goal of these
> functions. So, we should not require application to do stop and reconfigure
> to apply these settings.
> 
> It is an interesting question what should happen if application stops and
> starts the port back. As far as I can see it is not documented and it should be
> improved. I'd say that typical application would expect that dynamically done
> changes still apply. So, it should not be an application headache. The patch
> tries to care about it on application side and it is wrong from my point of view.
> 
> Moreover, if we finally decide that application must care itself, the second
> argument should be 1 in stripq case only since other cases do not reconfigure
> Rx queue. However, it will not help anyway since
> rx_vlan_strip_set_on_queue() do not save configuration changes in testpmd
> structures.
Thanks for your answer, I will flush the offloads of the queue in pmd as you suggested. Later, a new patch will be provided.
> 
> >
> >>>>>> If the check is not exist, queue offloads are not updated until
> >>>>>> the next port stop/start command is executed. Right?
> >>>>> yes
> >>>>>> 2) Why is the queue-based VLAN offload API not used?
> >>>>> VLAN offload is a port-related configuration. If a single port is
> >>>>> changed, the associated queue needs to be all updated in
> >>>>> configuration. Therefore, there will be no additional api to configure.
> >>>>>>        Like, rte_eth_dev_set_vlan_strip_on_queue. It seems that
> >>>>>> this kind of API is
> >>>>>>        dedicated to do this.
> >>>>>>>> This means that queue offloads need to upadte by re-calling
> >>>>>>>> dev_configure and setup all queues, right?
> >>>>>>>> If it is, this adds a usage limitation.
> >>>>>>>>>       	return;
> >>>>>>>>>       }
> >>>>>>>>>
> 

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq

[Andrew Rybchenko]

On 11/4/22 14:33, Ye, MingjinX wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>> Sent: 2022年11月4日 18:18
>> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Singh, Aman
>> Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
>> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
>>
>>
>> 在 2022/11/4 16:21, Ye, MingjinX 写道:
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>>> Sent: 2022年11月3日 15:01
>>>> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Singh,
>>>> Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
>>>> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 在 2022/11/3 9:28, Ye, MingjinX 写道:
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>>>>> Sent: 2022年10月28日 10:09
>>>>>> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>>>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Singh,
>>>>>> Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
>>>>>> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 在 2022/10/27 19:02, Ye, MingjinX 写道:
>>>>>>> Hi lihuisong,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This means that queue offloads need to update by recalling
>>>>>>> dev_configure and setup target queues.
>>>>>> Why not update queue offloads in PMD?
>>>>>>> Can you tell me, where is the limitation?
>>>>>> According to other Rx/Tx offload configurations, this may not be a
>>>> limitation.
>>>>>> But it seems to create a dependency on user usage.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Port VLAN releated offloads are set by ethdev ops. There is no
>>>>>> requirement in ehedev layer that this port needs to stopped when
>>>>>> set
>>>> these offloads.
>>>>>> Now it depends on user does recall dev_configure and setup queues
>>>>>> to update queue offloads because of setting these offloads.
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Mingjin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>>>>>>> Sent: 2022年10月26日 17:53
>>>>>>>> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>>>>>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>;
>>>>>>>> Singh, Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
>>>>>>>> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 在 2022/10/27 1:10, Mingjin Ye 写道:
>>>>>>>>> After setting vlan offload in testpmd, the result is not updated
>>>>>>>>> to rxq. Therefore, the queue needs to be reconfigured after
>>>>>>>>> executing the "vlan offload" related commands.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Fixes: a47aa8b97afe ("app/testpmd: add vlan offload support")
>>>>>>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>       app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 1 +
>>>>>>>>>       1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>>>>>>>> index 17be2de402..ce125f549f 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>>>>>>>> @@ -4133,6 +4133,7 @@ cmd_vlan_offload_parsed(void
>>>> *parsed_result,
>>>>>>>>>       	else
>>>>>>>>>       		vlan_extend_set(port_id, on);
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +	cmd_reconfig_device_queue(port_id, 1, 1);
>>>>>> In addition, I have some comments:
>>>>>> 1) Normally, the parsed function of testpmd command needed to
>>>>>> re-config port and queue needs to check if port status is STOPED.
>>>>>> Why don't you add this check?
>>>>> The check is exist.
>>>> Where is the check? Currently, it seems that this check does not
>>>> exist in the this command parsed function.
>>> Check if the port is forwarded, in the source file test-pmd.c:2835.
>> I don't understand why you mention the check in start_port(). It should be
>> done in command parsed link other command.
> 
> The command types include configuration and show these two types of commands.
> show commands: There is no need to judge whether the port has stopped working.
> configuration commands: Not all commands need to stop the port, there will be judgment if necessary.
> 
> Hi, @andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru can you please help review this patch? Thanks.

cmd_vlan_offload_parsed() goes down to the follow ethdev API
functions:
  - rte_eth_dev_set_vlan_strip_on_queue()
  - rte_eth_dev_set_vlan_offload()
There functions may change settings when port is started, running and 
processing traffic. And, as far as I know, it
is the primary goal of these functions. So, we should not
require application to do stop and reconfigure to apply
these settings.

It is an interesting question what should happen if
application stops and starts the port back. As far as I can
see it is not documented and it should be improved. I'd say
that typical application would expect that dynamically done
changes still apply. So, it should not be an application
headache. The patch tries to care about it on application
side and it is wrong from my point of view.

Moreover, if we finally decide that application must care
itself, the second argument should be 1 in stripq case only
since other cases do not reconfigure Rx queue. However,
it will not help anyway since rx_vlan_strip_set_on_queue()
do not save configuration changes in testpmd structures.

> 
>>>>>> If the check is not exist, queue offloads are not updated until the
>>>>>> next port stop/start command is executed. Right?
>>>>> yes
>>>>>> 2) Why is the queue-based VLAN offload API not used?
>>>>> VLAN offload is a port-related configuration. If a single port is
>>>>> changed, the associated queue needs to be all updated in
>>>>> configuration. Therefore, there will be no additional api to configure.
>>>>>>        Like, rte_eth_dev_set_vlan_strip_on_queue. It seems that this
>>>>>> kind of API is
>>>>>>        dedicated to do this.
>>>>>>>> This means that queue offloads need to upadte by re-calling
>>>>>>>> dev_configure and setup all queues, right?
>>>>>>>> If it is, this adds a usage limitation.
>>>>>>>>>       	return;
>>>>>>>>>       }
>>>>>>>>>

RE: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq

[Ye, MingjinX]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> Sent: 2022年11月4日 18:18
> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Singh, Aman
> Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
> 
> 
> 在 2022/11/4 16:21, Ye, MingjinX 写道:
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> >> Sent: 2022年11月3日 15:01
> >> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> >> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Singh,
> >> Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
> >> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
> >>
> >>
> >> 在 2022/11/3 9:28, Ye, MingjinX 写道:
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> >>>> Sent: 2022年10月28日 10:09
> >>>> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> >>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Singh,
> >>>> Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
> >>>> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
> >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 在 2022/10/27 19:02, Ye, MingjinX 写道:
> >>>>> Hi lihuisong,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This means that queue offloads need to update by recalling
> >>>>> dev_configure and setup target queues.
> >>>> Why not update queue offloads in PMD?
> >>>>> Can you tell me, where is the limitation?
> >>>> According to other Rx/Tx offload configurations, this may not be a
> >> limitation.
> >>>> But it seems to create a dependency on user usage.
> >>>>
> >>>> Port VLAN releated offloads are set by ethdev ops. There is no
> >>>> requirement in ehedev layer that this port needs to stopped when
> >>>> set
> >> these offloads.
> >>>> Now it depends on user does recall dev_configure and setup queues
> >>>> to update queue offloads because of setting these offloads.
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Mingjin
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> >>>>>> Sent: 2022年10月26日 17:53
> >>>>>> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> >>>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>;
> >>>>>> Singh, Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
> >>>>>> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 在 2022/10/27 1:10, Mingjin Ye 写道:
> >>>>>>> After setting vlan offload in testpmd, the result is not updated
> >>>>>>> to rxq. Therefore, the queue needs to be reconfigured after
> >>>>>>> executing the "vlan offload" related commands.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Fixes: a47aa8b97afe ("app/testpmd: add vlan offload support")
> >>>>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
> >>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>>      app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 1 +
> >>>>>>>      1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> >>>>>>> index 17be2de402..ce125f549f 100644
> >>>>>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> >>>>>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> >>>>>>> @@ -4133,6 +4133,7 @@ cmd_vlan_offload_parsed(void
> >> *parsed_result,
> >>>>>>>      	else
> >>>>>>>      		vlan_extend_set(port_id, on);
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +	cmd_reconfig_device_queue(port_id, 1, 1);
> >>>> In addition, I have some comments:
> >>>> 1) Normally, the parsed function of testpmd command needed to
> >>>> re-config port and queue needs to check if port status is STOPED.
> >>>> Why don't you add this check?
> >>> The check is exist.
> >> Where is the check? Currently, it seems that this check does not
> >> exist in the this command parsed function.
> > Check if the port is forwarded, in the source file test-pmd.c:2835.
> I don't understand why you mention the check in start_port(). It should be
> done in command parsed link other command.

The command types include configuration and show these two types of commands.
show commands: There is no need to judge whether the port has stopped working.
configuration commands: Not all commands need to stop the port, there will be judgment if necessary.

Hi, @andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru can you please help review this patch? Thanks.

> >>>> If the check is not exist, queue offloads are not updated until the
> >>>> next port stop/start command is executed. Right?
> >>> yes
> >>>> 2) Why is the queue-based VLAN offload API not used?
> >>> VLAN offload is a port-related configuration. If a single port is
> >>> changed, the associated queue needs to be all updated in
> >>> configuration. Therefore, there will be no additional api to configure.
> >>>>       Like, rte_eth_dev_set_vlan_strip_on_queue. It seems that this
> >>>> kind of API is
> >>>>       dedicated to do this.
> >>>>>> This means that queue offloads need to upadte by re-calling
> >>>>>> dev_configure and setup all queues, right?
> >>>>>> If it is, this adds a usage limitation.
> >>>>>>>      	return;
> >>>>>>>      }
> >>>>>>>

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq

[lihuisong (C)]

在 2022/11/4 16:21, Ye, MingjinX 写道:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>> Sent: 2022年11月3日 15:01
>> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Singh, Aman
>> Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
>> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
>>
>>
>> 在 2022/11/3 9:28, Ye, MingjinX 写道:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>>> Sent: 2022年10月28日 10:09
>>>> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Singh,
>>>> Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
>>>> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 在 2022/10/27 19:02, Ye, MingjinX 写道:
>>>>> Hi lihuisong,
>>>>>
>>>>> This means that queue offloads need to update by recalling
>>>>> dev_configure and setup target queues.
>>>> Why not update queue offloads in PMD?
>>>>> Can you tell me, where is the limitation?
>>>> According to other Rx/Tx offload configurations, this may not be a
>> limitation.
>>>> But it seems to create a dependency on user usage.
>>>>
>>>> Port VLAN releated offloads are set by ethdev ops. There is no
>>>> requirement in ehedev layer that this port needs to stopped when set
>> these offloads.
>>>> Now it depends on user does recall dev_configure and setup queues to
>>>> update queue offloads because of setting these offloads.
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Mingjin
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>>>>> Sent: 2022年10月26日 17:53
>>>>>> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>>>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Singh,
>>>>>> Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
>>>>>> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 在 2022/10/27 1:10, Mingjin Ye 写道:
>>>>>>> After setting vlan offload in testpmd, the result is not updated
>>>>>>> to rxq. Therefore, the queue needs to be reconfigured after
>>>>>>> executing the "vlan offload" related commands.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fixes: a47aa8b97afe ("app/testpmd: add vlan offload support")
>>>>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>      app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 1 +
>>>>>>>      1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c index
>>>>>>> 17be2de402..ce125f549f 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>>>>>> @@ -4133,6 +4133,7 @@ cmd_vlan_offload_parsed(void
>> *parsed_result,
>>>>>>>      	else
>>>>>>>      		vlan_extend_set(port_id, on);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +	cmd_reconfig_device_queue(port_id, 1, 1);
>>>> In addition, I have some comments:
>>>> 1) Normally, the parsed function of testpmd command needed to
>>>> re-config port and queue needs to check if port status is STOPED. Why
>>>> don't you add this check?
>>> The check is exist.
>> Where is the check? Currently, it seems that this check does not exist in the
>> this command parsed function.
> Check if the port is forwarded, in the source file test-pmd.c:2835.
I don't understand why you mention the check in start_port(). It should 
be done in command parsed link other command.
>>>> If the check is not exist, queue offloads are not updated until the
>>>> next port stop/start command is executed. Right?
>>> yes
>>>> 2) Why is the queue-based VLAN offload API not used?
>>> VLAN offload is a port-related configuration. If a single port is
>>> changed, the associated queue needs to be all updated in
>>> configuration. Therefore, there will be no additional api to configure.
>>>>       Like, rte_eth_dev_set_vlan_strip_on_queue. It seems that this
>>>> kind of API is
>>>>       dedicated to do this.
>>>>>> This means that queue offloads need to upadte by re-calling
>>>>>> dev_configure and setup all queues, right?
>>>>>> If it is, this adds a usage limitation.
>>>>>>>      	return;
>>>>>>>      }
>>>>>>>

RE: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq

[Ye, MingjinX]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> Sent: 2022年11月3日 15:01
> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Singh, Aman
> Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
> 
> 
> 在 2022/11/3 9:28, Ye, MingjinX 写道:
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> >> Sent: 2022年10月28日 10:09
> >> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> >> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Singh,
> >> Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
> >> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
> >>
> >>
> >> 在 2022/10/27 19:02, Ye, MingjinX 写道:
> >>> Hi lihuisong,
> >>>
> >>> This means that queue offloads need to update by recalling
> >>> dev_configure and setup target queues.
> >> Why not update queue offloads in PMD?
> >>> Can you tell me, where is the limitation?
> >> According to other Rx/Tx offload configurations, this may not be a
> limitation.
> >> But it seems to create a dependency on user usage.
> >>
> >> Port VLAN releated offloads are set by ethdev ops. There is no
> >> requirement in ehedev layer that this port needs to stopped when set
> these offloads.
> >> Now it depends on user does recall dev_configure and setup queues to
> >> update queue offloads because of setting these offloads.
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Mingjin
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> >>>> Sent: 2022年10月26日 17:53
> >>>> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> >>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Singh,
> >>>> Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
> >>>> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
> >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 在 2022/10/27 1:10, Mingjin Ye 写道:
> >>>>> After setting vlan offload in testpmd, the result is not updated
> >>>>> to rxq. Therefore, the queue needs to be reconfigured after
> >>>>> executing the "vlan offload" related commands.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Fixes: a47aa8b97afe ("app/testpmd: add vlan offload support")
> >>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>>     app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 1 +
> >>>>>     1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c index
> >>>>> 17be2de402..ce125f549f 100644
> >>>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> >>>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> >>>>> @@ -4133,6 +4133,7 @@ cmd_vlan_offload_parsed(void
> *parsed_result,
> >>>>>     	else
> >>>>>     		vlan_extend_set(port_id, on);
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +	cmd_reconfig_device_queue(port_id, 1, 1);
> >> In addition, I have some comments:
> >> 1) Normally, the parsed function of testpmd command needed to
> >> re-config port and queue needs to check if port status is STOPED. Why
> >> don't you add this check?
> > The check is exist.
> Where is the check? Currently, it seems that this check does not exist in the
> this command parsed function.
Check if the port is forwarded, in the source file test-pmd.c:2835.
> >> If the check is not exist, queue offloads are not updated until the
> >> next port stop/start command is executed. Right?
> > yes
> >> 2) Why is the queue-based VLAN offload API not used?
> > VLAN offload is a port-related configuration. If a single port is
> > changed, the associated queue needs to be all updated in
> > configuration. Therefore, there will be no additional api to configure.
> >>      Like, rte_eth_dev_set_vlan_strip_on_queue. It seems that this
> >> kind of API is
> >>      dedicated to do this.
> >>>> This means that queue offloads need to upadte by re-calling
> >>>> dev_configure and setup all queues, right?
> >>>> If it is, this adds a usage limitation.
> >>>>>     	return;
> >>>>>     }
> >>>>>

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq

[lihuisong (C)]

在 2022/11/3 9:28, Ye, MingjinX 写道:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>> Sent: 2022年10月28日 10:09
>> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Singh, Aman
>> Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
>> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
>>
>>
>> 在 2022/10/27 19:02, Ye, MingjinX 写道:
>>> Hi lihuisong,
>>>
>>> This means that queue offloads need to update by recalling
>>> dev_configure and setup target queues.
>> Why not update queue offloads in PMD?
>>> Can you tell me, where is the limitation?
>> According to other Rx/Tx offload configurations, this may not be a limitation.
>> But it seems to create a dependency on user usage.
>>
>> Port VLAN releated offloads are set by ethdev ops. There is no requirement
>> in ehedev layer that this port needs to stopped when set these offloads.
>> Now it depends on user does recall dev_configure and setup queues to
>> update queue offloads because of setting these offloads.
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mingjin
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>>> Sent: 2022年10月26日 17:53
>>>> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Singh,
>>>> Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
>>>> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 在 2022/10/27 1:10, Mingjin Ye 写道:
>>>>> After setting vlan offload in testpmd, the result is not updated to
>>>>> rxq. Therefore, the queue needs to be reconfigured after executing
>>>>> the "vlan offload" related commands.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: a47aa8b97afe ("app/testpmd: add vlan offload support")
>>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>     app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 1 +
>>>>>     1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c index
>>>>> 17be2de402..ce125f549f 100644
>>>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>>>> @@ -4133,6 +4133,7 @@ cmd_vlan_offload_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>>>>>     	else
>>>>>     		vlan_extend_set(port_id, on);
>>>>>
>>>>> +	cmd_reconfig_device_queue(port_id, 1, 1);
>> In addition, I have some comments:
>> 1) Normally, the parsed function of testpmd command needed to re-config
>> port and queue needs to check if port status is STOPED. Why don't you add
>> this check?
> The check is exist.
Where is the check? Currently, it seems that this check does not exist
in the this command parsed function.
>> If the check is not exist, queue offloads are not updated until the next port
>> stop/start command is executed. Right?
> yes
>> 2) Why is the queue-based VLAN offload API not used?
> VLAN offload is a port-related configuration. If a single port is changed,
> the associated queue needs to be all updated in configuration. Therefore,
> there will be no additional api to configure.
>>      Like, rte_eth_dev_set_vlan_strip_on_queue. It seems that this kind of API
>> is
>>      dedicated to do this.
>>>> This means that queue offloads need to upadte by re-calling
>>>> dev_configure and setup all queues, right?
>>>> If it is, this adds a usage limitation.
>>>>>     	return;
>>>>>     }
>>>>>

RE: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq

[Ye, MingjinX]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> Sent: 2022年10月28日 10:09
> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Singh, Aman
> Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
> 
> 
> 在 2022/10/27 19:02, Ye, MingjinX 写道:
> > Hi lihuisong,
> >
> > This means that queue offloads need to update by recalling
> > dev_configure and setup target queues.
> Why not update queue offloads in PMD?
> > Can you tell me, where is the limitation?
> According to other Rx/Tx offload configurations, this may not be a limitation.
> But it seems to create a dependency on user usage.
> 
> Port VLAN releated offloads are set by ethdev ops. There is no requirement
> in ehedev layer that this port needs to stopped when set these offloads.
> Now it depends on user does recall dev_configure and setup queues to
> update queue offloads because of setting these offloads.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mingjin
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> >> Sent: 2022年10月26日 17:53
> >> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> >> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Singh,
> >> Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
> >> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
> >>
> >>
> >> 在 2022/10/27 1:10, Mingjin Ye 写道:
> >>> After setting vlan offload in testpmd, the result is not updated to
> >>> rxq. Therefore, the queue needs to be reconfigured after executing
> >>> the "vlan offload" related commands.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: a47aa8b97afe ("app/testpmd: add vlan offload support")
> >>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>    app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 1 +
> >>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c index
> >>> 17be2de402..ce125f549f 100644
> >>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> >>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> >>> @@ -4133,6 +4133,7 @@ cmd_vlan_offload_parsed(void *parsed_result,
> >>>    	else
> >>>    		vlan_extend_set(port_id, on);
> >>>
> >>> +	cmd_reconfig_device_queue(port_id, 1, 1);
> In addition, I have some comments:
> 1) Normally, the parsed function of testpmd command needed to re-config
> port and queue needs to check if port status is STOPED. Why don't you add
> this check?
The check is exist.
> If the check is not exist, queue offloads are not updated until the next port
> stop/start command is executed. Right?
yes
> 
> 2) Why is the queue-based VLAN offload API not used?
VLAN offload is a port-related configuration. If a single port is changed,
the associated queue needs to be all updated in configuration. Therefore, 
there will be no additional api to configure.
>     Like, rte_eth_dev_set_vlan_strip_on_queue. It seems that this kind of API
> is
>     dedicated to do this.
> >> This means that queue offloads need to upadte by re-calling
> >> dev_configure and setup all queues, right?
> >> If it is, this adds a usage limitation.
> >>>    	return;
> >>>    }
> >>>

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq

[lihuisong (C)]

在 2022/10/27 19:02, Ye, MingjinX 写道:
> Hi lihuisong,
>
> This means that queue offloads need to update by recalling dev_configure
> and setup target queues.
Why not update queue offloads in PMD?
> Can you tell me, where is the limitation?
According to other Rx/Tx offload configurations, this may not be a 
limitation.
But it seems to create a dependency on user usage.

Port VLAN releated offloads are set by ethdev ops. There is no requirement
in ehedev layer that this port needs to stopped when set these offloads.
Now it depends on user does recall dev_configure and setup queues to update
queue offloads because of setting these offloads.
>
> Thanks,
> Mingjin
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>> Sent: 2022年10月26日 17:53
>> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Singh, Aman
>> Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
>> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
>>
>>
>> 在 2022/10/27 1:10, Mingjin Ye 写道:
>>> After setting vlan offload in testpmd, the result is not updated to
>>> rxq. Therefore, the queue needs to be reconfigured after executing the
>>> "vlan offload" related commands.
>>>
>>> Fixes: a47aa8b97afe ("app/testpmd: add vlan offload support")
>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>    app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 1 +
>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c index
>>> 17be2de402..ce125f549f 100644
>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>> @@ -4133,6 +4133,7 @@ cmd_vlan_offload_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>>>    	else
>>>    		vlan_extend_set(port_id, on);
>>>
>>> +	cmd_reconfig_device_queue(port_id, 1, 1);
In addition, I have some comments:
1) Normally, the parsed function of testpmd command needed to re-config 
port and
queue needs to check if port status is STOPED. Why don't you add this check?
If the check is not exist, queue offloads are not updated until the next 
port
stop/start command is executed. Right?

2) Why is the queue-based VLAN offload API not used?
    Like, rte_eth_dev_set_vlan_strip_on_queue. It seems that this kind 
of API is
    dedicated to do this.
>> This means that queue offloads need to upadte by re-calling dev_configure
>> and setup all queues, right?
>> If it is, this adds a usage limitation.
>>>    	return;
>>>    }
>>>

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq

[Singh, Aman Deep]

On 10/27/2022 2:06 PM, Huang, ZhiminX wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2022 1:10 AM
>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Ye, MingjinX
>> <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; Singh, Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>;
>> Zhang, Yuying <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
>>
>> After setting vlan offload in testpmd, the result is not updated to rxq. Therefore,
>> the queue needs to be reconfigured after executing the "vlan offload" related
>> commands.
>>
>> Fixes: a47aa8b97afe ("app/testpmd: add vlan offload support")
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>

Acked-by: Aman Singh<aman.deep.singh@intel.com>

>> ---
> Tested-by: Zhimin Huang <zhiminx.huang@intel.com >
>
>

RE: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq

[Ye, MingjinX]

Hi All,

Could you please review and provide suggestions if any.

Thanks,
Mingjin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
> Sent: 2022年10月25日 1:27
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Ye, MingjinX
> <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; Singh, Aman Deep
> <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
> 
> After setting vlan offload in testpmd, the result is not updated to rxq.
> Therefore, the queue needs to be reconfigured after executing the "vlan
> offload" related commands.
> 
> Fixes: a47aa8b97afe ("app/testpmd: add vlan offload support")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
> ---
>  app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c index
> 17be2de402..ce125f549f 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> @@ -4133,6 +4133,7 @@ cmd_vlan_offload_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>  	else
>  		vlan_extend_set(port_id, on);
> 
> +	cmd_reconfig_device_queue(port_id, 1, 1);
>  	return;
>  }
> 
> --
> 2.34.1

RE: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq

[Ye, MingjinX]

Hi lihuisong,

This means that queue offloads need to update by recalling dev_configure
and setup target queues.
Can you tell me, where is the limitation?

Thanks,
Mingjin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> Sent: 2022年10月26日 17:53
> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Singh, Aman
> Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
> 
> 
> 在 2022/10/27 1:10, Mingjin Ye 写道:
> > After setting vlan offload in testpmd, the result is not updated to
> > rxq. Therefore, the queue needs to be reconfigured after executing the
> > "vlan offload" related commands.
> >
> > Fixes: a47aa8b97afe ("app/testpmd: add vlan offload support")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
> > ---
> >   app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 1 +
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c index
> > 17be2de402..ce125f549f 100644
> > --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > @@ -4133,6 +4133,7 @@ cmd_vlan_offload_parsed(void *parsed_result,
> >   	else
> >   		vlan_extend_set(port_id, on);
> >
> > +	cmd_reconfig_device_queue(port_id, 1, 1);
> This means that queue offloads need to upadte by re-calling dev_configure
> and setup all queues, right?
> If it is, this adds a usage limitation.
> >   	return;
> >   }
> >

RE: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq

[Huang, ZhiminX]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2022 1:10 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Ye, MingjinX
> <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; Singh, Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>;
> Zhang, Yuying <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq
> 
> After setting vlan offload in testpmd, the result is not updated to rxq. Therefore,
> the queue needs to be reconfigured after executing the "vlan offload" related
> commands.
> 
> Fixes: a47aa8b97afe ("app/testpmd: add vlan offload support")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
> ---
Tested-by: Zhimin Huang <zhiminx.huang@intel.com >

[PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq

[Mingjin Ye]

After setting vlan offload in testpmd, the result is not updated
to rxq. Therefore, the queue needs to be reconfigured after
executing the "vlan offload" related commands.

Fixes: a47aa8b97afe ("app/testpmd: add vlan offload support")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
---
 app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
index 17be2de402..ce125f549f 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
@@ -4133,6 +4133,7 @@ cmd_vlan_offload_parsed(void *parsed_result,
 	else
 		vlan_extend_set(port_id, on);
 
+	cmd_reconfig_device_queue(port_id, 1, 1);
 	return;
 }
 
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq

[lihuisong (C)]

在 2022/10/27 1:10, Mingjin Ye 写道:
> After setting vlan offload in testpmd, the result is not updated
> to rxq. Therefore, the queue needs to be reconfigured after
> executing the "vlan offload" related commands.
>
> Fixes: a47aa8b97afe ("app/testpmd: add vlan offload support")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
> ---
>   app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> index 17be2de402..ce125f549f 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> @@ -4133,6 +4133,7 @@ cmd_vlan_offload_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>   	else
>   		vlan_extend_set(port_id, on);
>   
> +	cmd_reconfig_device_queue(port_id, 1, 1);
This means that queue offloads need to upadte by re-calling 
dev_configure and setup all queues, right?
If it is, this adds a usage limitation.
>   	return;
>   }
>   

[PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq

[Mingjin Ye]

After setting vlan offload in testpmd, the result is not updated
to rxq. Therefore, the queue needs to be reconfigured after
executing the "vlan offload" related commands.

Fixes: a47aa8b97afe ("app/testpmd: add vlan offload support")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
---
 app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
index 17be2de402..ce125f549f 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
@@ -4133,6 +4133,7 @@ cmd_vlan_offload_parsed(void *parsed_result,
 	else
 		vlan_extend_set(port_id, on);
 
+	cmd_reconfig_device_queue(port_id, 1, 1);
 	return;
 }
 
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: fix vlan offload of rxq

[Mingjin Ye]

After setting vlan offload in testpmd, the result is not updated
to rxq. Therefore, the queue needs to be reconfigured after
executing the "vlan offload" related commands.

Fixes: a47aa8b97afe ("app/testpmd: add vlan offload support")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
---
 app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
index 17be2de402..ce125f549f 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
@@ -4133,6 +4133,7 @@ cmd_vlan_offload_parsed(void *parsed_result,
 	else
 		vlan_extend_set(port_id, on);
 
+	cmd_reconfig_device_queue(port_id, 1, 1);
 	return;
 }
 
-- 
2.34.1