From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED80A00C4; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 00:45:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7D240151; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 00:45:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pf1-f169.google.com (mail-pf1-f169.google.com [209.85.210.169]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4072040146 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 00:45:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf1-f169.google.com with SMTP id 17so1699936pfv.4 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 15:45:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=FCNSe2Rrj0bDIE8tR7bwsJmytpU0giXhQZCdVwli9yE=; b=A/s6xZ9GagIqlNC4Ev0bN/MPkkyb4YyKU0zk14sgUBlFNfssYQ/OA5SM9lgUrAyFQv L5T43bYNqjWSZpn1NYsTuJiv4hcxVxxX2kvYPvJWTEQh99vZmHEppzIO194s7lKoPjNR q/5AKwtuICwET50gD519Bp0ktbgoXrm2IQfmAvobH7K5NYb2uv1dtzZbrR//RdqME6Yp wWtEt5YaJEIEvxC23qPUYr/um5A1dwem9xaz/+O0yCtuEYXJtLVMP/NkNGZTNq3lGMu8 0BiXclCRxmCOvxysVNrZWDGiBHFl6CW8SurvhZSuDp/UjlADE64pBpMKWqAIjS7ttzcS kcEQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=FCNSe2Rrj0bDIE8tR7bwsJmytpU0giXhQZCdVwli9yE=; b=i/5O8LndspBY9Tga9K2GbIWDzaEQPaVlsHyFgtdVOOqr0Bzz4B7Yin9G016h2w/ysk pwVtxnkVV/Qk5WF1pngwVuOGlIARINQ9hjgKMf+Kja/ad1knknr26Ho9hNMy4uh5/YCI w4BQ4ZCuW82g+dzgBQvdSnt6SSf6R45yJe5ngrgFlhKSORkQZCCq7gk7zadAKPZGZjcU w2PmNvxXqx5kWkdBD1AbJErUg4IlC/tPF9HH6vraQgJamJJmflkjRvrUtyd/5chqe3TF k/Qq2n8aIcSsHl5OxqtkWiwoCoy77h7zYmAmyU0u5pxvpfpF8rggPnTRABf3NSrq69ud xVRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf26gY72Fz91FzB92BJvJxPLES0aPo4WvmEeWn5/xJlZOrvLDStu lD12QQxerkUOy0BLFy1BUzmOeA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6SZQ0kSFZh4wWvaZgST/+VGx10dWFMXDGnT/ibK5YmyLTEGcVivvV85twIpLg4wB0fm5gufw== X-Received: by 2002:a62:584:0:b0:55a:a7a5:b597 with SMTP id 126-20020a620584000000b0055aa7a5b597mr1715478pff.71.1666997123191; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 15:45:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-120-218.wavecable.com. [204.195.120.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u66-20020a627945000000b0056bb36c047asm3288984pfc.105.2022.10.28.15.45.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 28 Oct 2022 15:45:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 15:45:20 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: David Miller Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Mathew S Thoennes , Konstantin Ananyev , Xiaoyun Li , Aman Singh , Yuying Zhang , Olivier Matz , Yipeng Wang , Sameh Gobriel , Bruce Richardson , Vladimir Medvedkin , Neil Horman , Dmitry Kozlyuk , Beilei Xing , Matan Azrad , Viacheslav Ovsiienko , Haiyue Wang , Jakub Grajciar , Harman Kalra Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for IBM Z s390x Message-ID: <20221028154520.40d58c68@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <20221028215240.103365-1-dmiller423@gmail.com> References: <20221028215240.103365-1-dmiller423@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 17:52:40 -0400 David Miller wrote: > diff --git a/app/test/test_cmdline.c b/app/test/test_cmdline.c > index 115bee966d..e0720ff345 100644 > --- a/app/test/test_cmdline.c > +++ b/app/test/test_cmdline.c > @@ -10,21 +10,21 @@ > static int > test_cmdline(void) > { > - printf("Testind parsing ethernet addresses...\n"); > + printf("Testing parsing ethernet addresses...\n"); > if (test_parse_etheraddr_valid() < 0) > return -1; > if (test_parse_etheraddr_invalid_data() < 0) > return -1; > if (test_parse_etheraddr_invalid_param() < 0) > return -1; > - printf("Testind parsing port lists...\n"); > + printf("Testing parsing port lists...\n"); > if (test_parse_portlist_valid() < 0) > return -1; > if (test_parse_portlist_invalid_data() < 0) > return -1; > if (test_parse_portlist_invalid_param() < 0) > return -1; > - printf("Testind parsing numbers...\n"); > + printf("Testing parsing numbers...\n"); > if (test_parse_num_valid() < 0) > return -1; > if (test_parse_num_invalid_data() < 0) This spelling fix should be its own patch, not related to s390x