From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D35FA00C2;
Thu, 3 Nov 2022 19:33:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCD542D0E;
Thu, 3 Nov 2022 19:33:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-pj1-f53.google.com (mail-pj1-f53.google.com
[209.85.216.53]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB021410EF
for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 19:33:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pj1-f53.google.com with SMTP id
c15-20020a17090a1d0f00b0021365864446so2607865pjd.4
for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 11:33:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=networkplumber-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date
:message-id:reply-to;
bh=XgcYqnmy8Rb/8MKwoKca/WH76Qb7kDzCvqcI4xdOVOc=;
b=LBciBfD6rziJcYFs6SboGnKCLfxq8EUEtdfkWDmNzWCLk5cqv12bVoDIDNYJEh+8UM
rWJ5N557ueFoLux0CsIXr7TkYci1tA0JKn6yoD3n96ZeX5TjaTCGabaEkQBG5PnV9NQQ
51n7Hagt4c4jGuVOtmeMXsQnXxx+F12Y9ex8fwPBEt3fVRekVp6xkRsseODW21bOAXAo
hP4+rh/bYXmTKmIZ9oSDtlOvkzEHzVHVjr4N1LL8BzPTms969shQbUOi5GVmEcJJFHnc
zHo78GPQVtRXrA2+V8agh+/g+8DXcwYY56MiNtHWW6Uh8XlEJIGyD3w1/IOKpu3GUNnU
55lA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=XgcYqnmy8Rb/8MKwoKca/WH76Qb7kDzCvqcI4xdOVOc=;
b=UwUulqmBRYsqgJyII4FI5UHkPd4HOAdR6u2mzXLrBFje57MucHlldq3CH6h+cR7CwD
i2/5qXVw5/Gy1W114FoOUTPpJSBj+vL49qmgSsY3ghECF1/Eoc+xVMs6JMwHVAkMabXn
32htpc60ifcK2EqfsQgjuAVkg01qY9qVJhowYzP/BbRv6mhruvWQnwpfhpQmqs0Fnxi/
ZU27qmZFB/DGrw1WAHJd3eIG6OBYrylsYyxBGtIVlXCRNAoBup3m9AwBAy4H/PT6AmU4
Vs9s+aMrphM9Trjmsw7txScRyxqJfHclXN0tKNYvtdtsY6brD+3Bw1a2HRVR9u7mfokp
b1FA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf07dU/B0z/ANN4JKAkNkSI0S6BNqNb5iq3rBi/g9hHTiaVW7N2Y
9JvK8enut0PfP3jgn+zJzTZBSQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4nYcv6UHB+F8VpxPmUNS+jEpOLTq3yq8EPRX7J1CQ+NeEoo6JJT8fzKqbTqSBXAzWXTgStSQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:aa02:b0:186:9395:4e82 with SMTP id
be2-20020a170902aa0200b0018693954e82mr32103864plb.5.1667500381825;
Thu, 03 Nov 2022 11:33:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.local (204-195-120-218.wavecable.com. [204.195.120.218])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
d1-20020a170903230100b00186b04776b0sm1007044plh.118.2022.11.03.11.33.01
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Thu, 03 Nov 2022 11:33:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 11:33:00 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>,
Sameh Gobriel <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>, Bruce Richardson
<bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] test/hash: fix coverity warning
Message-ID: <20221103113300.29d85c26@hermes.local>
In-Reply-To: <20221103181339.1135127-1-vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
References: <20221103181339.1135127-1-vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
On Thu, 3 Nov 2022 18:13:38 +0000
Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com> wrote:
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + printf("rte_hash_lookup_with_hash_bulk"
> + " failed with %d\n", ret);
> + return -1;
> + }
It makes it harder to search for error messages when they are split.
Ignore any checkpatch warnings about this.
Also, shouldn't test failures be printed on stderr rather than stdout?