From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371C9A0093;
	Mon, 28 Nov 2022 18:27:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF83440691;
	Mon, 28 Nov 2022 18:27:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A56C4067E
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 18:27:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1086)
 id AE0B420B717A; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 09:27:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com AE0B420B717A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com;
 s=default; t=1669656476;
 bh=pMbYZTMrvnPWyG1o+VIZT6GtC3C9TmUteHTblyQE5Cw=;
 h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=K2M7wJiC24PbnBkiw1yRzFo7TTSnLq95id1PJEY8eaTv5DqaPVq/L1yr67sSjcL2d
 cMWKc/drUyNfPr9+1kE7rIEYaRDcw9JyOoxB26+AbBWo6cEYOP3PbbJFtVVCQ6RQds
 haMarL5GFfjYaGmxtU3nCVU0uqHSzAim5iwE7eq4=
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 09:27:56 -0800
From: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Morten =?iso-8859-1?Q?Br=F8rup?= <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count
 abstraction
Message-ID: <20221128172756.GC28869@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
References: <1669241687-18810-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
 <1669246997-30592-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
 <1669246997-30592-2-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
 <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D874F9@smartserver.smartshare.dk>
 <20221128171332.GA28869@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
 <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D87520@smartserver.smartshare.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D87520@smartserver.smartshare.dk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org

On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 06:22:10PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roretzla@linux.microsoft.com]
> > Sent: Monday, 28 November 2022 18.14
> > 
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 11:17:23AM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > > From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roretzla@linux.microsoft.com]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, 24 November 2022 00.43
> > > >
> > > > Provide an abstraction for leading and trailing zero bit counting
> > > > functions to hide compiler specific intrinsics and builtins.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > 
> > let me unpack what is being asked for here.
> > 
> > > Related functions already exist in lib/eal/include/rte_common.h.
> > 
> > i don't understand. are you saying these inline functions duplicate
> > existing bit counting functionality? if so i'll relocate any you
> > identify.
> 
> Sorry about not being clear about my intentions with the feedback.
> 
> I'm not asking for anything; I only wanted to point at the similar family of functions in rte_common.h, to make sure that you were aware of them.

oh! not a problem. i'm very keen to catch any mistakes, thought i had
missed something.

> 
> > 
> > >
> > > If some functions are missing, it would be good to add them.
> > 
> > the change here is to address a specific family of functions that are
> > impeding portability of the rte_common.h header and nothing more.
> > 
> > i'm open to having a separate mail thread discussing what other
> > functions we might want and whether to relocate code out of
> > rte_common.h
> > since that is likely to be a drawn out discussion it shouldn't be a
> > blocking dependency of this series.
> 
> I do not request any new functions; I'll leave it up to you to decide if anything would be good to add.
> 
> > 
> > >
> > > Also, it makes sense moving them out of rte_common.h.
> > 
> > thanks!
> 
> Thank you! Cleaning up is always appreciated.

yes, if i can get more rapid approvals there is a lot more in the
pipeline. i'd like gain some momentum if possible.

ty