From: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net, david.marchand@redhat.com,
mb@smartsharesystems.com, stephen@networkplumber.org
Subject: Re: help with pthread_t deprecation / api changes
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 17:12:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221202011218.GA32193@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221130225427.GA13682@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 02:54:27PM -0800, Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
> hi folks,
>
> i'd like to continue work moving to our platform abstracted rte_thread
> but ran into a hiccup. for some recent and not so recent apis it appears
> they managed to slip in without ever being __experimental.
>
> as a function of the dpdk project api/abi policy this means we can't
> change or remove some of these functions without following the
> deprecation process.
>
> the apis that are causing me immediate difficulty are
> rte_thread_setname and rte_ctrl_thread_create.
after looking in more detail at our current implementations of these
functions i would like to backtrack a little and limit the scope of
discussion to rte_thread_setname and rte_thread_getname.
as eal functions they aren't doing a good job in abstracting the
environment for applications, meaning an application would have to wrap
their use in platform conditional checks.
current status.
rte_thread_getname
* freebsd, no implementation and it appears no possible support
* linux, implementation conditional on __GLIBC_PREREQ(2, 12)
* windows, can be implemented but isn't, noop success
* fortunately is marked __rte_experimental
* called in 1 place only from eal (logging)
i would propose to present a consistent abstraction the best thing to do
here is just remove rte_thread_getname. providing a version that
requires an application to do conditional dances / compilation based on
platform gains nothing.
rte_thread_setname
* freebsd, implemented, imposes no limit on name length, suppresses errors
* linux, implementation conditional on __GLIBC_PREREQ(2, 12), imposes
limit of 16 (including terminating NUL) on name length, may return an
error
* windows, can be implemented, no explicit limit on name length, may
return errors
* unfortunately not marked __rte_experimental
i would propose to provide a replacement with the name
rte_thread_set_name with more consistent behavior across the 3 platforms.
* returns errors for platforms that return errors, but the caller
is free to ignore them.
* explicit limit of 16 (including terminating NUL) on name length,
names that are provided that exceed the limit are truncated without
error.
your feedback would be appreciated.
thanks
> i think the least painful path forward to deprecating and removing these
> apis is probably just to introduce the replacements with new names.
>
> 1. introduce functions with the following names marked as
> __experimental.
>
> rte_control_thread_create(rte_thread_t *, ...)
> rte_thread_set_name(rte_thread_t, ...)
> rte_thread_get_name(rte_thread_t, ...)
>
> along with the new functions, new unit tests will be included.
>
> 2. update dpdk internal implementation to use the new functions.
>
> 3. immediately remove the following functions from the public headers
> and issue an api deprecation notice for the functions not marked
> experimental.
>
> rte_ctrl_thread_create(pthread_t *, ...)
> rte_thread_setname(pthread_t *, ...)
>
> 4. when the new functions have their __experimental marking removed
> issue an abi deprecation notice for the functions from (2).
>
> i'm open to feedback/suggestions of a better approach if anyone has one
> to offer.
>
> thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-02 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-30 22:54 Tyler Retzlaff
2022-12-02 1:12 ` Tyler Retzlaff [this message]
2022-12-02 8:03 ` Morten Brørup
2022-12-02 19:57 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-12-09 7:53 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-12-09 16:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-12-09 20:06 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-12-09 21:13 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-12-09 23:49 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-12-11 7:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-12-12 17:45 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-12-13 8:32 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-12-13 17:38 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-12-13 19:34 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-12-13 20:39 ` Morten Brørup
2022-12-14 0:16 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-12-09 21:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-12-09 22:38 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-12-09 23:55 ` Tyler Retzlaff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221202011218.GA32193@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net \
--to=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).