From: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] telemetry: rename unsigned 64-bit enum value to uint
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 09:53:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221215175306.GB17591@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y5rr0v1FTVjKqwd1@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 09:41:38AM +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 09:30:05AM -0800, Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 06:27:24PM +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > For telemetry data, rather than having unsigned 64-bit values and signed
> > > 32-bit values, we want to just have unsigned and signed values, each
> > > stored with the max bit-width i.e. 64-bits. To that end, we rename the
> > > U64 enum entry to "UINT" to have a more generic name
> > >
> > > For backward API-level compatibility, we can use a macro to alias the
> > > old name to the new.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > diff --git a/lib/telemetry/telemetry_data.c b/lib/telemetry/telemetry_data.c
> > > index 34366ecee3..3c996484ec 100644
> > > --- a/lib/telemetry/telemetry_data.c
> > > +++ b/lib/telemetry/telemetry_data.c
> > > @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ rte_tel_data_start_array(struct rte_tel_data *d, enum rte_tel_value_type type)
> > > enum tel_container_types array_types[] = {
> > > RTE_TEL_ARRAY_STRING, /* RTE_TEL_STRING_VAL = 0 */
> > > RTE_TEL_ARRAY_INT, /* RTE_TEL_INT_VAL = 1 */
> > > - RTE_TEL_ARRAY_U64, /* RTE_TEL_u64_VAL = 2 */
> > > + RTE_TEL_ARRAY_U64, /* RTE_TEL_UINT_VAL = 2 */
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > is this supposed to be RTE_TEL_UINT_VAL?
> >
> No, only the comment is to be changed in this line. The ARRAY_ values are
> different and are internal only. Those are renamed by a later patch in the
> series.
yep, sorry about that i noticed it when i looked at later patches.
>
> /Bruce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-15 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-13 18:27 [RFC PATCH 0/7] Standardize telemetry int types Bruce Richardson
2022-12-13 18:27 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] telemetry: rename unsigned 64-bit enum value to uint Bruce Richardson
2022-12-14 17:30 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-12-15 9:41 ` Bruce Richardson
2022-12-15 17:53 ` Tyler Retzlaff [this message]
2022-12-13 18:27 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] telemetry: add uint type as alias for u64 Bruce Richardson
2022-12-14 17:38 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-12-15 9:44 ` Bruce Richardson
2022-12-15 13:36 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-12-15 13:58 ` Bruce Richardson
2022-12-19 10:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-12-19 13:22 ` Bruce Richardson
2022-12-15 17:58 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-12-15 1:49 ` lihuisong (C)
2022-12-15 9:42 ` Bruce Richardson
2022-12-15 18:02 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-12-13 18:27 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] telemetry: remove RTE prefix from internal enum values Bruce Richardson
2022-12-13 18:27 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] telemetry: make array initialization more robust Bruce Richardson
2022-12-14 17:50 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-09 12:16 ` Bruce Richardson
2023-01-09 17:49 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-10 9:11 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-12-13 18:27 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] telemetry: update json functions to use int/uint in names Bruce Richardson
2022-12-13 18:27 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] telemetry: make internal int representation 64-bits Bruce Richardson
2022-12-13 18:27 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] telemetry: change public API to use 64-bit signed values Bruce Richardson
2022-12-13 20:19 ` Morten Brørup
2022-12-14 17:53 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-12-15 2:39 ` lihuisong (C)
2023-01-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] Standardize telemetry int types Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] telemetry: remove RTE prefix from internal enum values Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] telemetry: make array initialization more robust Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] telemetry: rename unsigned 64-bit enum value to uint Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] telemetry: add uint type as alias for u64 Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] global: rename telemetry functions to newer versions Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] telemetry: mark old names of renamed fns as deprecated Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] telemetry: update json functions to use int/uint in names Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] telemetry: make internal int representation 64-bits Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] telemetry: change public API to use 64-bit signed values Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 17:41 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] Standardize telemetry int types Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 17:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] telemetry: remove RTE prefix from internal enum values Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 17:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] telemetry: make array initialization more robust Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 17:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] telemetry: rename unsigned 64-bit enum value to uint Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 17:41 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] telemetry: add uint type as alias for u64 Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 17:41 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] global: rename telemetry functions to newer versions Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 17:41 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] telemetry: mark old names of renamed fns as deprecated Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 17:41 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] telemetry: update json functions to use int/uint in names Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 17:41 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] telemetry: make internal int representation 64-bits Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 17:41 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] telemetry: change public API to use 64-bit signed values Bruce Richardson
2023-02-05 22:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-01-13 16:39 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] Standardize telemetry int types Power, Ciara
2023-02-05 23:15 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221215175306.GB17591@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net \
--to=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).