From: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, gakhil@marvell.com, trix@redhat.com,
maxime.coquelin@redhat.com
Cc: nicolas.chautru@intel.com, qi.z.zhang@intel.com,
Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 14/17] test/bbdev: remove iteration count check
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 12:22:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230302202211.170017-15-hernan.vargas@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230302202211.170017-1-hernan.vargas@intel.com>
To make the test compatible with devices that do not support early
termination, the iteration count assert can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
---
app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 24 ++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
index 635c0a5eab48..da5c3a4bc9a7 100644
--- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
+++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
@@ -2300,7 +2300,7 @@ validate_op_so_chain(struct rte_bbdev_op_data *op,
static int
validate_dec_op(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op **ops, const uint16_t n,
- struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *ref_op, const int vector_mask)
+ struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *ref_op)
{
unsigned int i;
int ret;
@@ -2311,17 +2311,12 @@ validate_dec_op(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op **ops, const uint16_t n,
struct rte_bbdev_op_turbo_dec *ops_td;
struct rte_bbdev_op_data *hard_output;
struct rte_bbdev_op_data *soft_output;
- struct rte_bbdev_op_turbo_dec *ref_td = &ref_op->turbo_dec;
for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
ops_td = &ops[i]->turbo_dec;
hard_output = &ops_td->hard_output;
soft_output = &ops_td->soft_output;
- if (vector_mask & TEST_BBDEV_VF_EXPECTED_ITER_COUNT)
- TEST_ASSERT(ops_td->iter_count <= ref_td->iter_count,
- "Returned iter_count (%d) > expected iter_count (%d)",
- ops_td->iter_count, ref_td->iter_count);
ret = check_dec_status_and_ordering(ops[i], i, ref_op->status);
TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret,
"Checking status and ordering for decoder failed");
@@ -3070,8 +3065,7 @@ dequeue_event_callback(uint16_t dev_id,
if (test_vector.op_type == RTE_BBDEV_OP_TURBO_DEC) {
struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *ref_op = tp->op_params->ref_dec_op;
- ret = validate_dec_op(tp->dec_ops, num_ops, ref_op,
- tp->op_params->vector_mask);
+ ret = validate_dec_op(tp->dec_ops, num_ops, ref_op);
/* get the max of iter_count for all dequeued ops */
for (i = 0; i < num_ops; ++i)
tp->iter_count = RTE_MAX(
@@ -3683,8 +3677,7 @@ throughput_pmd_lcore_dec(void *arg)
}
if (test_vector.op_type != RTE_BBDEV_OP_NONE) {
- ret = validate_dec_op(ops_deq, num_ops, ref_op,
- tp->op_params->vector_mask);
+ ret = validate_dec_op(ops_deq, num_ops, ref_op);
TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Validation failed!");
}
@@ -4743,7 +4736,7 @@ throughput_test(struct active_device *ad,
static int
latency_test_dec(struct rte_mempool *mempool,
struct test_buffers *bufs, struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *ref_op,
- int vector_mask, uint16_t dev_id, uint16_t queue_id,
+ uint16_t dev_id, uint16_t queue_id,
const uint16_t num_to_process, uint16_t burst_sz,
uint64_t *total_time, uint64_t *min_time, uint64_t *max_time, bool disable_et)
{
@@ -4809,8 +4802,7 @@ latency_test_dec(struct rte_mempool *mempool,
*total_time += last_time;
if (test_vector.op_type != RTE_BBDEV_OP_NONE) {
- ret = validate_dec_op(ops_deq, burst_sz, ref_op,
- vector_mask);
+ ret = validate_dec_op(ops_deq, burst_sz, ref_op);
TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Validation failed!");
}
@@ -5175,9 +5167,9 @@ validation_latency_test(struct active_device *ad,
if (op_type == RTE_BBDEV_OP_TURBO_DEC)
iter = latency_test_dec(op_params->mp, bufs,
- op_params->ref_dec_op, op_params->vector_mask,
- ad->dev_id, queue_id, num_to_process,
- burst_sz, &total_time, &min_time, &max_time, latency_flag);
+ op_params->ref_dec_op, ad->dev_id, queue_id,
+ num_to_process, burst_sz, &total_time,
+ &min_time, &max_time, latency_flag);
else if (op_type == RTE_BBDEV_OP_LDPC_ENC)
iter = latency_test_ldpc_enc(op_params->mp, bufs,
op_params->ref_enc_op, ad->dev_id, queue_id,
--
2.37.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-02 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-02 20:21 [PATCH v3 00/17] test/bbdev: changes for 23.03 Hernan Vargas
2023-03-02 20:21 ` [PATCH v3 01/17] test/bbdev: fix seg fault for non supported HARQ len Hernan Vargas
2023-03-06 13:17 ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-03-02 20:21 ` [PATCH v3 02/17] test/bbdev: extend HARQ tolerance Hernan Vargas
2023-03-02 20:21 ` [PATCH v3 03/17] test/bbdev: remove check for invalid opaque data Hernan Vargas
2023-03-02 20:21 ` [PATCH v3 04/17] test/bbdev: refactor TB throughput report Hernan Vargas
2023-03-02 20:21 ` [PATCH v3 05/17] test/bbdev: add timeout for latency tests Hernan Vargas
2023-03-02 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 06/17] test/bbdev: enable early termination for validation Hernan Vargas
2023-03-02 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 07/17] test/bbdev: report device status in test-bbdev Hernan Vargas
2023-03-02 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 08/17] test/bbdev: test start/stop bbdev API Hernan Vargas
2023-03-03 12:31 ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-03-02 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 09/17] test/bbdev: add timeout for enq/deq loops Hernan Vargas
2023-03-03 12:44 ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-03-02 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 10/17] test/bbdev: add support for BLER for 4G Hernan Vargas
2023-03-03 16:41 ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-03-02 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 11/17] test/bbdev: extend support for large TB Hernan Vargas
2023-03-02 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 12/17] test/bbdev: adjustment for soft output Hernan Vargas
2023-03-02 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 13/17] test/bbdev: expose warning counters Hernan Vargas
2023-03-02 20:22 ` Hernan Vargas [this message]
2023-03-02 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 15/17] test/bbdev: use mbuf reset function Hernan Vargas
2023-03-02 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 16/17] test/bbdev: remove max iteration from vectors Hernan Vargas
2023-03-02 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 17/17] test/bbdev: remove iter count from bler test Hernan Vargas
2023-03-06 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 00/17] test/bbdev: changes for 23.03 Maxime Coquelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230302202211.170017-15-hernan.vargas@intel.com \
--to=hernan.vargas@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).