DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, mkp@redhat.com, chenbo.xia@intel.com,
	david.marchand@redhat.com
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] vhost: fix madvise IOTLB entries pages overlap check
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 12:40:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230315114010.444005-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> (raw)

At removal time, when testing whether the IOTLB entry has
shared pages with the previous and next entries in the
cache, it checks whether the start address of the entry to
be removed is on the same page as the start address of the
next entry in the cache.

This is not correct, as an entry could cover several page
so the end address of the entry to be remove should be
used. This patch address this issue.

Fixes: dea092d0addb ("vhost: fix madvise arguments alignment")

Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
---
 lib/vhost/iotlb.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/vhost/iotlb.c b/lib/vhost/iotlb.c
index 11785392ac..3f45bc6061 100644
--- a/lib/vhost/iotlb.c
+++ b/lib/vhost/iotlb.c
@@ -182,8 +182,8 @@ vhost_user_iotlb_cache_random_evict(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtque
 					(node->uaddr & mask) != (prev_node->uaddr & mask)) {
 				next_node = RTE_TAILQ_NEXT(node, next);
 				/* Don't disable coredump if the next node is in the same page */
-				if (next_node == NULL ||
-						(node->uaddr & mask) != (next_node->uaddr & mask))
+				if (next_node == NULL || ((node->uaddr + node->size - 1) & mask) !=
+						(next_node->uaddr & mask))
 					mem_set_dump((void *)(uintptr_t)node->uaddr, node->size,
 							false, alignment);
 			}
@@ -287,8 +287,8 @@ vhost_user_iotlb_cache_remove(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq
 					(node->uaddr & mask) != (prev_node->uaddr & mask)) {
 				next_node = RTE_TAILQ_NEXT(node, next);
 				/* Don't disable coredump if the next node is in the same page */
-				if (next_node == NULL ||
-						(node->uaddr & mask) != (next_node->uaddr & mask))
+				if (next_node == NULL || ((node->uaddr + node->size - 1) & mask) !=
+						(next_node->uaddr & mask))
 					mem_set_dump((void *)(uintptr_t)node->uaddr, node->size,
 							false, alignment);
 			}
-- 
2.39.2


             reply	other threads:[~2023-03-15 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-15 11:40 Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2023-03-16  1:57 ` Xia, Chenbo
2023-03-16  8:13 ` David Marchand
2023-03-16  8:38   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-03-16  8:52     ` David Marchand
2023-03-16 14:45       ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-03-16 14:45 ` Maxime Coquelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230315114010.444005-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=chenbo.xia@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=mkp@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).