From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3019942C91; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 04:23:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EEDF410F1; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 04:23:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pg1-f179.google.com (mail-pg1-f179.google.com [209.85.215.179]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C1E40689 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 04:23:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pg1-f179.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-543cc9541feso1950597a12.2 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2023 19:23:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1686536584; x=1689128584; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=jGvs35wRSofKYlRKLIJnC0CJC4Y8nze4m0LxeC4Serk=; b=4lPYcM3y616HPou3uXkWPh8qntJPt9+zmOBWvgdL8VGOpTw5WH2XJXBNTofuAIUeur GBeyg7S2GQE4AmfQlzGVBU6UIrMo4NZHgcnVZEBx/tYsajO6Wm15DfndhecMTK5mCba0 +CyXEWkCdM/vWI8C66I4HJYPMsdcR1JgtZtqpsFM/VnmY8XdaM+bP9+U0/JZYrhZ4DVl +mN4YmDMeHtiAxe+0fejuLn3X0OpSx9Z0SFgKGFH1zWfcFQgi6KOhyXq2l6CTQm1rnef D749YYPSbUVy2zSV8N2L5f0tjafjoqK2vcCD1DCEc1HNFDHr6suuDLz+m9wau4Dc6uHT v1qA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686536584; x=1689128584; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jGvs35wRSofKYlRKLIJnC0CJC4Y8nze4m0LxeC4Serk=; b=IDMpQPiHB6bU7iVHqfpua7gpHTPQLI1cnszQ7oOA6LLgPMIVPXgajNFU8uXEPt7Byg HdJgOurXa3i4iIs2kEGM5amHEpU7ebUubREG2sGAPIq4q9WDUm3F4AduvnaPHHHBd6s5 tH+4RvTUZW9hYfWH42WYaHkbNR0m26jdTpcSyQy1gNMwHuj96X+y9NJRuJIyNrFsxH5a qDJYemKriOpYwczQm+XwxeEemiyV19Fctkc1Decli6UQvTgLJ33+meW1n6XwlTMz8pNq uYh03hit+LcYsM7/ryBGRWGjIUOlSRBhmsqofR7DGwUEhols6GjtyrX+QyWRCV7U3VMF xnaA== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwNBFePK/MorVdDwIjwlPvBh6mgECRIxFmpjKgyxXBIs273Kti0 Sg6H1q5dYctSnfKLssfccSKvDQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5XifnvcpkfzUaLH4maATA4nWfMXNr0gYtZ3+LgYFJxMe0bfS8Agb+kqr9SbcDnFiSfhOj7tQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:549f:b0:119:38a8:63d2 with SMTP id i31-20020a056a20549f00b0011938a863d2mr10188419pzk.1.1686536584018; Sun, 11 Jun 2023 19:23:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-120-218.wavecable.com. [204.195.120.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jm18-20020a17090304d200b001ac6b926621sm6894488plb.292.2023.06.11.19.23.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 11 Jun 2023 19:23:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2023 19:23:02 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Vivek Sharma Cc: dev@dpdk.org, cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] eal/bitmap: support reverse bitmap scan Message-ID: <20230611192302.508375be@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <1539071699-29963-1-git-send-email-vivek.sharma@caviumnetworks.com> References: <1539071699-29963-1-git-send-email-vivek.sharma@caviumnetworks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 13:24:57 +0530 Vivek Sharma wrote: > This patchset implements the support for reverse bitmap scanning along with > test support. Reverse scanning is quite useful when bit position signifies > an ordering according to some attribute, e.g., priority ordering. > > Prerequisite: > * Note that this patchset is dependent on patch:- > 'http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/45307/' > > Vivek Sharma (2): > eal/bitmap: support bitmap reverse scanning > test/bitmap: implement reverse bitmap scan test > > lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bitmap.h | 164 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > test/test/test_bitmap.c | 71 ++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 213 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > This patchset has had no feedback in 5 years. * There was never an application that needed it. * EAL directory structure changed. * It would cause an ABI breakage. If you have an example that needs it, then rebase and follow ABI rules and the next ABI change will be for 23.11