From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74FB42C91; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 04:27:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6659842D30; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 04:27:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pf1-f171.google.com (mail-pf1-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BDE42D29 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 04:27:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf1-f171.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-650352b89f6so2925240b3a.0 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2023 19:27:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1686536832; x=1689128832; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=qgxWmb7zCuOWq2z8liiiio9tIT0VjxsXimSdyV2+eLE=; b=lvqzebzz03WbzgZL8XJLLxkudwQky/h8USBF8Z9KpaoDKCOOna1vF73Yp7Dz5jP/tZ LHwB+uOPaUOIYcq6OnijhsVhM4ObNho8fPf9ApuJiqI4i0rnW3I0LrnH9daOUzRn0+fW cqRyqpo3Xzv95b4RIj0Asn487pYTuONT7BNMZt7GUEO/7kRNjA7evdeI9Ma6N3ubLrf2 NRZbYNqh71Psy4O4+UEIJOsM03pH6KeKAemvf1xgvqXBXDBg9YEs4y2h9gI3P9wYduPU GYRskN7HBmjbmpHKoEuk4SCDfi7MNBvrrVpJQDpAkVd3keSCKFy78let1yTRaFQEHcth 9N5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686536832; x=1689128832; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qgxWmb7zCuOWq2z8liiiio9tIT0VjxsXimSdyV2+eLE=; b=PjGA5HFMoQEWi3Wkk01ohxsVBE0Cz0aDgG9ZyczRzXLGZD8DxIMLPRW3M4Wa2ODeNb 5oMnFuHPkoytBqKWt6rj5B2hoay/Vg8wB1MDCnIDKE3EfBJF7ANM1KeYnOiNMeq8FIRK 7awD8RqPB1xCVDOE+50DB1wgwNaA5p7Vlte3lrtIpSmJ1RtQoksW29SLduCXt3ueIOyh fyht+IXA213JTB/UqsidZ5H9YO/MBoKMyqajQcPhqZF5t8G6M1lIDUEG/jkgGx7WqTOx QXfdAMfknw99aOO//p8eDwpoo/Jp1Ts3Iu4NL4tXbuD7LKfD5XavGibOOkhNFxCbQZXP fz/w== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyrmiqU9W40WFfrqUWMn0un09NV+F3QQwWGs8ypWVCkIgKr14iV r8iGD5i5gA+8TW0rUoPcG1LCLg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4hMSMU+Uqmny0ix46NCeK50Z3hKXrE4OifBx1N7wZGA2fI+kRxO2FpXAhNtjvEskjSaCloWg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:980d:b0:10b:cc13:5ac8 with SMTP id ue13-20020a056a21980d00b0010bcc135ac8mr6578598pzb.27.1686536832658; Sun, 11 Jun 2023 19:27:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-120-218.wavecable.com. [204.195.120.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a192-20020a6390c9000000b0051b4a163ccdsm6332824pge.11.2023.06.11.19.27.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 11 Jun 2023 19:27:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2023 19:27:10 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" Cc: Cody Doucette , "Dumitrescu, Cristian" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Fu, Qiaobin" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] ip_frag: extend IPv6 fragment header retrieval Message-ID: <20230611192710.5cf09fb0@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772580103069E6F@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20181031021758.66752-1-doucette@bu.edu> <20181031021758.66752-4-doucette@bu.edu> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772580103067027@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772580103069E6F@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 23:00:19 +0000 "Ananyev, Konstantin" wrote: > >Thanks for reviewing -- I see your point about this patch only removing one of the places where the code makes assumptions about the position of the fragmentation header. > > >Unfortunately at the moment I don't have the resources to dedicate to writing the complete solution and doing a performance check, so I think I should withdraw the patch. > > Ok, NP that's understandable. > Again I provided my comments quite late. Marking this patchset as closed with changes requested. If someone wants to revive it they can rebase and resubmit.