From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] doc: announce new mbuf field for LRO
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 09:38:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230612093817.3a69b468@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1565103383-23864-2-git-send-email-matan@mellanox.com>
On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 14:56:23 +0000
Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com> wrote:
> The API breakage is because the ``tso_segsz`` field was documented for
> LRO.
>
> The ``tso_segsz`` field in mbuf indicates the size of each segment in
> the LRO packet in Rx path and should be provided by the LRO packet
> port.
>
> While the generic LRO packet may aggregate different segments sizes in
> one packet, it is impossible to expose this information for each segment
> by one field and it doesn't make sense to expose all the segments sizes
> in the mbuf.
>
> A new field may be added as union with the above field to expose the
> number of segments aggregated in the LRO packet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>
I assume LRO worked out how to use dynamic field for this.
And the rest of this patchset is no longer relevant.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-12 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-06 14:56 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] doc: announce ethdev ABI change for LRO fields Matan Azrad
2019-08-06 14:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] doc: announce new mbuf field for LRO Matan Azrad
2019-08-06 15:58 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-08-06 18:50 ` Matan Azrad
2019-08-07 10:17 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-08-07 12:35 ` Matan Azrad
2019-08-07 14:18 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-08-08 10:16 ` Matan Azrad
2019-08-08 10:48 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-08-08 11:16 ` Matan Azrad
2019-08-08 16:26 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-08-06 18:17 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-08-10 21:31 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-24 23:41 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-06-02 6:49 ` Matan Azrad
2020-07-27 8:00 ` Olivier Matz
2020-07-27 8:41 ` Matan Azrad
2020-07-27 9:07 ` Olivier Matz
2023-06-12 16:38 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2019-08-06 15:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] doc: announce ethdev ABI change for LRO fields Andrew Rybchenko
2019-08-10 21:40 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230612093817.3a69b468@hermes.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=matan@mellanox.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).