From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, bluca@debian.org, david.marchand@redhat.com,
ian.stokes@intel.com, Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>,
Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>,
David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] build/pkg-config: remove machine arch flag
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 12:33:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230614123310.710fa9e0@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201211155111.145279-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com>
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:51:11 +0000
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
> Traditionally any apps built using DPDK had to support the same
> instruction sets as supported when the DPDK SDK itself was built, since
> that was "leaked" through to the end-app and DPDK headers via
> RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_* values. Therefore, when converting over to meson
> for app build correctness the "-march=" flag was included in the
> pkg-config cflags output.
>
> However, since the DPDK-specific CPU flags are now obsolete, and we
> instead check directly for compiler-defined flags, we should no longer
> need to force the exact same architecture match in all cases. To
> faciliate such flexibility, a new pkg_config_machine_args array - which
> defaults to the existing machine_args array has been defined. The
> individual architectures - x86, arm and ppc - can choose if and how to
> override this value themselves.
>
> For x86, since SSE4.2 is the minimum instruction-set level needed to run
> DPDK, and since some header files assume that minimum level of
> instruction set support, we override the "-march=" value with "-msse4"
> for the pkg-config file. This allows end applications to set their own
> "march" value while still ensuring valid DPDK compilation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
This looks fine, and can see no negatives in the comments.
Could you rebase and resubmit a new version if still relevant?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-14 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-11 15:51 Bruce Richardson
2020-12-16 18:45 ` David Christensen
2021-09-15 16:28 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-09-15 21:23 ` David Christensen
2021-09-16 3:43 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-09-16 10:16 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-09-16 14:11 ` Ruifeng Wang
2023-06-14 19:33 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2023-06-15 8:44 ` Bruce Richardson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230614123310.710fa9e0@hermes.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=bluca@debian.org \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
--cc=ian.stokes@intel.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).