From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA10E42DE1; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 04:03:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3257640144; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 04:03:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pl1-f175.google.com (mail-pl1-f175.google.com [209.85.214.175]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD040400D5 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 04:03:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pl1-f175.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1b8ad8383faso635445ad.0 for ; Wed, 05 Jul 2023 19:03:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1688609000; x=1691201000; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Eft2WLnIq/Sl3NffpBZuKXPAUhFCmq+9BZ65hz15L9c=; b=tdC3p351ZZF5xwZWMMHH4PNsd7EJ8lzDItPHluS833a7QGHMwxA2e5YDZPPnd+S2ee PNB6qf1Fr6hl6tAhiDACW42iAtm1SgHayo8oaacpoFAZoZba9wdXOCdMrd614P0Lnete j3FP78QUjbKs3u8G3kO8xfONT6fJokCp2Z8xXlJoUIBnmPqRaNcV8CMbk/VvCmj8pXf/ awWH6p2LQ9Wriv6vY3N/qZ8QFw3M6EfGNiZfHVeeusyj887KR1g4zW2Q+4W4B8Pbhp7W aU0JH3XMIsLm6XSygQR/RRNqq+4n/syVUB5YtIS5WtcuMdTVVb5yxss1DfxNNVl280z7 +d5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1688609000; x=1691201000; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Eft2WLnIq/Sl3NffpBZuKXPAUhFCmq+9BZ65hz15L9c=; b=aAhyUqqPhq84ProJBnFs1EKml1LZMYLzE/xOfVDiSAt6Pl0TqBPELTH7zcqDEbnvX9 8sClZnVbs9WfofA2c/1TZqMbpbeIXWBQUmULJmLFfuiWzjSG0oWfwiFroGTMfxKad/M9 mkStRPoQuB6V27Ppb80eEXNbmIt3SVnd74sWlU28BILDrk7gcxJ+B+w/Wqra4s8Colqu 2+MC8Oh5EE3B9OySTbiRolA07L37FDJsck1UkTJIOldbVzHt3QihuaX9f3kMMJFa65PV mnkDCywi2sti9FccMNZtlrtd1P3JaQeN7zV8tHU+ziHcbbcNH7Oy8k2e52YpwMSqfyOX AOrg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLbY2z/qTqoYOsw5EFfctWOx6Tqtd/n7K7nxGyNHe7t6hd3Bcfs1 hgud/AWRTPSUdJR9h/Palb8fhA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlH+g2QuM1LRAd7q0MZ3ufj+69MixlkSR0wzbG7TlRJOhxFtmG5AqkV2CGTGnO/MDf4OmHpmlQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2685:b0:1b8:76fc:5bf6 with SMTP id jf5-20020a170903268500b001b876fc5bf6mr637731plb.43.1688608999786; Wed, 05 Jul 2023 19:03:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-120-218.wavecable.com. [204.195.120.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y15-20020a17090264cf00b001b7f71ec608sm136398pli.155.2023.07.05.19.03.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 05 Jul 2023 19:03:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 19:03:17 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] mailmap: fix sorting Message-ID: <20230705190317.0a20ff1e@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <00be850c-9583-ec9e-6aad-39515cf4dff1@amd.com> References: <20230705234535.289950-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <00be850c-9583-ec9e-6aad-39515cf4dff1@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 01:58:03 +0100 Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 7/6/2023 12:45 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > The mailmap file is supposed to be in sorted order, > > but several entries are in the wrong place. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger > > > > Hi Stephen, > > What are you using for sorting? Emacs has a sort-lines function. > When I use 'sort' binary [1] I get only a few lines of diff, > but if I use vim ":sort" command I get a diff similar to this patch with > lots of change. > > It looks like these two variant of 'sort' works differently. > > At least vim ":sort l" gives same output with 'sort' binary, and vim > language config I have is "en_US.UTF-8", I assume 'sort' binary output > is based on this language setting. > > Will it work to stick with 'sort' binary and fix a few lines of diff in > current file? Sure, lets just use sort with utf-8