From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B04A542E30; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 16:41:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358AD40698; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 16:41:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pf1-f182.google.com (mail-pf1-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 331C040150 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 16:41:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf1-f182.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6682909acadso2322950b3a.3 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 07:41:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1689000088; x=1691592088; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=xfAbXRyzK4PcaCMZ9X3shNUz+FSuuTh62ZLDAf0vli4=; b=bco54QnKOBCVhjv+fWBCm4q+21j16Fk1w1UKtfZ56PeYcI0xue9hnqN/xz28CcT4Tx UfXakdIYxJ27kF3RrfIaH8Vx9G2LtFuy2rx988brE2Yf5O3w+UCrmTY5yGNcWcZzPlm/ KzR+lCVLSvmkWv1RZ5ATqqp+Lbdz7/pQCIwOZnlCCfcf8PuRq1yAXX/rSbEMBJCYG92j rdH3OtDi2GkjfO2nXJXmcJ+5oYG7Dj21eJHSHqQK2xz576MbJFF64H8jsOtVEPDO7/Zc ivc8WulTMJqJ2jWhxh2pUb+VlFXftYNg+M8cS26lCsBnByTXv4jKTMC7Mt8pOCBuyqMb KAVg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1689000088; x=1691592088; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xfAbXRyzK4PcaCMZ9X3shNUz+FSuuTh62ZLDAf0vli4=; b=TI1KAdP75hw8gVerqCA3zyXgfPa8CpQBlUk17gPj6jtdPj36813QJSoop+DuvXKQpQ fryJB1mKa0a5Fl0flmf/AYC9XM9A4Y7rvKsG7zV6GWSnhYxSkuNXI2peSklTn3t/n91t GLRBmrImqNiewm4ANxLI8WtgI56UiJaPmYpq9S2rqvfXGzL76h7l2v+5T3BVbKl38qZO m9IlYFJaGiz2NuTAoqEiivhtUbM1YOsnpS+KJ59hELsGum5a1SGp5rP4amnDCZzKMMy5 km5KrnMYD8H3yMC9uCIzjb9xyi26gr0ob8zZCeNMa+mNedeAe0doc1XUMaBoPDNuyF6R EJTw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLYm0+PQXsZXyFVB8liH1wMmIyoj9xJzsyGB1aXbrimU85xYWxPZ 0cFxd250Kb3G8XBWL35Wm/K1sA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlFwGDu0FkfPyXrekXKrUGUnUK5d/Cb3QrvYyW9ZJjrk2vkLQmmW5NK5V6XiOQWftJxSEK22wQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2e9f:b0:668:8596:752f with SMTP id fd31-20020a056a002e9f00b006688596752fmr13182258pfb.4.1689000088032; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 07:41:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-120-218.wavecable.com. [204.195.120.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ff3-20020a056a002f4300b0064fde7ae1ffsm7251645pfb.38.2023.07.10.07.41.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 10 Jul 2023 07:41:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 07:41:26 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: Rongwei Liu , Ori Kam , "NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL)" , Andrew Rybchenko , "dev@dpdk.org" , Matan Azrad , Slava Ovsiienko , Suanming Mou Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] add IPv6 extension push remove Message-ID: <20230710074126.41773a66@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <97d580a1-cad9-6b6b-c010-cff0101d5fcb@amd.com> References: <20230524073929.400623-1-rongweil@nvidia.com> <97d580a1-cad9-6b6b-c010-cff0101d5fcb@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 09:55:59 +0100 Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 7/10/2023 3:32 AM, Rongwei Liu wrote: > > Hi Ferruh & Andrew & Ori & Thomas: > > Sorry, we can't commit the PMD implementation for "IPv6 extension push remove" feature in time for this release. > > There are some dis-agreements which need to be addressed internally. > > We will continue to work on this and plan to push it in the next release. > > > > RFC link: https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/cover/20230417022630.2377505-1-rongweil@nvidia.com/ > > V1 patch with full PMD implementation: https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/cover/20230417092540.2617450-1-rongweil@nvidia.com/ > > > > Hi Rongwei, > > Thanks for the heads up. > As long as there is a plan to upstream driver implementation, I think it > is OK to keep ethdev change and wait for driver implementation for > better design instead of rushing it for this release with lower quality > (although target should be to have driver changes with same release with > API changes for future features). Please wait the change until driver is ready. Don't want to deal with API/ABI changes when driver is upstream. Also, no unused code please.