From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C3042E9E; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 18:50:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1181A40A80; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 18:50:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pf1-f179.google.com (mail-pf1-f179.google.com [209.85.210.179]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 175DD4068E for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 18:50:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf1-f179.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-666ecf9a0ceso3140382b3a.2 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 09:50:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1689612648; x=1692204648; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=1j3W229QzsnNvRiblVWYiRrHDXX9mFPotRSezdlB4R4=; b=surZe2FgMBwVvHL5W9Hsb3KMePsa/j/kYG+CwdmA9rnZCGb0IsWtgpRbCOxUny8LCQ 0o3l6Y9IdWKcvqk17zM+21qJpfXjMwp4Wfqr9HQnsb6OXq1TaosbL4kJm6OkoGwtNHwe uWvhpjJyKNAXaXAGI8yD69lCGdC+3Ik8FLKke/rgLTWPRdhf82CaFy8Rpw8PNLjD+GD7 Yt/8wF/BddmU9EXp6VwMTfgPGyrTIgWX3gIFGjNTcobsk9GzLs3kYHLhYpz6HpxZI7lI ANCAIWCooSMOT4O/mURF8asChlb2n2Bw1zGa07MBIbY8VoOtkn1a6pXxs3gXg0c6WN1u 8wyA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1689612648; x=1692204648; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1j3W229QzsnNvRiblVWYiRrHDXX9mFPotRSezdlB4R4=; b=WKhDkYnB9/J7rcs5YiNbMKsxso6HyeRexL/v5HvZiCPMdpTIAe9dy1XBPotWIaWk1z hTQlVfTZmn618TKYckTCELxPFMnlSdhlincfJpp4p+hHFXbj7gifYYpxDNshCfUoGa1M 87RbB5+sBUlgv2XQXQLogOgpENUr+kUhZaZz4gd1Y+89/j+mJe7ZPWxyxUVVMkahqbij q/wrEizJ8KwI5SmeFz3BN3ypGNY7kEFu1XPzMZzQ0rhVxu9G5c/FZcP835SUW5PILFWL tthlWpI0Nm0g3NvMfQQoXC9YA+8KbLTC3hpsm8K+vBnhS1IZbifctEsRGKmQTPUO9HwQ n2hg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLaAsQdJ3IddtlkicxQDCApZ1aT/ooOwuYi90ffbfMmaDuNdbwDm 97I0tIB0mGwM7ZO0N2PGCvf1wg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlErjCSGj1hW401GVmKoVFHGr91Z2A46SfzGkvz6NUxpPuEZlVSUiMV0uCf4+EuTPEj/vqPBmw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:179b:b0:66e:4df5:6c10 with SMTP id s27-20020a056a00179b00b0066e4df56c10mr15825459pfg.34.1689612648167; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 09:50:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-127-207.wavecable.com. [204.195.127.207]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e18-20020a637452000000b0055c02b8688asm51479pgn.20.2023.07.17.09.50.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 17 Jul 2023 09:50:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 09:50:46 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Ruifeng Wang Cc: Supriya Shekhar Mane , "thomas@monjalon.net" , Chandrakant Sharpa , "dev@dpdk.org" , Zaheer R M , Gurusidhesh G H , "david.marchand@redhat.com" , "bruce.richardson@intel.com" , Jan Viktorin , "jerinj@marvell.com" , Honnappa Nagarahalli , nd Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Add Armv7 support Message-ID: <20230717095046.22151b0a@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: References: <20210610111839.7481-1-s.chandrakant@globaledgesoft.com> <2086868.Y7UdBn2X1H@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 06:58:15 +0000 Ruifeng Wang wrote: > > > > Do you have any plan on CI? > > I don't think DPDK Lab has Armv7 hardware to run tests. > Yes, we do have plans for CI for armv7, We are currently conducting > our testing with WPJ419 platform. I would like to note what all things > that should be taken into consideration for making CI support for armv7 > related contributions. > [Ruifeng] I think basically we should have build for armv7. And in-tree unit tests are also preferred to run. > For traffic/performance tests, it is good to have. > > Aso, we would like know how the testing for armv7 was done in older > DPDK releases, and what all things were considered, so that we can follow > the same. > [Ruifeng] As I know, there was no public CI for armv7 in older releases. > > Regards, > Supriya Mane This patch is over 2 years old. Has there been any progress on it? Does it still make sense? What is missing?