From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9094E4301A; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 19:50:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B82040DDB; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 19:50:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD169400D6 for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 19:50:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1086) id DDE3420FC4C4; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 10:50:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com DDE3420FC4C4 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1691603456; bh=/IQrBodQXb0sEZR5AQpBHYq+YCmPYjxWS2gq3b0eiL0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Dv6PR7pIHCGS2G4Dsu906YnbJDybpcn/3JIG0hlMmMrPQG7oXx4eWD/WnSEOl70UH yQ5E86pMDTz7IlrfCDfWdL8Pu3mq+I22H+d5fmiKTG/VmSsauRaFY3vl2ZF46VFWFY rjRxsW2t+Hokgfcoo/K1dvzFQFkV7X3E1k3pcjpM= Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 10:50:56 -0700 From: Tyler Retzlaff To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ruifeng Wang , Bruce Richardson , Konstantin Ananyev Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] eal: mark rte_atomic128_cmp_exchange as stable Message-ID: <20230809175056.GB22800@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> References: <20230809164312.308093-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20230809164312.308093-12-stephen@networkplumber.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230809164312.308093-12-stephen@networkplumber.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 09:43:03AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > This has been around since 2021. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger > --- > lib/eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h | 1 - > lib/eal/include/generic/rte_atomic.h | 1 - > lib/eal/x86/include/rte_atomic_64.h | 1 - > 3 files changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h b/lib/eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h > index 604791150765..5005a6dfed76 100644 > --- a/lib/eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h > +++ b/lib/eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h > @@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ __ATOMIC128_CAS_OP(__cas_128_acq_rel, "caspal") > > #endif > > -__rte_experimental > static inline int > rte_atomic128_cmp_exchange(rte_int128_t *dst, rte_int128_t *exp, > const rte_int128_t *src, unsigned int weak, int success, > diff --git a/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_atomic.h b/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_atomic.h > index aef44e245548..1a9323dc8ad8 100644 > --- a/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_atomic.h > +++ b/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_atomic.h > @@ -1121,7 +1121,6 @@ typedef struct { > * @return > * Non-zero on success; 0 on failure. > */ > -__rte_experimental > static inline int > rte_atomic128_cmp_exchange(rte_int128_t *dst, > rte_int128_t *exp, > diff --git a/lib/eal/x86/include/rte_atomic_64.h b/lib/eal/x86/include/rte_atomic_64.h > index 0edee8627224..e968bbf0ce65 100644 > --- a/lib/eal/x86/include/rte_atomic_64.h > +++ b/lib/eal/x86/include/rte_atomic_64.h > @@ -182,7 +182,6 @@ static inline void rte_atomic64_clear(rte_atomic64_t *v) > > /*------------------------ 128 bit atomic operations -------------------------*/ > > -__rte_experimental > static inline int > rte_atomic128_cmp_exchange(rte_int128_t *dst, > rte_int128_t *exp, I'm wondering if given the fluidity of changes in atomics right now we should hold this for a little while / close to the end of the merge window just in case we want to adjust it? > -- > 2.39.2