From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A9443043; Sat, 12 Aug 2023 17:00:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279FC410DC; Sat, 12 Aug 2023 17:00:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pg1-f180.google.com (mail-pg1-f180.google.com [209.85.215.180]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A3740151 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2023 17:00:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pg1-f180.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-5656a5c6721so1230672a12.1 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2023 08:00:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1691852428; x=1692457228; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=BCLlGUehZ8dPy4GdfF7PR8WX38nWsaWUBEqFEhZzw4A=; b=meK0pw5hJXS/lmVZpT8PR6nG5nvI96GqexvYgd6/ElwU4uvEDLRsB+Or8QpBvwFayB GDKiOVAiulGJ/FsckFHJeseLrZndnBh4YX+8xyeg/0b9p33r63ofBMNTCAIJMLqgOeIk dwQGsFCP34oNIYECb63xO+tFXtQVGq+gn9AKNFwuV0eUEc2SX5K5tsNK0WrpXUUZxgcA M/hNmPTxiwWq8WZHX9svO7OV6S8wPBkrIg1QcrCdhWSL1VhqG3S9YRBWYhB9xk4RCTTk MK2FVgqWvNFshRxu2r0gdzBQc2cX8uq6etfUiImFITwEwruIhuQvF06FJzoGm1IY2jzD L8fA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691852428; x=1692457228; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BCLlGUehZ8dPy4GdfF7PR8WX38nWsaWUBEqFEhZzw4A=; b=SPorAfFHAuya3Q9/NwXsmZzAZ8jNYp553yXBJbE49NDDw+PtDImLvhwsy1uCZJjzHN 6v0liwl2WJY6WO81qQfWWbH0tMwbh8vyXQCMVIVe0d87t/+hETGRbl0s4Xt1Wssvkxu3 MBkLHAF/SiCQ2Nl1oY7GT3tze5103Yzd68Y7Ksx4MuxIE14nMLzv1STf/etdgkraw5Jq E7IIho/Vs2xVIURQx1IVUvNHEkp2TF62vGF/+hTDqWh55JdOzaFrXYKYXGeBMys3sn8g HLSVU+f8mpEqSQJEQ4xDkWrJ0rIwQeQsrPUcvAvLV09vQ3GbDHR/dmqWty+FVv7yRddy gAYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwsQ8N7RC+bUfEGm/AWY/LSRdF1d+AdPlFqbMoQX/kaUVaBBmZb frwcTNk+Ul2lhc6ty2Zld1lSeg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEDe0wCuQoet2zJFikB/DAhIxumlUj52FFcSDRG1Tr557XevU9pUSUphP0tclUSyBJLXr2tTQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:6a8a:b0:263:68b0:8ca5 with SMTP id u10-20020a17090a6a8a00b0026368b08ca5mr2871542pjj.43.1691852428186; Sat, 12 Aug 2023 08:00:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-127-207.wavecable.com. [204.195.127.207]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c4-20020a17090ab28400b00256a4d59bfasm6843693pjr.23.2023.08.12.08.00.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 12 Aug 2023 08:00:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2023 08:00:25 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Vipin Varghese Cc: , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] usertools: suggest use of hwloc for new cpu Message-ID: <20230812080025.7626a94d@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <20230812005720.997-1-vipin.varghese@amd.com> References: <20230812005720.997-1-vipin.varghese@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Sat, 12 Aug 2023 06:27:20 +0530 Vipin Varghese wrote: > Most modern processor now supports numa by partitioning > NUMA based on CPU-IO & Last Level Cache within the same socket. > As per the discussion in mailing list, suggesting the make > use of hw-loc for such scenarios. > > Signed-off-by: Vipin Varghese NAK, no scripting hwloc, it is ugly and creates a dependency that is not listed in DPDK packaging. It would be better to just add a footnote now something like cpu_layout script is deprecated use hwloc instead. And include full deprecation notice in DPDK documentation. Maybe there is a standard python way to mark whole script as deprecated.