DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] test: remove some strings from cmdline_etheraddr tests
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 10:18:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231003101804.34f1d73f@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e217b1a6-58b2-4737-935f-7ca0d177a6df@amd.com>

On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 17:50:13 +0100
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com> wrote:

> On 10/3/2023 5:36 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 11:47:51 +0100
> > Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com> wrote:
> >   
> >> On 10/2/2023 7:37 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:  
> >>> Some of the ethernet address formats which were invalid will
> >>> now become valid inputs when rte_ether_unformat_addr is modified
> >>> to allow leading zeros.
> >>>
> >>> Also, make local variables static.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> >>>     
> >>
> >> <...>
> >>  
> >>> @@ -61,10 +60,8 @@ const char * ether_addr_invalid_strs[] = {
> >>>  		"INVA:LIDC:HARS",
> >>>  		/* misc */
> >>>  		"01 23 45 67 89 AB",
> >>> -		"01.23.45.67.89.AB",
> >>>  		"01,23,45,67,89,AB",
> >>> -		"01:23:45\0:67:89:AB",
> >>> -		"01:23:45#:67:89:AB",
> >>>    
> >>
> >> Why these two are valid now?
> >>
> >> And I guess second one is still not valid, but first one is parsed as
> >> [1], is this expected?
> >>
> >> [1] 00:01:00:23:00:45  
> > 
> > The code in cmdline converts the comment character # to a null byte.
> > So both test are the same.
> > 
> > With new unformat, it allows a 3 part mac address with leading
> > zeros.
> > 	01:23:45 is equivalent to 0001:0023:0045
> >  
> 
> With 3 part MAC, omitting leading zeros looks confusing to me, because
> that omitted part becomes an octet in MAC. Like:
> 01:23:45 being equivalent to 00:01:00:23:00:45
> 
> As 3 part MAC, and 6 part MAC has separate functions, does it makes
> sense to require leading zeros in the 3 part MAC, what do you think?
> 

Right, 3 part MAC is only a legacy Cisco format, not used anywhere else.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-03 17:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-29 16:36 [RFC] rte_ether_unformat: accept more inputs Stephen Hemminger
2023-09-29 19:35 ` Morten Brørup
2023-09-29 23:08   ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-10-02 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] rte_ether_unformat_addr changes Stephen Hemminger
2023-10-02 18:37   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] test: remove some strings from cmdline_etheraddr tests Stephen Hemminger
2023-10-03 10:47     ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-10-03 10:59       ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-10-03 16:38         ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-10-03 16:36       ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-10-03 16:50         ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-10-03 17:18           ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2023-10-02 18:37   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] rte_ether_unformat: accept more inputs Stephen Hemminger
2023-10-02 18:37   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] test: add tests for rte_ether routines Stephen Hemminger
2023-10-03  6:17   ` [PATCH v2 0/3] rte_ether_unformat_addr changes Morten Brørup
2023-10-03 10:44   ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-10-03 16:27     ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-10-03 16:34     ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-10-03 20:29 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] rte_ether_unformat_addr related changes Stephen Hemminger
2023-10-03 20:29   ` [PATCH v3 1/4] test: remove some strings from cmdline_etheraddr tests Stephen Hemminger
2023-10-03 20:29   ` [PATCH v3 2/4] rte_ether_unformat: accept more inputs Stephen Hemminger
2023-10-03 20:29   ` [PATCH v3 3/4] test: add tests for rte_ether routines Stephen Hemminger
2023-10-03 20:29   ` [PATCH v3 4/4] net/tap: use rte_ether_unformat_address Stephen Hemminger
2023-10-11 14:25     ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-10-04 11:48   ` [PATCH v3 0/4] rte_ether_unformat_addr related changes Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231003101804.34f1d73f@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).