From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1939426B7; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 19:13:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30565402B3; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 19:13:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pl1-f169.google.com (mail-pl1-f169.google.com [209.85.214.169]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64BDF402A9 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 19:13:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pl1-f169.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1c5cd27b1acso18204905ad.2 for ; Wed, 04 Oct 2023 10:13:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1696439607; x=1697044407; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=fI+HH3RwWyseKtwkjVLbeOOt7WrorTj2ACk0wCb+6v4=; b=X246iG8OAZQ7130pEsOV11m/S9LFzY08LD2IeXTU/W1iX6mRQaRqHgxT39VTtPujI1 pZG0r/x6PHN18bLcQt06ATwd/O/IPSXpRn/+2B/hJ6FNEyyOzDBHlCsBTQ4QALpZwlAF dpCboGva/Gmg/riNx4UsRC2y5RWB5GcuOUYJiaquOKJWtWEht+lkyQA9rM1L3Tlm932o qf3Qw7tQlOrNDGe3oOrVWy76uFyl3VdX4arKd3I4fGlJgXcJ9WvdrRBKE/b8vGE6XRcH an2kgK0nQ5dao0yOvsGujP5XwLOOR7GZJbEot6wXzCDP8amhRcdtEk/1yCGiqdg68oPh JdRg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1696439607; x=1697044407; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fI+HH3RwWyseKtwkjVLbeOOt7WrorTj2ACk0wCb+6v4=; b=NyiOdhfny9x3P6Yoo91/PXjg2Fk39m1l2cydnbsoOAQGWXyZ9IOjSXCZBfSMPunLwb 2d2avP4SRZjkZLO/J4oBAFiZWdy8G54WfBYlwXYBFwvpTo8fIpAgkWiLChVhk+8TgujC Q5T96lZpUgnlm3Kd83l60XCcBVINTVvCPVnmoP/lQH5xBuYSdBFwAu/75eEJpZ1v/crh HhZ03+/mDczpLYI3ir6UDudsHd+ln8pEx3jhwLo8PoLdLR9UMAtaxxiucQ4F187XfqP0 koXneaTMBwzM2BcA3lI2F1eHikudXjH8odTIivmdxSzli7ReNL5XWueEigFZdN4GPf6z 7x/A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzSmuGuhvvMek6bCOXc5vNXC1mciAu6o9ZujTFx09vF1tGzB9XK +oUpheXadpLjAdPHgl1grdlbUQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGtf1+1HEfjIH82lmzndxqgt6uxBCbqyw4v9MStSsiIBpaACbApgeHkG4apV7ocHMXvemfA3w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ecc2:b0:1c6:1861:70a with SMTP id a2-20020a170902ecc200b001c61861070amr3332760plh.23.1696439607293; Wed, 04 Oct 2023 10:13:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-126-68.wavecable.com. [204.195.126.68]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u6-20020a170902e80600b001c55e13bf39sm3959142plg.275.2023.10.04.10.13.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 04 Oct 2023 10:13:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 10:13:25 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: David Marchand Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Reshma Pattan , Quentin Armitage Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] pcapng: move timestamp calculation into pdump Message-ID: <20231004101325.5a7eefbe@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: References: <20230921042349.104150-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20230921042349.104150-5-stephen@networkplumber.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Mon, 2 Oct 2023 10:15:25 +0200 David Marchand wrote: > > > > Bugzilla ID: 1291 ? > > This patch (and patch 3) updates some pcapng API, is it worth a RN update? > > > Fixes: c882eb544842 ("pcapng: fix timestamp wrapping in output files") > > Is it worth backporting? > I would say no, as some API update was needed to fix the issue. > But on the other hand, this is an experimental API, so I prefer to ask. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger Good question. Is experimental API allowed to change in a stable release?