From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D4343238;
	Sun, 29 Oct 2023 16:43:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447C640269;
	Sun, 29 Oct 2023 16:43:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-pl1-f178.google.com (mail-pl1-f178.google.com
 [209.85.214.178])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3A2400D5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun, 29 Oct 2023 16:43:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pl1-f178.google.com with SMTP id
 d9443c01a7336-1c434c33ec0so26836985ad.3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun, 29 Oct 2023 08:43:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1698594229;
 x=1699199029; darn=dpdk.org; 
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
 :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date
 :message-id:reply-to;
 bh=Tw5wWMzRPVoOjKhbzl4WRb0TxfwE6sBeSP1CRTdOOdQ=;
 b=3Rmaf0ltvUdS1Qmzigd1apoZB3rCu76JIhEsZrhjV+v7LwAq84rAkcmRe86iJGWuh8
 HGyg6vE+U+480cfckE1drCIf1xBGFTAzWLmNHRSivkokhCYMvNadY0RBGROUtt4DdOiP
 pP37aXmJvObr+k4liACF/BVi+pBEBIz8oHsvAXIro2dY7ULvombQyF9QP1Ehnk/MzYTp
 y4e0KftAaNV8TH+kZeTx4M8AbunI6Q7DR7qaSvm4+4CIvkaZ1iFiFK8pmFVUaEHTHgo6
 0UQ5iWOgLTOPfRpjOdZ8dyoeDCLZl/sbTkk1701pynoDz8uKHkJvgJCu6ZkyrGOH6U5Y
 zwCQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698594229; x=1699199029;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
 :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
 :subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=Tw5wWMzRPVoOjKhbzl4WRb0TxfwE6sBeSP1CRTdOOdQ=;
 b=Ob+VROoB02A/pJzdvKKYreq3xJ30aPSZxh+KVbeFpsFsBUfy+DJhvxQDrOlnJkddG2
 QnGREvcLsBNuJS5BpFnWZ08T7JkliLIIWHTtDN/fmj+3pBHkDwHwGFN/fM3ID/hXhDrJ
 lhiuNnh2+vbCCoE2eglvOA9J/pgop04YCXuPvDgP8JANvHBKE9JUUDXCNh17U6yhfdRz
 8wLnlfYtwiZbGYN1LNxWND2WYhYNLksNcIDrUyK/WO89uWvLrZd3lqn6IDGezwdsK1BB
 7bhTZE4DVecfxAmG1g7bpAdCla2tBGFv36ug6b3qGH5I3/8Nqkj1ZkQIGFwDS6LDJ1YP
 8ScQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw9JR1LfrwyCQUvqTqu1LNwynwS9bNo3fkwSHXTkY59ACGG91hW
 uohD0LzkSRXbyeikDXoek02E9A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH72/MlNn/NDCI7LcXnZKRodQXtMo16cIAovgzyipQgUWMe5TjQI8BO4AgErr1AV9Pp5z+gDw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:160b:b0:159:c24f:5fa4 with SMTP id
 l11-20020a056a20160b00b00159c24f5fa4mr7605427pzj.1.1698594229118; 
 Sun, 29 Oct 2023 08:43:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.local (204-195-123-141.wavecable.com. [204.195.123.141])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 jo8-20020a170903054800b001bd28b9c3ddsm4686253plb.299.2023.10.29.08.43.48
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Sun, 29 Oct 2023 08:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2023 08:43:47 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <thomas@monjalon.net>, <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
 <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>, <liuyonglong@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] ethdev: introduce maximum Rx buffer size
Message-ID: <20231029084347.56b202a4@hermes.local>
In-Reply-To: <20231028014847.27149-2-lihuisong@huawei.com>
References: <20230808040234.12947-1-lihuisong@huawei.com>
 <20231028014847.27149-1-lihuisong@huawei.com>
 <20231028014847.27149-2-lihuisong@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org

On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 09:48:45 +0800
Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com> wrote:

> +				"Ethdev port_id=%u, the data size application used in each mbuf is just %u instead of the whole data room(%u)

The message should be shortened.