From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B22432E6; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 16:44:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE14F40A79; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 16:44:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pl1-f182.google.com (mail-pl1-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B08A40A72 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 16:44:52 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pl1-f182.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1cc330e8f58so8419605ad.3 for ; Thu, 09 Nov 2023 07:44:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1699544692; x=1700149492; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=pnHdvuWBXrrOQYt7bIZQvEph9S8H0z2L9tL4/k4YwQY=; b=eE85TiJ3wiA1EtyT7PdgrkGXjzJaIC0l9jNKpz31X6wTJlQrhf3u1FlWOGpCuZPyf/ eU4B57PHfBa6VTkhioS/Qkh+mVeRNDI4FXiz8N8DwXwlf76IlpJ0u6U7VMHz/9xXmrym 653rPXDsGlF9YybNUSdJrOcJvWsH0QhxZ6DoWgOTiysHAG674C87XLnRc/0lrZbwtyMe +kFVeZzEoHL198UJunurh0G7KPSp64pT/n12LxCDbXea7rPSBZltfwXauD5pe3rSsi75 5JmrfM2nmHgd56daBh6TNoQahpYP9TyjzCpO3NK3OH6zDGVtLyIpo6rK9oplwgmGJXFk Sedw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1699544692; x=1700149492; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=pnHdvuWBXrrOQYt7bIZQvEph9S8H0z2L9tL4/k4YwQY=; b=XzXfzsYBVW8vItzD2LweXTuidAuaWMjp46spZSIdP6T/4pUWrgVcN98lWFnMttXzqR UoZR2lXOE8oQGATsWrVqAAthsimYoZVodjA/Fa6gN1yoJNbqOQYk+mi7L+coa0e/23Ej uggi1hdhbzzMiIrpRT4DiTv5hrKtYhv50ys/aPuwo/gHC3g7Ix8vi4ftCN3IZtcGgA6P o8tYaAFAhnKzXzPtdcVswGHt87lTjpyesuNWUGdMs/5CTmE+8dXuOXHB5dCxDNgfzfek Rk5jAtLF/k5sSLaMSKeTbKCx9qts5r6h2JyVmQJYQrc8HRGLL2xPRd9Gu5/PzBmRvpdQ Jc2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzLU7nHoGQjUoejKXJppvTT2tmDl3rMxhNJPVDqy7XzHNMJVxao aO4N155OdVpf/dNg3TpN5PTcW0Lv24n8xdsBt2w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHg/hXmymU2h9ORl25YPw24GAYOieg8ZiQISTHms1Y1Bbc5JVuvCKnDRvWTxcgGV8/wrrIKSg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c951:b0:1ca:8e43:765d with SMTP id i17-20020a170902c95100b001ca8e43765dmr5342679pla.64.1699544691687; Thu, 09 Nov 2023 07:44:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-123-141.wavecable.com. [204.195.123.141]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a21-20020a170902ee9500b001c9ab91d3d7sm3698048pld.37.2023.11.09.07.44.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 09 Nov 2023 07:44:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 07:44:49 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Morten =?UTF-8?B?QnLDuHJ1cA==?= Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] pcapng: avoid using alloca() Message-ID: <20231109074449.1ba95e1b@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9EFFC@smartserver.smartshare.dk> References: <20230921042349.104150-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20231108183557.381955-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20231108183557.381955-5-stephen@networkplumber.org> <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9EFFC@smartserver.smartshare.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 09:21:22 +0100 Morten Br=C3=B8rup wrote: > I can't find the definition of BUFSIZ. Please make sure to add a comment = to the definition of BUFSIZ mentioning - like in your patch description - t= hat it will be more than sufficient for the info related blocks in the file. >=20 > More comments inline below, regarding existing bugs found while reviewing. >=20 >=20 > Assuming BUFSIZ has a comment describing the reason for its value, >=20 > Acked-by: Morten Br=C3=B8rup The constant BUFSIZ comes from stdio.h and used lots of places in libraries. It is 8192 in current glibc and unlikely to be a problem. Chose it because this a on stack buffer used before writing to a file which is similar to what stdio does. The library does not use stdio because most of the I/O is writing packets which needs to be fast and overhead of extra stdio buffer is harmful. Looking into using io_uring in a future version.