From: Kumara Parameshwaran <kumaraparamesh92@gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: hujiayu.hu@foxmail.com,
Kumara Parameshwaran <kumaraparamesh92@gmail.com>,
Kumara Parameshwaran <krathinavel@microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6] gro: fix reordering of packets in GRO layer
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 23:24:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231208175400.22388-1-kumaraparamesh92@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221101070557.58808-1-kumaraparmesh92@gmail.com>
In the current implementation when packets is received with
special flag(s) set, only that packet is delivered out of order.
There could be already coalesced packets in the GRO table
beloging to the same flow but not handled.
This fix makes sure that the entire segment is delivered with the
special flag(s) set which is how the Linux GRO is also implemented
Signed-off-by: Kumara Parameshwaran <kumaraparamesh92@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Kumara Parameshwaran <krathinavel@microsoft.com>
---
If the received packet is not a pure ACK packet, we check if
there are any previous packets in the flow, if present we indulge
the received packet also in the coalescing logic and update the flags
of the last recived packet to the entire segment which would avoid
re-ordering.
Lets say a case where P1(PSH), P2(ACK), P3(ACK) are received in burst mode,
P1 contains PSH flag and since it does not contain any prior packets in the flow
we copy it to unprocess_packets and P2(ACK) and P3(ACK) are merged together.
In the existing case the P2,P3 would be delivered as single segment first and the
unprocess_packets will be copied later which will cause reordering. With the patch
copy the unprocess packets first and then the packets from the GRO table.
Testing done
The csum test-pmd was modified to support the following
GET request of 10MB from client to server via test-pmd (static arp entries added in client
and server). Enable GRO and TSO in test-pmd where the packets recived from the client mac
would be sent to server mac and vice versa.
In above testing, without the patch the client observerd re-ordering of 25 packets
and with the patch there were no packet re-ordering observerd.
v2:
Fix warnings in commit and comment.
Do not consider packet as candidate to merge if it contains SYN/RST flag.
v3:
Fix warnings.
v4:
Rebase with master.
v5:
Adding co-author email
v6:
Address review comments from the maintainer to restructure the code
and handle only special flags PSH,FIN
lib/gro/gro_tcp.h | 10 +++++++
lib/gro/gro_tcp4.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/gro/gro_tcp.h b/lib/gro/gro_tcp.h
index d926c4b8cc..d2073b02f3 100644
--- a/lib/gro/gro_tcp.h
+++ b/lib/gro/gro_tcp.h
@@ -187,4 +187,14 @@ is_same_common_tcp_key(struct cmn_tcp_key *k1, struct cmn_tcp_key *k2)
return (!memcmp(k1, k2, sizeof(struct cmn_tcp_key)));
}
+static inline void
+update_tcp_hdr_flags(struct rte_tcp_hdr *tcp_hdr, struct rte_mbuf *pkt)
+{
+ struct rte_tcp_hdr *merged_tcp_hdr;
+
+ merged_tcp_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(pkt, struct rte_tcp_hdr *, pkt->l2_len + pkt->l3_len);
+ merged_tcp_hdr->tcp_flags |= tcp_hdr->tcp_flags;
+
+}
+
#endif
diff --git a/lib/gro/gro_tcp4.c b/lib/gro/gro_tcp4.c
index 6645de592b..6745ebc45e 100644
--- a/lib/gro/gro_tcp4.c
+++ b/lib/gro/gro_tcp4.c
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ gro_tcp4_reassemble(struct rte_mbuf *pkt,
uint32_t item_idx;
uint32_t i, max_flow_num, remaining_flow_num;
uint8_t find;
+ uint32_t item_start_idx;
/*
* Don't process the packet whose TCP header length is greater
@@ -139,13 +140,6 @@ gro_tcp4_reassemble(struct rte_mbuf *pkt,
tcp_hdr = (struct rte_tcp_hdr *)((char *)ipv4_hdr + pkt->l3_len);
hdr_len = pkt->l2_len + pkt->l3_len + pkt->l4_len;
- /*
- * Don't process the packet which has FIN, SYN, RST, PSH, URG, ECE
- * or CWR set.
- */
- if (tcp_hdr->tcp_flags != RTE_TCP_ACK_FLAG)
- return -1;
-
/* trim the tail padding bytes */
ip_tlen = rte_be_to_cpu_16(ipv4_hdr->total_length);
if (pkt->pkt_len > (uint32_t)(ip_tlen + pkt->l2_len))
@@ -183,6 +177,7 @@ gro_tcp4_reassemble(struct rte_mbuf *pkt,
if (tbl->flows[i].start_index != INVALID_ARRAY_INDEX) {
if (is_same_tcp4_flow(tbl->flows[i].key, key)) {
find = 1;
+ item_start_idx = tbl->flows[i].start_index;
break;
}
remaining_flow_num--;
@@ -190,28 +185,50 @@ gro_tcp4_reassemble(struct rte_mbuf *pkt,
}
if (find == 0) {
- sent_seq = rte_be_to_cpu_32(tcp_hdr->sent_seq);
- item_idx = insert_new_tcp_item(pkt, tbl->items, &tbl->item_num,
- tbl->max_item_num, start_time,
- INVALID_ARRAY_INDEX, sent_seq, ip_id,
- is_atomic);
- if (item_idx == INVALID_ARRAY_INDEX)
+ /*
+ * Add new flow to the table only if contains ACK flag with data.
+ * Do not add any packets with additional tcp flags to the GRO table
+ */
+ if (tcp_hdr->tcp_flags == RTE_TCP_ACK_FLAG) {
+ sent_seq = rte_be_to_cpu_32(tcp_hdr->sent_seq);
+ item_idx = insert_new_tcp_item(pkt, tbl->items, &tbl->item_num,
+ tbl->max_item_num, start_time,
+ INVALID_ARRAY_INDEX, sent_seq, ip_id,
+ is_atomic);
+ if (item_idx == INVALID_ARRAY_INDEX)
+ return -1;
+ if (insert_new_flow(tbl, &key, item_idx) ==
+ INVALID_ARRAY_INDEX) {
+ /*
+ * Fail to insert a new flow, so delete the
+ * stored packet.
+ */
+ delete_tcp_item(tbl->items, item_idx, &tbl->item_num, INVALID_ARRAY_INDEX);
+ return -1;
+ }
+ return 0;
+ } else {
return -1;
- if (insert_new_flow(tbl, &key, item_idx) ==
- INVALID_ARRAY_INDEX) {
- /*
- * Fail to insert a new flow, so delete the
- * stored packet.
- */
- delete_tcp_item(tbl->items, item_idx, &tbl->item_num, INVALID_ARRAY_INDEX);
+ }
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * Any packet with additional flags like PSH,FIN should be processed and flushed immediately.
+ * Hence marking the start time to 0, so that the packets will be flushed immediately in timer
+ * mode.
+ */
+ if (tcp_hdr->tcp_flags & (RTE_TCP_ACK_FLAG|RTE_TCP_PSH_FLAG|RTE_TCP_FIN_FLAG)) {
+ if (tcp_hdr->tcp_flags != RTE_TCP_ACK_FLAG) {
+ tbl->items[item_start_idx].start_time = 0;
+ }
+ return process_tcp_item(pkt, tcp_hdr, tcp_dl, tbl->items, tbl->flows[i].start_index,
+ &tbl->item_num, tbl->max_item_num,
+ ip_id, is_atomic, start_time);
+ } else {
return -1;
}
- return 0;
}
- return process_tcp_item(pkt, tcp_hdr, tcp_dl, tbl->items, tbl->flows[i].start_index,
- &tbl->item_num, tbl->max_item_num,
- ip_id, is_atomic, start_time);
+ return -1;
}
/*
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-08 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-13 10:18 [PATCH] gro : fix reordering of packets in GRO library Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-10-13 10:20 ` kumaraparameshwaran rathinavel
2022-10-28 8:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-10-28 8:27 ` [PATCH v3] " Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-10-28 9:51 ` [PATCH v4] " Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-11-01 7:05 ` [PATCH v5] " Kumara Parameshwaran
2023-06-19 13:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-06-20 7:35 ` Hu, Jiayu
2023-06-21 8:47 ` kumaraparameshwaran rathinavel
2023-06-30 11:32 ` kumaraparameshwaran rathinavel
2023-12-08 17:54 ` Kumara Parameshwaran [this message]
2023-12-08 18:05 ` [PATCH v7] gro: fix reordering of packets in GRO layer Kumara Parameshwaran
2023-12-08 18:12 ` [PATCH v8] " Kumara Parameshwaran
2023-12-08 18:17 ` [PATCH v9] " Kumara Parameshwaran
2024-01-04 15:49 ` 胡嘉瑜
2024-01-07 11:21 ` [PATCH v10] " Kumara Parameshwaran
2024-01-07 11:29 ` [PATCH v11] " Kumara Parameshwaran
2024-01-07 17:20 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-01-08 16:11 ` kumaraparameshwaran rathinavel
2024-01-08 15:50 ` [PATCH v12] " Kumara Parameshwaran
2024-01-08 16:04 ` [PATCH v13] " Kumara Parameshwaran
2024-01-16 14:28 ` 胡嘉瑜
2024-02-12 14:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231208175400.22388-1-kumaraparamesh92@gmail.com \
--to=kumaraparamesh92@gmail.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hujiayu.hu@foxmail.com \
--cc=krathinavel@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).