From: Vipin Varghese <vipin.varghese@amd.com>
To: <dev@dpdk.org>, <david.marchand@redhat.com>, <honest.jiang@foxmail.com>
Cc: "Vipin Varghese" <Vipin.Varghese@amd.com>,
"Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
"Thiyagrajan P" <thiyagarajan.p@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] app/dma-perf: replace pktmbuf with mempool objects
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 16:33:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231220110333.619-1-vipin.varghese@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231212103746.1910-1-vipin.varghese@amd.com>
From: Vipin Varghese <Vipin.Varghese@amd.com>
Replace pktmbuf pool with mempool, this allows increase in MOPS
especially in lower buffer size. Using Mempool, allows to reduce
the extra CPU cycles.
Changes made are
1. pktmbuf pool create with mempool create.
2. create src & dst pointer array from the appropaite numa.
3. use get pool and put for mempool objects.
4. remove pktmbuf_mtod for dma and cpu memcpy.
v2 changes:
- add ACK from Morten Brørup
v1 changes:
- pktmbuf pool create with mempool create.
- create src & dst pointer array from the appropaite numa.
- use get pool and put for mempool objects.
- remove pktmbuf_mtod for dma and cpu memcpy.
Test Results for pktmbuf vs mempool:
====================================
Format: Buffer Size | % AVG cycles | % AVG Gbps
Category-1: HW-DSA
-------------------
64|-13.11| 14.97
128|-41.49| 0.41
256| -1.85| 1.20
512| -9.38| 8.81
1024| 1.82| -2.00
1518| 0.00| -0.80
2048| 1.03| -0.91
4096| 0.00| -0.35
8192| 0.07| -0.08
Category-2: MEMCPY
-------------------
64|-12.50|14.14
128|-40.63|67.26
256|-38.78|59.35
512|-30.26|43.36
1024|-21.80|27.04
1518|-16.23|19.33
2048|-14.75|16.81
4096| -9.56|10.01
8192| -3.32| 3.12
Signed-off-by: Vipin Varghese <vipin.varghese@amd.com>
Acked-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Tested-by: Thiyagrajan P <thiyagarajan.p@amd.com>
---
---
app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
index 9b1f58c78c..dc6f16cc01 100644
--- a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
+++ b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
@@ -43,8 +43,8 @@ struct lcore_params {
uint16_t kick_batch;
uint32_t buf_size;
uint16_t test_secs;
- struct rte_mbuf **srcs;
- struct rte_mbuf **dsts;
+ void **srcs;
+ void **dsts;
volatile struct worker_info worker_info;
};
@@ -110,17 +110,17 @@ output_result(uint8_t scenario_id, uint32_t lcore_id, char *dma_name, uint16_t r
}
static inline void
-cache_flush_buf(__rte_unused struct rte_mbuf **array,
+cache_flush_buf(__rte_unused void **array,
__rte_unused uint32_t buf_size,
__rte_unused uint32_t nr_buf)
{
#ifdef RTE_ARCH_X86_64
char *data;
- struct rte_mbuf **srcs = array;
+ void **srcs = array;
uint32_t i, offset;
for (i = 0; i < nr_buf; i++) {
- data = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(srcs[i], char *);
+ data = (char *) srcs[i];
for (offset = 0; offset < buf_size; offset += 64)
__builtin_ia32_clflush(data + offset);
}
@@ -224,8 +224,8 @@ do_dma_mem_copy(void *p)
const uint32_t nr_buf = para->nr_buf;
const uint16_t kick_batch = para->kick_batch;
const uint32_t buf_size = para->buf_size;
- struct rte_mbuf **srcs = para->srcs;
- struct rte_mbuf **dsts = para->dsts;
+ void **srcs = para->srcs;
+ void **dsts = para->dsts;
uint16_t nr_cpl;
uint64_t async_cnt = 0;
uint32_t i;
@@ -241,8 +241,12 @@ do_dma_mem_copy(void *p)
while (1) {
for (i = 0; i < nr_buf; i++) {
dma_copy:
- ret = rte_dma_copy(dev_id, 0, rte_mbuf_data_iova(srcs[i]),
- rte_mbuf_data_iova(dsts[i]), buf_size, 0);
+ ret = rte_dma_copy(dev_id,
+ 0,
+ (rte_iova_t) srcs[i],
+ (rte_iova_t) dsts[i],
+ buf_size,
+ 0);
if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
if (ret == -ENOSPC) {
do_dma_submit_and_poll(dev_id, &async_cnt, worker_info);
@@ -276,8 +280,8 @@ do_cpu_mem_copy(void *p)
volatile struct worker_info *worker_info = &(para->worker_info);
const uint32_t nr_buf = para->nr_buf;
const uint32_t buf_size = para->buf_size;
- struct rte_mbuf **srcs = para->srcs;
- struct rte_mbuf **dsts = para->dsts;
+ void **srcs = para->srcs;
+ void **dsts = para->dsts;
uint32_t i;
worker_info->stop_flag = false;
@@ -288,8 +292,8 @@ do_cpu_mem_copy(void *p)
while (1) {
for (i = 0; i < nr_buf; i++) {
- const void *src = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(dsts[i], void *);
- void *dst = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(srcs[i], void *);
+ const void *src = (void *) dsts[i];
+ void *dst = (void *) srcs[i];
/* copy buffer form src to dst */
rte_memcpy(dst, src, (size_t)buf_size);
@@ -303,8 +307,8 @@ do_cpu_mem_copy(void *p)
}
static int
-setup_memory_env(struct test_configure *cfg, struct rte_mbuf ***srcs,
- struct rte_mbuf ***dsts)
+setup_memory_env(struct test_configure *cfg, void ***srcs,
+ void ***dsts)
{
unsigned int buf_size = cfg->buf_size.cur;
unsigned int nr_sockets;
@@ -317,47 +321,57 @@ setup_memory_env(struct test_configure *cfg, struct rte_mbuf ***srcs,
return -1;
}
- src_pool = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create("Benchmark_DMA_SRC",
+ src_pool = rte_mempool_create("Benchmark_DMA_SRC",
nr_buf,
+ buf_size,
0,
0,
- buf_size + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM,
- cfg->src_numa_node);
+ NULL,
+ NULL,
+ NULL,
+ NULL,
+ cfg->src_numa_node,
+ RTE_MEMPOOL_F_SP_PUT | RTE_MEMPOOL_F_SC_GET);
if (src_pool == NULL) {
PRINT_ERR("Error with source mempool creation.\n");
return -1;
}
- dst_pool = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create("Benchmark_DMA_DST",
+ dst_pool = rte_mempool_create("Benchmark_DMA_DST",
nr_buf,
+ buf_size,
0,
0,
- buf_size + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM,
- cfg->dst_numa_node);
+ NULL,
+ NULL,
+ NULL,
+ NULL,
+ cfg->dst_numa_node,
+ RTE_MEMPOOL_F_SP_PUT | RTE_MEMPOOL_F_SC_GET);
if (dst_pool == NULL) {
PRINT_ERR("Error with destination mempool creation.\n");
return -1;
}
- *srcs = rte_malloc(NULL, nr_buf * sizeof(struct rte_mbuf *), 0);
+ *srcs = rte_malloc_socket(NULL, nr_buf * sizeof(unsigned char *), 0, cfg->src_numa_node);
if (*srcs == NULL) {
printf("Error: srcs malloc failed.\n");
return -1;
}
- *dsts = rte_malloc(NULL, nr_buf * sizeof(struct rte_mbuf *), 0);
+ *dsts = rte_malloc_socket(NULL, nr_buf * sizeof(unsigned char *), 0, cfg->dst_numa_node);
if (*dsts == NULL) {
printf("Error: dsts malloc failed.\n");
return -1;
}
- if (rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk(src_pool, *srcs, nr_buf) != 0) {
- printf("alloc src mbufs failed.\n");
+ if (rte_mempool_get_bulk(src_pool, *srcs, nr_buf) != 0) {
+ printf("alloc src bufs failed.\n");
return -1;
}
- if (rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk(dst_pool, *dsts, nr_buf) != 0) {
- printf("alloc dst mbufs failed.\n");
+ if (rte_mempool_get_bulk(dst_pool, *dsts, nr_buf) != 0) {
+ printf("alloc dst bufs failed.\n");
return -1;
}
@@ -370,7 +384,7 @@ mem_copy_benchmark(struct test_configure *cfg, bool is_dma)
uint16_t i;
uint32_t offset;
unsigned int lcore_id = 0;
- struct rte_mbuf **srcs = NULL, **dsts = NULL;
+ void **srcs = NULL, **dsts = NULL;
struct lcore_dma_map_t *ldm = &cfg->lcore_dma_map;
unsigned int buf_size = cfg->buf_size.cur;
uint16_t kick_batch = cfg->kick_batch.cur;
@@ -478,9 +492,9 @@ mem_copy_benchmark(struct test_configure *cfg, bool is_dma)
out:
/* free mbufs used in the test */
if (srcs != NULL)
- rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(srcs, nr_buf);
+ rte_mempool_put_bulk(src_pool, srcs, nr_buf);
if (dsts != NULL)
- rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(dsts, nr_buf);
+ rte_mempool_put_bulk(dst_pool, dsts, nr_buf);
/* free the points for the mbufs */
rte_free(srcs);
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-20 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-12 10:37 [PATCH] " Vipin Varghese
2023-12-12 11:40 ` Morten Brørup
2023-12-12 14:38 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-12-12 15:16 ` Morten Brørup
2023-12-12 15:37 ` Bruce Richardson
2023-12-12 17:13 ` Varghese, Vipin
2023-12-12 18:09 ` Morten Brørup
2023-12-12 18:13 ` Varghese, Vipin
2023-12-20 9:17 ` Varghese, Vipin
2023-12-20 9:21 ` David Marchand
2023-12-20 11:03 ` Vipin Varghese [this message]
2024-02-26 2:05 ` [PATCH v2] " fengchengwen
2024-02-27 9:57 ` Varghese, Vipin
2024-02-27 12:27 ` fengchengwen
2024-02-28 3:08 ` Varghese, Vipin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231220110333.619-1-vipin.varghese@amd.com \
--to=vipin.varghese@amd.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=honest.jiang@foxmail.com \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=thiyagarajan.p@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).