DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Dariusz Sosnowski <dsosnowski@nvidia.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	"Ori Kam" <orika@nvidia.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ethdev: fast path async flow API
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 09:16:57 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231228091657.14769682@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231227105709.1951231-1-dsosnowski@nvidia.com>


> However, at the moment I see one problem with this approach.
> It would require DPDK to expose the rte_eth_dev struct definition,
> because of implied locking implemented in the flow API.

This is a blocker, showstopper for me.

Have you considered having something like
   rte_flow_create_bulk()

or better yet a Linux iouring style API?

A ring style API would allow for better mixed operations across
the board and get rid of the I-cache overhead which is the root
cause of the needing inline.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-28 17:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-27 10:57 Dariusz Sosnowski
2023-12-27 17:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-12-27 17:41 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-12-28 13:53   ` Dariusz Sosnowski
2023-12-28 14:10     ` Ivan Malov
2024-01-03 18:01       ` Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-01-03 18:29         ` Ivan Malov
2024-01-04 13:13           ` Dariusz Sosnowski
2023-12-28 17:16 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2024-01-03 19:14   ` Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-01-04  1:07     ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-01-23 11:37       ` Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-01-29 13:38         ` Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-01-29 17:36           ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-01-30 12:06             ` Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-01-30 12:17               ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-01-30 16:08                 ` Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-01-04  8:47     ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-01-04 16:08       ` Dariusz Sosnowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231228091657.14769682@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dsosnowski@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=orika@nvidia.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).