* [PATCH 0/2] app/test-crypto-perf: fix multi-segment issue
@ 2024-01-03 4:00 Suanming Mou
2024-01-03 4:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] app/test-crypto-perf: fix copy segment size calculation Suanming Mou
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Suanming Mou @ 2024-01-03 4:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ciara.power; +Cc: dev
This commit fixes the bugs in multi-segment size calculation.
*** BLURB HERE ***
Suanming Mou (2):
app/test-crypto-perf: fix copy segment size calculation
app/test-crypto-perf: fix dst_mbuf size calculation
app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_test_common.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] app/test-crypto-perf: fix copy segment size calculation
2024-01-03 4:00 [PATCH 0/2] app/test-crypto-perf: fix multi-segment issue Suanming Mou
@ 2024-01-03 4:00 ` Suanming Mou
2024-02-01 13:16 ` Suanming Mou
2024-01-03 4:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] app/test-crypto-perf: fix dst_mbuf " Suanming Mou
2024-02-29 17:01 ` [EXT] [PATCH 0/2] app/test-crypto-perf: fix multi-segment issue Akhil Goyal
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Suanming Mou @ 2024-01-03 4:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ciara.power; +Cc: dev
For the case crypto device requires headroom and tailroom,
the segment_sz in options also contains the headroom_sz
and tailroom_sz, but mbuf's data_len is user's segment_sz
without headroom_sz and tailroom_sz. That means the data
size to be copied should use user's segment_sz instead
of options->segment_sz.
This commit fixes the copy segment size calculation.
Fixes: 14864c4217ce ("test/crypto-perf: populate mbuf in latency test")
Signed-off-by: Suanming Mou <suanmingm@nvidia.com>
---
app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_test_common.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_test_common.c b/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_test_common.c
index ad2076dd2e..8faf832527 100644
--- a/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_test_common.c
+++ b/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_test_common.c
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ cperf_mbuf_set(struct rte_mbuf *mbuf,
const struct cperf_options *options,
const struct cperf_test_vector *test_vector)
{
- uint32_t segment_sz = options->segment_sz;
+ uint32_t segment_sz = options->segment_sz - options->headroom_sz - options->tailroom_sz;
uint8_t *mbuf_data;
uint8_t *test_data;
uint32_t remaining_bytes = options->max_buffer_size;
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH 1/2] app/test-crypto-perf: fix copy segment size calculation
2024-01-03 4:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] app/test-crypto-perf: fix copy segment size calculation Suanming Mou
@ 2024-02-01 13:16 ` Suanming Mou
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Suanming Mou @ 2024-02-01 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ciara.power, anoobj; +Cc: dev
Hi,
I saw other crypto perf fixes are reviewed, any chance to take a look at this series?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Suanming Mou <suanmingm@nvidia.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2024 12:00 PM
> To: ciara.power@intel.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] app/test-crypto-perf: fix copy segment size calculation
>
> For the case crypto device requires headroom and tailroom, the segment_sz in
> options also contains the headroom_sz and tailroom_sz, but mbuf's data_len is
> user's segment_sz without headroom_sz and tailroom_sz. That means the data
> size to be copied should use user's segment_sz instead of options->segment_sz.
>
> This commit fixes the copy segment size calculation.
>
> Fixes: 14864c4217ce ("test/crypto-perf: populate mbuf in latency test")
>
> Signed-off-by: Suanming Mou <suanmingm@nvidia.com>
> ---
> app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_test_common.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_test_common.c b/app/test-crypto-
> perf/cperf_test_common.c
> index ad2076dd2e..8faf832527 100644
> --- a/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_test_common.c
> +++ b/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_test_common.c
> @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ cperf_mbuf_set(struct rte_mbuf *mbuf,
> const struct cperf_options *options,
> const struct cperf_test_vector *test_vector) {
> - uint32_t segment_sz = options->segment_sz;
> + uint32_t segment_sz = options->segment_sz - options->headroom_sz -
> +options->tailroom_sz;
> uint8_t *mbuf_data;
> uint8_t *test_data;
> uint32_t remaining_bytes = options->max_buffer_size;
> --
> 2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] app/test-crypto-perf: fix dst_mbuf size calculation
2024-01-03 4:00 [PATCH 0/2] app/test-crypto-perf: fix multi-segment issue Suanming Mou
2024-01-03 4:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] app/test-crypto-perf: fix copy segment size calculation Suanming Mou
@ 2024-01-03 4:00 ` Suanming Mou
2024-02-29 17:01 ` [EXT] [PATCH 0/2] app/test-crypto-perf: fix multi-segment issue Akhil Goyal
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Suanming Mou @ 2024-01-03 4:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ciara.power; +Cc: dev
If crypto device requires headroom and tailroom, the mbuf
of dst in out-of-place should reserve the headroom and
tailroom as well, otherwise there will be no enough room
for dst mbuf.
Fixes: bf9d6702eca9 ("app/crypto-perf: use single mempool")
Signed-off-by: Suanming Mou <suanmingm@nvidia.com>
---
app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_test_common.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_test_common.c b/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_test_common.c
index 8faf832527..c773dd48df 100644
--- a/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_test_common.c
+++ b/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_test_common.c
@@ -229,7 +229,8 @@ cperf_alloc_common_memory(const struct cperf_options *options,
(mbuf_size * segments_nb);
params.dst_buf_offset = *dst_buf_offset;
/* Destination buffer will be one segment only */
- obj_size += max_size + sizeof(struct rte_mbuf);
+ obj_size += max_size + sizeof(struct rte_mbuf) +
+ options->headroom_sz + options->tailroom_sz;
}
*pool = rte_mempool_create_empty(pool_name,
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: [EXT] [PATCH 0/2] app/test-crypto-perf: fix multi-segment issue
2024-01-03 4:00 [PATCH 0/2] app/test-crypto-perf: fix multi-segment issue Suanming Mou
2024-01-03 4:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] app/test-crypto-perf: fix copy segment size calculation Suanming Mou
2024-01-03 4:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] app/test-crypto-perf: fix dst_mbuf " Suanming Mou
@ 2024-02-29 17:01 ` Akhil Goyal
2024-02-29 17:03 ` Akhil Goyal
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Akhil Goyal @ 2024-02-29 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Suanming Mou, ciara.power; +Cc: dev
> This commit fixes the bugs in multi-segment size calculation.
>
> Suanming Mou (2):
> app/test-crypto-perf: fix copy segment size calculation
> app/test-crypto-perf: fix dst_mbuf size calculation
>
> app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_test_common.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
Series Acked-by: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
Applied to dpdk-next-crypto
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: [EXT] [PATCH 0/2] app/test-crypto-perf: fix multi-segment issue
2024-02-29 17:01 ` [EXT] [PATCH 0/2] app/test-crypto-perf: fix multi-segment issue Akhil Goyal
@ 2024-02-29 17:03 ` Akhil Goyal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Akhil Goyal @ 2024-02-29 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Suanming Mou, ciara.power; +Cc: dev, stable
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akhil Goyal
> Sent: Thursday, February 29, 2024 10:31 PM
> To: Suanming Mou <suanmingm@nvidia.com>; ciara.power@intel.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH 0/2] app/test-crypto-perf: fix multi-segment issue
>
> > This commit fixes the bugs in multi-segment size calculation.
> >
> > Suanming Mou (2):
> > app/test-crypto-perf: fix copy segment size calculation
> > app/test-crypto-perf: fix dst_mbuf size calculation
> >
> > app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_test_common.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> Series Acked-by: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
> Applied to dpdk-next-crypto
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-29 17:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-01-03 4:00 [PATCH 0/2] app/test-crypto-perf: fix multi-segment issue Suanming Mou
2024-01-03 4:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] app/test-crypto-perf: fix copy segment size calculation Suanming Mou
2024-02-01 13:16 ` Suanming Mou
2024-01-03 4:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] app/test-crypto-perf: fix dst_mbuf " Suanming Mou
2024-02-29 17:01 ` [EXT] [PATCH 0/2] app/test-crypto-perf: fix multi-segment issue Akhil Goyal
2024-02-29 17:03 ` Akhil Goyal
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).