From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFF243867; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 18:18:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21B340273; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 18:18:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pl1-f178.google.com (mail-pl1-f178.google.com [209.85.214.178]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3981B40261 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 18:18:55 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pl1-f178.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1d4a2526a7eso7446765ad.3 for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 09:18:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1704734334; x=1705339134; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ZNmtmGwMPnU8/if+iowgJpB05yBs6Y19TIQg5I2RThw=; b=fBPnjK/JjLGPb2f/HN+lx9Rfkuz3+nvVokPF1Dgl1NN/EguzL7nm/gHmSleVvXJ9Ot 3O7ReJvdsnOfNqeiyDyflGCZa00YgxPKrAkPxETfo62P7sRVGGSksQ/z7C6qzlUTThMa CoE7FVh0sMQHd6TBd5EEHwzmH7/UfpBeHbfPX+x+tcWJpjcNleippqMmKpB6V173ogtR z4naDXcCUVpTPFGbGsBA1yK6pa1y6cTiRkz+Pki0xYemsTT+qkoR+D+ejynS51yE15th GtlHwKTKbFxnhYFjEU3Fd42XgHkSNFpKc1SfsGqny4XTmTpCz5gjOzMhMy3JemDygvLA OHBg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704734334; x=1705339134; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZNmtmGwMPnU8/if+iowgJpB05yBs6Y19TIQg5I2RThw=; b=u+9mAiwV2C9Sd8M1AY3OnOmBnClXfbCCoT5DyYNPUKffPnZnWcTbn3QKrhkXHWnm3/ 6DJkRmZtp0t1P+L5BefBPfHrlJox625/PwS45rBy/dUnivACst3d2ssBjm9t5P+EYr8N zK3K2OnZrB0QzoQstWPoDcOWc63K7f5M9bxZyVMRcF9eF1hOPyHVb0F1tS0ykRizDRlQ Vlq7Ten0W1fTOIpaREx6oktN+FXA4Sg+9HmxG6rk6gPgabhBB4fDcl8KqO5fmoGaJ1fk zaOsFP4wmRneDYa4GAticyjolPjJ6QcyCmC9Lit27YIee9Sw8QxFk5czlpf1SHUOsPJi 0pdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwLHylhqXwfRJ+uUyxUgt1sZZM2ys4xZxgHqpzEprl0y02AqksA 02XqYHAfDaAr/pe0wNbFwiKUtzqqHfsTIQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEWxVXgfXxmi05WBLAJZVC9hvpfWR+8yTpUO0nQ4luqO7GKReZI79aH7X/8amcRy3+H0oUE6A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2807:b0:1d4:c9ec:f8c3 with SMTP id kp7-20020a170903280700b001d4c9ecf8c3mr1153045plb.33.1704734334299; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 09:18:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-123-141.wavecable.com. [204.195.123.141]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jg5-20020a17090326c500b001d4ac461a6fsm154516plb.86.2024.01.08.09.18.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 08 Jan 2024 09:18:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 09:18:52 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Jerin Jacob Cc: Hemant Agrawal , "jerinj@marvell.com" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "techboard@dpdk.org" , Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [v5] doc: define qualification criteria for external library Message-ID: <20240108091852.16bec447@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: References: <20240105123042.4007877-1-jerinj@marvell.com> <20240108075850.4151361-1-jerinj@marvell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 14:01:37 +0530 Jerin Jacob wrote: > On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 1:47=E2=80=AFPM Hemant Agrawal wrote: > > > > > > On 08-Jan-24 1:28 PM, jerinj@marvell.com wrote: =20 > > > From: Jerin Jacob > > > > > > Define qualification criteria for external library > > > based on a techboard meeting minutes [1] and past > > > learnings from mailing list discussion. > > > > > > [1] > > > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2019-June/135847.html > > > https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2024-January/284849.html > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob > > > Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon =20 >=20 > > > +#. **Distributions License:** > > > + > > > + - No specific constraints beyond documentation. =20 > > > > Though we are not mandatory open distribution. However we should ask fo= r the > > defining the distribution aspect clearly in the library. =20 >=20 > How about following then, >=20 > No specific constraints, but clear documentation on distribution usage > aspects is required. >=20 > If not, please suggest the exact wording. The wording specifies the intent here, and that is not what matters. This is not a legal document where someone will take us to court if the board doesn't accept a library.