DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Cc: "Patrick Robb" <probb@iol.unh.edu>,
	"Aaron Conole" <aconole@redhat.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: update minimum Linux kernel version
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 11:54:50 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240111115450.3777aea5@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F130@smartserver.smartshare.dk>

On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 20:26:56 +0100
Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com> wrote:

>  
> 
> When the documentation specifies a minimum required kernel version, it implicitly claims that DPDK works with that kernel version.
> 
> So we should either test with the specified kernel version (which requires significant effort to set up, so I’m not going to ask for it!), or add a big fat disclaimer/warning that DPDK is not tested with the mentioned kernel version, and list the kernel versions actually tested.

It is much less of an issue than it used to be since there should be no need for
DPDK specific kernel components. The kernel API/ABI is stable across releases 
(with the notable exception of BPF). Therefore the DPDK kernel version dependency
is much less than it used to be.

Poking around the source, still see some leftovers.

Like quick assist documentation wanting kernel version for sources?
Why does QAT depend on kernel source being present. Thats not right.

The other bad spot is the Intel GVE driver reading and passing
the OS version in. Looks like some host side validation.

Putting OS version anywhere in DPDK is a mistake.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-11 19:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-10 16:57 Stephen Hemminger
2024-01-11  9:18 ` Morten Brørup
2024-01-11 18:48   ` Aaron Conole
2024-01-11 19:02   ` Patrick Robb
2024-01-11 19:26     ` Morten Brørup
2024-01-11 19:50       ` Patrick Robb
2024-01-11 19:54       ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2024-01-11 22:38         ` Morten Brørup
2024-02-16  3:05           ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-02-16  8:29             ` Morten Brørup
2024-02-16 17:22               ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-02-16 17:42               ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-02-17 19:48                 ` Patrick Robb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240111115450.3777aea5@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=probb@iol.unh.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).