From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DADC439F8; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 06:35:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E18340A72; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 06:35:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DA1A406FF for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 06:35:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B60A720E67C9; Sun, 28 Jan 2024 21:35:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com B60A720E67C9 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1706506509; bh=bBpJs2hx4dW1inQ1WxHoQsDGRQu3mzKVBmi5bqRAUPI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=qDJyPulDJtxQCD8cSwkSMAQzsHu3xDm0yud0qcWuph213U/mnZUmXs+zBZ7hIQkTc rlkemD9UCDlpM5JsJH3e1LC4UTxF8piCEMeZeSHeUN8Waf1y4IQ/t5lV7seVdRhnHd uNiB1RLWpF5+mvYvZ/jPipQRxiEEXAne1V2oup9A= Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 21:35:08 -0800 From: Rahul Gupta <rahulgupt@linux.microsoft.com> To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> Cc: dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net, bruce.richardson@intel.com, dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, sovaradh@linux.microsoft.com, okaya@kernel.org, sujithsankar@microsoft.com, sowmini.varadhan@microsoft.com, krathinavel@microsoft.com, rahulrgupta27@gmail.com Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] eal: refactor rte_eal_init into sub-functions Message-ID: <20240129053508.GB6963@microsoft.com> References: <1706103911-6907-1-git-send-email-rahulgupt@linux.microsoft.com> <CAJFAV8xfFysgYinCGuMcQ6zRMPCTZPCFfOOifdwvtYrmUwYeZw@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8xfFysgYinCGuMcQ6zRMPCTZPCFfOOifdwvtYrmUwYeZw@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On (01/24/24 16:53), David Marchand wrote: > Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:53:33 +0100 > From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> > To: Rahul Gupta <rahulgupt@linux.microsoft.com> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net, bruce.richardson@intel.com, > dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, > sovaradh@linux.microsoft.com, okaya@kernel.org, > sujithsankar@microsoft.com, sowmini.varadhan@microsoft.com, > krathinavel@microsoft.com, rahulrgupta27@gmail.com, Rahul Gupta > <rahulgupt@microsoft.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] eal: refactor rte_eal_init into > sub-functions > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 2:45 PM Rahul Gupta > <rahulgupt@linux.microsoft.com> wrote: > > > > From: Rahul Gupta <rahulgupt@microsoft.com> > > > > In continuation to the following email, I am sending this patch. > > (https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/20231110172523.GA17466@microsoft.com/) > > > > Initialization requires rte_eal_init + rte_pktmbuf_pool_create which > > can consume a total time of 500-600 ms: > > a) For many devices FLR may take a significant chunk of time > > (200-250 ms in our use-case), this FLR is triggered during device > > probe in rte_eal_init(). > > b) rte_pktmbuf_pool_create() can consume up to 300-350 ms for > > applications that require huge memory. > > > > This cost is incurred on each restart (which happens in our use-case > > during binary updates for servicing). > > This patch provides an optimization using pthreads that applications > > can use and which can save 200-230ms. > > > > In this patch, rte_eal_init() is refactored into two parts- > > a) 1st part is dependent code ie- it’s a perquisite of the FLR and > > mempool creation. So this code needs to be executed before any > > pthreads. Its named as rte_eal_init_setup() > > b) 2nd part of code is independent code ie- it can execute in parallel > > to mempool creation in a pthread. Its named as rte_eal_init_async_setup(). > > > > In existing applications no changes are required unless they wish to leverage > > the optimization. > > > > If the application wants to leverage this optimization, then it needs to call > > rte_eal_init_async() (instead of call rte_eal_init()), then it can create a > > thread using rte_eal_remote_launch() to schedule a task it would like todo in > > parallel rte_eal_init_async_setup(), this task can be a mbuf pool creation > > using- rte_pktmbuf_pool_create() > > > > After this, if next operations require completion of above task, then > > user can use rte_eal_init_wait_async_setup_complete(), > > or if user wants to just check status of that thread, then use- > > rte_eal_init_async_setup_done() > > Looking at what this patch does.. I am under the impression all you > really need is rte_eal_init without initial probing. > Such behavior can probably be achieved with a allowlist set to a non > existing device (like for example "-a 0000:00:00.0"), then later, use > device hotplug. The patch will be useful to all the adapters irrespective of their host plug support. > > Some quick note on this patch. > > - don't expose symbols externally if they are only for internal use in > the same library, done in next patch. > - current version is 24.03, not 24.01 (wrt comment in version.map), done > - other OSes are not handled by this patch, please do the work for > FreeBSD and Windows, I can send patch to support non-linux OS, but due to lack of setup, I will need help to test same. Also, I am planning to do the porting at the end (ie after incorporating all review comments, in order to prevent duplication of efforts). > - as a followup of the previous point, please check if we can share > code between OSes and, if so, move the shared code to lib/eal/common, The code for rte_eal_init() is different for all three distros, (even if I consider just the 1st part of rte_eal_init() ie rte_eal_init_setup()). So its difficult to move to common dir. We will have todo it separately for all OS. > - did you test this series with multiprocess? Yes it works fine, I have tested it with simple_mp app. > - why should telemetry and other parts of the current rte_eal_init() > be left in the second stage of this initialisation pipeline? Actually motivation of this patch was todo most of the work in parallel ie in second stage, so not only probe/FLR but telemetry and any other work which can be executed in parallel are done here. (pls refer to the link in the commit message for more details) > > > -- > David Marchand Thanks for the reviewing, my comments are inline. Thanks, Rahul.