* [PATCH] net/tap: allow more that 4 queues
@ 2024-02-29 17:56 Stephen Hemminger
2024-03-06 16:14 ` Ferruh Yigit
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2024-02-29 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: Stephen Hemminger
The tap device needs to exchange file descriptors for tx and rx.
But the EAL MP layer has limit of 8 file descriptors per message.
The ideal resolution would be to increase the number of file
descriptors allowed for rte_mp_sendmsg(), but this would break
the ABI. Workaround the constraint by breaking into multiple messages.
Do not hide errors about MP message failures.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
index 69d9da695bed..df18c328f498 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
@@ -863,21 +863,44 @@ tap_mp_req_on_rxtx(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
msg.fds[fd_iterator++] = process_private->txq_fds[i];
msg.num_fds++;
request_param->txq_count++;
+
+ /* Need to break request into chunks */
+ if (fd_iterator >= RTE_MP_MAX_FD_NUM) {
+ err = rte_mp_sendmsg(&msg);
+ if (err < 0)
+ goto fail;
+
+ fd_iterator = 0;
+ msg.num_fds = 0;
+ request_param->txq_count = 0;
+ }
}
for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++) {
msg.fds[fd_iterator++] = process_private->rxq_fds[i];
msg.num_fds++;
request_param->rxq_count++;
+
+ if (fd_iterator >= RTE_MP_MAX_FD_NUM) {
+ err = rte_mp_sendmsg(&msg);
+ if (err < 0)
+ goto fail;
+
+ fd_iterator = 0;
+ msg.num_fds = 0;
+ request_param->rxq_count = 0;
+ }
}
- err = rte_mp_sendmsg(&msg);
- if (err < 0) {
- TAP_LOG(ERR, "Failed to send start req to secondary %d",
- rte_errno);
- return -1;
+ if (msg.num_fds > 0) {
+ err = rte_mp_sendmsg(&msg);
+ if (err < 0)
+ goto fail;
}
return 0;
+fail:
+ TAP_LOG(ERR, "Failed to send start req to secondary %d", rte_errno);
+ return err;
}
static int
@@ -885,8 +908,11 @@ tap_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
{
int err, i;
- if (rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_PRIMARY)
- tap_mp_req_on_rxtx(dev);
+ if (rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) {
+ err = tap_mp_req_on_rxtx(dev);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
err = tap_intr_handle_set(dev, 1);
if (err)
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net/tap: allow more that 4 queues
2024-02-29 17:56 [PATCH] net/tap: allow more that 4 queues Stephen Hemminger
@ 2024-03-06 16:14 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-03-06 20:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2024-03-06 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger, dev
On 2/29/2024 5:56 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The tap device needs to exchange file descriptors for tx and rx.
> But the EAL MP layer has limit of 8 file descriptors per message.
> The ideal resolution would be to increase the number of file
> descriptors allowed for rte_mp_sendmsg(), but this would break
> the ABI. Workaround the constraint by breaking into multiple messages.
>
> Do not hide errors about MP message failures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> index 69d9da695bed..df18c328f498 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> @@ -863,21 +863,44 @@ tap_mp_req_on_rxtx(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> msg.fds[fd_iterator++] = process_private->txq_fds[i];
> msg.num_fds++;
> request_param->txq_count++;
> +
> + /* Need to break request into chunks */
> + if (fd_iterator >= RTE_MP_MAX_FD_NUM) {
> + err = rte_mp_sendmsg(&msg);
> + if (err < 0)
> + goto fail;
> +
> + fd_iterator = 0;
> + msg.num_fds = 0;
> + request_param->txq_count = 0;
> + }
> }
> for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++) {
> msg.fds[fd_iterator++] = process_private->rxq_fds[i];
> msg.num_fds++;
> request_param->rxq_count++;
> +
> + if (fd_iterator >= RTE_MP_MAX_FD_NUM) {
> + err = rte_mp_sendmsg(&msg);
> + if (err < 0)
> + goto fail;
> +
> + fd_iterator = 0;
> + msg.num_fds = 0;
> + request_param->rxq_count = 0;
> + }
> }
Hi Stephen,
Did you able to verify with more than 4 queues?
As far as I can see, in the secondary counterpart of the
'rte_mp_sendmsg()', each time secondary index starts from 0, and
subsequent calls overwrites the fds in secondary.
So practically still only 4 queues works.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net/tap: allow more that 4 queues
2024-03-06 16:14 ` Ferruh Yigit
@ 2024-03-06 20:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-03-07 10:25 ` Ferruh Yigit
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2024-03-06 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ferruh Yigit; +Cc: dev
On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 16:14:51 +0000
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com> wrote:
> On 2/29/2024 5:56 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > The tap device needs to exchange file descriptors for tx and rx.
> > But the EAL MP layer has limit of 8 file descriptors per message.
> > The ideal resolution would be to increase the number of file
> > descriptors allowed for rte_mp_sendmsg(), but this would break
> > the ABI. Workaround the constraint by breaking into multiple messages.
> >
> > Do not hide errors about MP message failures.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> > index 69d9da695bed..df18c328f498 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> > @@ -863,21 +863,44 @@ tap_mp_req_on_rxtx(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> > msg.fds[fd_iterator++] = process_private->txq_fds[i];
> > msg.num_fds++;
> > request_param->txq_count++;
> > +
> > + /* Need to break request into chunks */
> > + if (fd_iterator >= RTE_MP_MAX_FD_NUM) {
> > + err = rte_mp_sendmsg(&msg);
> > + if (err < 0)
> > + goto fail;
> > +
> > + fd_iterator = 0;
> > + msg.num_fds = 0;
> > + request_param->txq_count = 0;
> > + }
> > }
> > for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++) {
> > msg.fds[fd_iterator++] = process_private->rxq_fds[i];
> > msg.num_fds++;
> > request_param->rxq_count++;
> > +
> > + if (fd_iterator >= RTE_MP_MAX_FD_NUM) {
> > + err = rte_mp_sendmsg(&msg);
> > + if (err < 0)
> > + goto fail;
> > +
> > + fd_iterator = 0;
> > + msg.num_fds = 0;
> > + request_param->rxq_count = 0;
> > + }
> > }
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Did you able to verify with more than 4 queues?
>
> As far as I can see, in the secondary counterpart of the
> 'rte_mp_sendmsg()', each time secondary index starts from 0, and
> subsequent calls overwrites the fds in secondary.
> So practically still only 4 queues works.
I got 4 queues setup, but looks like they are trash in secondary.
Probably best to revert this and fix it by bumping RTE_MP_MAX_FD_NUM.
This is better, but does take some ABI issue handling.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net/tap: allow more that 4 queues
2024-03-06 20:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
@ 2024-03-07 10:25 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-03-07 16:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2024-03-07 10:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger; +Cc: dev
On 3/6/2024 8:21 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 16:14:51 +0000
> Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/29/2024 5:56 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>> The tap device needs to exchange file descriptors for tx and rx.
>>> But the EAL MP layer has limit of 8 file descriptors per message.
>>> The ideal resolution would be to increase the number of file
>>> descriptors allowed for rte_mp_sendmsg(), but this would break
>>> the ABI. Workaround the constraint by breaking into multiple messages.
>>>
>>> Do not hide errors about MP message failures.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
>>> index 69d9da695bed..df18c328f498 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
>>> @@ -863,21 +863,44 @@ tap_mp_req_on_rxtx(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>>> msg.fds[fd_iterator++] = process_private->txq_fds[i];
>>> msg.num_fds++;
>>> request_param->txq_count++;
>>> +
>>> + /* Need to break request into chunks */
>>> + if (fd_iterator >= RTE_MP_MAX_FD_NUM) {
>>> + err = rte_mp_sendmsg(&msg);
>>> + if (err < 0)
>>> + goto fail;
>>> +
>>> + fd_iterator = 0;
>>> + msg.num_fds = 0;
>>> + request_param->txq_count = 0;
>>> + }
>>> }
>>> for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++) {
>>> msg.fds[fd_iterator++] = process_private->rxq_fds[i];
>>> msg.num_fds++;
>>> request_param->rxq_count++;
>>> +
>>> + if (fd_iterator >= RTE_MP_MAX_FD_NUM) {
>>> + err = rte_mp_sendmsg(&msg);
>>> + if (err < 0)
>>> + goto fail;
>>> +
>>> + fd_iterator = 0;
>>> + msg.num_fds = 0;
>>> + request_param->rxq_count = 0;
>>> + }
>>> }
>>
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> Did you able to verify with more than 4 queues?
>>
>> As far as I can see, in the secondary counterpart of the
>> 'rte_mp_sendmsg()', each time secondary index starts from 0, and
>> subsequent calls overwrites the fds in secondary.
>> So practically still only 4 queues works.
>
> I got 4 queues setup, but looks like they are trash in secondary.
> Probably best to revert this and fix it by bumping RTE_MP_MAX_FD_NUM.
> This is better, but does take some ABI issue handling.
>
We can increase RTE_MP_MAX_FD_NUM but still there will be a limit.
Can't it be possible to update 'rte_mp_sendmsg()' to support multiple
'rte_mp_sendmsg()' calls in this patch?
Also need to check if fds size is less than 'RTE_PMD_TAP_MAX_QUEUES'
with multiple 'rte_mp_sendmsg()' call support.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net/tap: allow more that 4 queues
2024-03-07 10:25 ` Ferruh Yigit
@ 2024-03-07 16:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2024-03-07 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ferruh Yigit; +Cc: dev
On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 10:25:48 +0000
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com> wrote:
> > I got 4 queues setup, but looks like they are trash in secondary.
> > Probably best to revert this and fix it by bumping RTE_MP_MAX_FD_NUM.
> > This is better, but does take some ABI issue handling.
> >
>
> We can increase RTE_MP_MAX_FD_NUM but still there will be a limit.
>
> Can't it be possible to update 'rte_mp_sendmsg()' to support multiple
> 'rte_mp_sendmsg()' calls in this patch?
>
> Also need to check if fds size is less than 'RTE_PMD_TAP_MAX_QUEUES'
> with multiple 'rte_mp_sendmsg()' call support.
Kernel allows up to 253 fd's to be passed.
So for tap that would limit it to 126 queues; because TAP dups the
fd's for rx and tx but that could be fixable.
Tap should have a static assert about max queues and this as well.
Increasing RTE_MP_MAX_FD_NUM would also fix similar issues in af_xdp PMD
and when af_packet gets MP support.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-03-07 16:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-29 17:56 [PATCH] net/tap: allow more that 4 queues Stephen Hemminger
2024-03-06 16:14 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-03-06 20:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-03-07 10:25 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-03-07 16:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).