From: Daniel Gregory <daniel.gregory@bytedance.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@bytedance.com>,
Liang Ma <liangma@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal/arm: replace RTE_BUILD_BUG on non-constant
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 10:46:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240503094605.GB3883350@ste-uk-lab-gw> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240502144826.42d7012a@hermes.local>
On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 02:48:26PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> There are already constant checks like this elsewhere in the file.
Yes, but they're in macros, rather than inlined functions, so my
understanding was that at compile time, macro expansion has put the
memorder constant in the _Static_assert call as opposed to still being
a function parameter in the inline definition.
This is also the same approach used by the generic implementation
(lib/eal/include/generic/rte_pause.h), the inline functions use assert
and the macros use RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON.
To give a minimal example, the following inline function doesn't
compile (Godbolt demo here https://godbolt.org/z/aPqTf3v4o ):
static inline __attribute__((always_inline)) void
add(int *dst, int val)
{
_Static_assert(val != 0, "adding zero does nothing");
*dst += val;
}
But as a macro it does ( https://godbolt.org/z/x4a8fTf8h ):
#define add(dst, val) do { \
_Static_assert(val != 0, "adding zero does nothing"); \
*(dst) += (val); \
} while(0);
I don't believe this is a compiler bug as both GCC and Clang produce the
same error message.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-03 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-02 14:21 Daniel Gregory
2024-05-02 16:20 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-05-02 17:44 ` Daniel Gregory
2024-05-02 18:27 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-05-02 21:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-05-03 9:46 ` Daniel Gregory [this message]
2024-05-04 0:56 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-05-09 11:02 ` Daniel Gregory
2024-05-03 13:32 ` David Marchand
2024-05-03 14:21 ` Daniel Gregory
2024-05-03 18:27 ` [PATCH v2] " Daniel Gregory
2024-05-03 18:30 ` Daniel Gregory
2024-05-04 0:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-06-27 15:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-06-28 10:05 ` Daniel Gregory
2024-06-28 15:19 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-05-06 9:30 ` Ruifeng Wang
2024-05-11 17:00 ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-10-04 17:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-08 9:47 ` Morten Brørup
2024-05-04 1:02 ` [PATCH] " Stephen Hemminger
2024-05-09 11:11 ` Daniel Gregory
2024-05-09 16:47 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2024-05-11 16:48 ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240503094605.GB3883350@ste-uk-lab-gw \
--to=daniel.gregory@bytedance.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=liangma@bytedance.com \
--cc=punit.agrawal@bytedance.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).