DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
Cc: <thomas@monjalon.net>, <dev@dpdk.org>, <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] cfgfile: enhance error detecting
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 14:40:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240704144055.524c65e0@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240220035840.32978-1-fengchengwen@huawei.com>

On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 03:58:36 +0000
Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com> wrote:

> When I was trying to debug a problem introduced by config.ini in
> test-dma-perf, I found the cfgfile library should enhance error
> detecting, so got this patchset.
> 
> Chengwen Feng (4):
>   cfgfile: remove dead code
>   cfgfile: support verify name and value
>   cfgfile: verify add section and entry result
>   cfgfile: add unique name flag
> 
>  lib/cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  lib/cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.h |  7 ++++
>  2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 


The existing cfgfile in DPDK is quite limited, and there are better
libraries available; not sure why a reinvention was necessary.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-04 21:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-20  3:58 Chengwen Feng
2024-02-20  3:58 ` [PATCH 1/4] cfgfile: remove dead code Chengwen Feng
2024-07-04 21:28   ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-02-20  3:58 ` [PATCH 2/4] cfgfile: support verify name and value Chengwen Feng
2024-07-04 21:29   ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-02-20  3:58 ` [PATCH 3/4] cfgfile: verify add section and entry result Chengwen Feng
2024-07-04 21:30   ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-02-20  3:58 ` [PATCH 4/4] cfgfile: add unique name flag Chengwen Feng
2024-07-04 21:36   ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-07-05  9:37     ` fengchengwen
2024-07-04 15:12 ` [PATCH 0/4] cfgfile: enhance error detecting David Marchand
2024-07-05  0:14   ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-07-05  0:29     ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-07-04 21:40 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2024-07-05  8:39   ` Bruce Richardson
2024-07-05  9:31 ` [PATCH v2 " Chengwen Feng
2024-07-05  9:31   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] cfgfile: remove dead code Chengwen Feng
2024-07-05  9:31   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] cfgfile: support verify name and value Chengwen Feng
2024-07-05  9:31   ` [PATCH v2 3/4] cfgfile: verify add section and entry result Chengwen Feng
2024-07-05  9:31   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] cfgfile: add strict parse flag Chengwen Feng
2024-09-06  1:03   ` [PATCH v2 0/4] cfgfile: enhance error detecting fengchengwen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240704144055.524c65e0@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).