From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1AD345594;
	Fri,  5 Jul 2024 11:17:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D4664330E;
	Fri,  5 Jul 2024 11:17:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.19])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7B21402DD
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  5 Jul 2024 11:17:38 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;
 d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel;
 t=1720171059; x=1751707059;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:
 references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=v54/Ge+gIA996n9wwTx7uPi7S+/OdkpaQmpYNKjQnls=;
 b=cCB6M5267rcMEitY28VwhuMnoGKfB/5cQEPf7lCRrNHsb+UslYMefw8Z
 Xho0E2l/O3tugHAATE/uYEve5ZGj913m/Sga6QOFAvHiFoaT5QzgXiTW3
 NhT/hCMEXCHEdx8p8wb/6BRq93J3N5Nv5VWdZkSI8keBI/Cdr1oErtHgg
 4iIXl9cet+zbDhRsYPdYDoBz2VJcZSnjd/YvnzJEluC8SodzIAqSYmyEM
 ExQKdNWkyD5ZQASRmVS1ZUaB47Ondgb+YbnXPJ1QEiZ52RrZpkcEuaspc
 qYZyFOG91Wm62TqXwZMgq7efH/a8i2aHyjCLP1wTAuqaW5u0hKQ2qYM8Y Q==;
X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: JevXgQJkR/iQgI9NKMR2vg==
X-CSE-MsgGUID: ONwJAPvxSdioj41f/+ycsg==
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11123"; a="17179053"
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,184,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="17179053"
Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147])
 by fmvoesa113.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
 05 Jul 2024 02:17:38 -0700
X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: XSg/DM/hRBuP8QHnFyEPIw==
X-CSE-MsgGUID: mRI4P8ClRxOvFgRwKG9EUw==
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,184,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="46719830"
Received: from unknown (HELO npf-hyd-clx-03..) ([10.145.170.182])
 by fmviesa007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Jul 2024 02:17:36 -0700
From: Soumyadeep Hore <soumyadeep.hore@intel.com>
To: bruce.richardson@intel.com,
	aman.deep.singh@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] Avoid rule duplication in CPFL PMD
Date: Fri,  5 Jul 2024 08:30:30 +0000
Message-ID: <20240705083032.2756071-1-soumyadeep.hore@intel.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0
In-Reply-To: <20240705050831.2639342-3-soumyadeep.hore@intel.com>
References: <20240705050831.2639342-3-soumyadeep.hore@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org

This patchset avoids flow rule duplication which was possible
previously in CPFL PMD.

---
v2:
* Addressed review comments
* Added Fixes tags
* Fixed CI warnings
---
v3:
* Addressed pending review comments
---

Soumyadeep Hore (2):
  net/cpfl: fix check for opcodes of received ctlq messages
  net/cpfl: fix +ve error codes for received ctlq messages

 drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_flow_engine_fxp.c |  2 +-
 drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_fxp_rule.c        | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
2.43.0