DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Itamar Gozlan <igozlan@nvidia.com>
To: <igozlan@nvidia.com>, <erezsh@nvidia.com>, <hamdani@nvidia.com>,
	<kliteyn@nvidia.com>, <valex@nvidia.com>,
	<viacheslavo@nvidia.com>, <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	<suanmingm@nvidia.com>, Dariusz Sosnowski <dsosnowski@nvidia.com>,
	Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com>, Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>,
	Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/8] net/mlx5/hws: strictly range templates check fix
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 15:30:58 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240709123103.2101902-4-igozlan@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240709123103.2101902-1-igozlan@nvidia.com>

Using range and non range templates is not allowed, and in HWS there is a
check that enforce that limitation with constantly check that, in a loop,
if the current template defined as range, the last one
should also be defined as range.
But, in the case where there are two templates in the following order:
(1) template with range, and (2) template without range.
The existing checks will not cover this case.
This commit fixes that hole by maintain the invariant that if a template
without a range exist, all the previous match template are also.

Fixes: 9732ffe13bd6 ("net/mlx5/hws: add range definer creation")
Cc: valex@nvidia.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Itamar Gozlan <igozlan@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/net/mlx5/hws/mlx5dr_definer.c | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/hws/mlx5dr_definer.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/hws/mlx5dr_definer.c
index 9ebda9267d..51a3f7be4b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/hws/mlx5dr_definer.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/hws/mlx5dr_definer.c
@@ -4041,15 +4041,18 @@ mlx5dr_definer_matcher_range_init(struct mlx5dr_context *ctx,
 
 	/* Create optional range definers */
 	for (i = 0; i < matcher->num_of_mt; i++) {
-		if (!mt[i].fcr_sz)
-			continue;
-
 		/* All must use range if requested */
-		if (i && !mt[i - 1].range_definer) {
+		bool is_range = !!mt[i].fcr_sz;
+		bool has_range = matcher->flags & MLX5DR_MATCHER_FLAGS_RANGE_DEFINER;
+
+		if (i && ((is_range && !has_range) || (!is_range && has_range))) {
 			DR_LOG(ERR, "Using range and non range templates is not allowed");
 			goto free_definers;
 		}
 
+		if (!mt[i].fcr_sz)
+			continue;
+
 		matcher->flags |= MLX5DR_MATCHER_FLAGS_RANGE_DEFINER;
 		/* Create definer without fcr binding, already binded */
 		mt[i].range_definer = mlx5dr_definer_alloc(ctx,
-- 
2.39.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-09 12:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-07 10:25 [PATCH 01/10] net/mlx5: add hairpin out of buffer counter Itamar Gozlan
2024-07-07 10:25 ` [PATCH 02/10] net/mlx5: fix matcher object memory leak Itamar Gozlan
2024-07-07 10:25 ` [PATCH 03/10] net/mlx5/hws: set eswitch owner vhc ID valid accordingly Itamar Gozlan
2024-07-07 10:25 ` [PATCH 04/10] net/mlx5/hws: fix memory leak in modify header free Itamar Gozlan
2024-07-07 10:25 ` [PATCH 05/10] net/mlx5/hws: strictly range templates check fix Itamar Gozlan
2024-07-07 10:25 ` [PATCH 06/10] net/mlx5/hws: fix deletion of action vport Itamar Gozlan
2024-07-07 10:25 ` [PATCH 07/10] net/mlx5/hws: fix incorrect port ID on root item convert Itamar Gozlan
2024-07-07 10:25 ` [PATCH 08/10] net/mlx5/hws: take out not needed variable Itamar Gozlan
2024-07-07 10:25 ` [PATCH 09/10] net/mlx5/hws: fix NAT64 csum issue Itamar Gozlan
2024-07-07 10:25 ` [PATCH 10/10] net/mlx5/hws: fix NA64 copy TOS field instead of TTL Itamar Gozlan
2024-07-09 12:30   ` [PATCH 0/8] HW steering team updates Itamar Gozlan
2024-07-09 12:30     ` [PATCH 1/8] net/mlx5/hws: set eswitch owner vhc ID valid accordingly Itamar Gozlan
2024-07-09 12:30     ` [PATCH 2/8] net/mlx5/hws: fix memory leak in modify header free Itamar Gozlan
2024-07-09 12:30     ` Itamar Gozlan [this message]
2024-07-09 12:30     ` [PATCH 4/8] net/mlx5/hws: fix deletion of action vport Itamar Gozlan
2024-07-09 12:31     ` [PATCH 5/8] net/mlx5/hws: fix incorrect port ID on root item convert Itamar Gozlan
2024-07-09 12:31     ` [PATCH 6/8] net/mlx5/hws: take out not needed variable Itamar Gozlan
2024-07-09 12:31     ` [PATCH 7/8] net/mlx5/hws: fix NAT64 csum issue Itamar Gozlan
2024-07-09 12:31     ` [PATCH 8/8] net/mlx5/hws: fix NA64 copy TOS field instead of TTL Itamar Gozlan
2024-07-09 15:25       ` Bing Zhao
2024-07-18  7:28     ` [PATCH 0/8] HW steering team updates Raslan Darawsheh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240709123103.2101902-4-igozlan@nvidia.com \
    --to=igozlan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bingz@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dsosnowski@nvidia.com \
    --cc=erezsh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=hamdani@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kliteyn@nvidia.com \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=orika@nvidia.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=suanmingm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=valex@nvidia.com \
    --cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).