DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
	David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>,
	Sivaprasad Tummala <sivaprasad.tummala@amd.com>,
	Tadhg Kearney <tadhg.kearney@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] power: fix number of uncore freqs
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 13:15:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240722201535.12522-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240721021806.67465-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>

The number of uncore frequencies was defined in three places,
and two of them were too small leading to test failures.
All places should be using RTE_MAX_UNCORE_FREQS.

Bugzilla ID: 1499
Fixes: 60b8a661a957 ("power: add Intel uncore frequency control")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---

v3 - restore one change lost in V2

 app/test/test_power_intel_uncore.c | 4 +---
 lib/power/power_intel_uncore.c     | 7 +++----
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_power_intel_uncore.c b/app/test/test_power_intel_uncore.c
index 80b45ce46e..049658627d 100644
--- a/app/test/test_power_intel_uncore.c
+++ b/app/test/test_power_intel_uncore.c
@@ -17,14 +17,12 @@ test_power_intel_uncore(void)
 #include <rte_power_uncore.h>
 #include <power_common.h>
 
-#define MAX_UNCORE_FREQS 32
-
 #define VALID_PKG 0
 #define VALID_DIE 0
 #define INVALID_PKG (rte_power_uncore_get_num_pkgs() + 1)
 #define INVALID_DIE (rte_power_uncore_get_num_dies(VALID_PKG) + 1)
 #define VALID_INDEX 1
-#define INVALID_INDEX (MAX_UNCORE_FREQS + 1)
+#define INVALID_INDEX (RTE_MAX_UNCORE_FREQS + 1)
 
 static int check_power_uncore_init(void)
 {
diff --git a/lib/power/power_intel_uncore.c b/lib/power/power_intel_uncore.c
index 9c152e4ed2..4eb9c5900a 100644
--- a/lib/power/power_intel_uncore.c
+++ b/lib/power/power_intel_uncore.c
@@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
 #include "power_intel_uncore.h"
 #include "power_common.h"
 
-#define MAX_UNCORE_FREQS 32
 #define MAX_NUMA_DIE 8
 #define BUS_FREQ     100000
 #define FILTER_LENGTH 18
@@ -32,7 +31,7 @@
 struct __rte_cache_aligned uncore_power_info {
 	unsigned int die;                  /* Core die id */
 	unsigned int pkg;                  /* Package id */
-	uint32_t freqs[MAX_UNCORE_FREQS];  /* Frequency array */
+	uint32_t freqs[RTE_MAX_UNCORE_FREQS]; /* Frequency array */
 	uint32_t nb_freqs;                 /* Number of available freqs */
 	FILE *f_cur_min;                   /* FD of scaling_min */
 	FILE *f_cur_max;                   /* FD of scaling_max */
@@ -51,7 +50,7 @@ set_uncore_freq_internal(struct uncore_power_info *ui, uint32_t idx)
 	uint32_t target_uncore_freq, curr_max_freq;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (idx >= MAX_UNCORE_FREQS || idx >= ui->nb_freqs) {
+	if (idx >= RTE_MAX_UNCORE_FREQS || idx >= ui->nb_freqs) {
 		POWER_LOG(DEBUG, "Invalid uncore frequency index %u, which "
 				"should be less than %u", idx, ui->nb_freqs);
 		return -1;
@@ -221,7 +220,7 @@ power_get_available_uncore_freqs(struct uncore_power_info *ui)
 	uint32_t i, num_uncore_freqs = 0;
 
 	num_uncore_freqs = (ui->init_max_freq - ui->init_min_freq) / BUS_FREQ + 1;
-	if (num_uncore_freqs >= MAX_UNCORE_FREQS) {
+	if (num_uncore_freqs >= RTE_MAX_UNCORE_FREQS) {
 		POWER_LOG(ERR, "Too many available uncore frequencies: %d",
 				num_uncore_freqs);
 		goto out;
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-22 20:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-21  2:18 [PATCH] " Stephen Hemminger
2024-07-22 15:57 ` [PATCH v2] " Stephen Hemminger
2024-07-22 20:15 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2024-07-23 11:40   ` [PATCH v3] " Hunt, David
2024-07-23 13:32     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240722201535.12522-1-stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=david.hunt@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=sivaprasad.tummala@amd.com \
    --cc=tadhg.kearney@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).