From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B320145761;
	Thu,  8 Aug 2024 00:24:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92C9A4066F;
	Thu,  8 Aug 2024 00:24:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-pg1-f174.google.com (mail-pg1-f174.google.com
 [209.85.215.174])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949C6402AD
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  8 Aug 2024 00:24:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-pg1-f174.google.com with SMTP id
 41be03b00d2f7-7c1f480593bso268440a12.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 07 Aug 2024 15:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1723069490;
 x=1723674290; darn=dpdk.org; 
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
 :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date
 :message-id:reply-to;
 bh=7s3xKFCAO5rCLjhsFNNfLSOe47esmogd8guqKDndVYs=;
 b=lTVYsoZG/eWbFyxwKYci9c8xvFVkZd9AkEq+ooYHxKmauyxOu10BYJB1qhOoL0LxAr
 CkzYYEn2enCYBn31gNAo787uTl8iriGKEr+DehtEAHCzHUMM+H9MAEy8pmxi/lAyIuGO
 j9coRHoY9b5kZYT5MV69RxUpIv8J92aWmi6/hrkOeLpMjbZmhQKIlReK67kS4u1YxI8x
 XV2FQ+rq5uWScp9Hj11lGZPsv66j8Vx/Vnk3KM/M0DbZNTBlGJX/DO7RlmRechU75I5T
 nkL58l9maFioqPvQ9D+oZ2+1d1HRSy9cT6t2t6qPdhLhIxJdjbeagDmbyonNsD6hWdzk
 hqfQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1723069490; x=1723674290;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
 :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
 :subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=7s3xKFCAO5rCLjhsFNNfLSOe47esmogd8guqKDndVYs=;
 b=MBPFP9GCqAT/k5BWV5C8EpnS/4Lsn2w3Rhc39vLsPTRITVUKYbn6TJbc0U+/nRHx4C
 szo1ANnOq1F5O2B+XECJByCtHbxoVe14Ku3OlY8as4AGQognknaGMqI9GIeSGTVC9nUr
 BKKd4RZZA/9BvWkQTp3RTZ0AJMXk/XC78gxJS2EYtLzD/GxSlR5Xcvot1nRlvqbaSfeo
 o6RUE5enXawj6SzxAHSwdxHR33bEEL+Xx/iEJDn3atRrFaUcUfIDewNtXUfVcppQ8cBC
 udUfpS6/IjhM8yG8Q+dblkF6whTtrtmQ/pEe3MA3NBTGMReexFEeXddn2QaZD/Cfdxk8
 02nQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy8PWjMjsJtKPA92Gagxu7H9WIP1SNSw6XoMznyEiGIhMNsv0Rc
 sb7GgW+9VaH/HALXiekmztJ1PjiMvC7iIJympYnPaffbRg0uL0PX+twegg3FTDE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFNoZ2Q0GwX8hvkWbfL0H0BWiIOts3Kbe7J+WFTyxT8lW1QUcGcWyIH61UDoHCX1LZuPyXhcw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:6b0a:b0:1c2:94ad:1c67 with SMTP id
 adf61e73a8af0-1c699563513mr20398129637.30.1723069490452; 
 Wed, 07 Aug 2024 15:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.local (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 d2e1a72fcca58-710cb2d090esm3194b3a.102.2024.08.07.15.24.50
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Wed, 07 Aug 2024 15:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 15:24:48 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>, Aaron
 Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] test: update alarm test
Message-ID: <20240807152448.48fc566c@hermes.local>
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8zZeq3kzUNKxCr_7=qyMVjdk+_iShp1ObgRYbLKLXk78A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20240718191049.84865-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
 <20240718191049.84865-2-stephen@networkplumber.org>
 <CAJFAV8zZeq3kzUNKxCr_7=qyMVjdk+_iShp1ObgRYbLKLXk78A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org

On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 14:45:45 +0200
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 9:11=E2=80=AFPM Stephen Hemminger
> <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> >
> > This test should be using the TEST_ASSERT macros, and can be
> > run as part of the fast test suite now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> =20
>=20
> [...]
>=20
> > +       ret =3D rte_eal_alarm_cancel(test_alarm_callback, NULL);
> > +       /* return is the number of the alarm set (or 0 if none or -1 if=
 error) */
> > +       TEST_ASSERT(ret > 0, "could not cancel an alarm: %d", ret);
> >
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > -REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(alarm_autotest, test_alarm);
> > +REGISTER_FAST_TEST(alarm_autotest, true, true, test_alarm); =20
>=20
> This test was removed from the fast-tests list as it was triggering
> false failures in some CI.
> ee00af60170b ("test: remove strict timing requirements some tests")
>=20
>=20

Maybe test can be fixed to use different time values.
Or like lcore tests, some yielding is needed.