From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59CBD4576E;
	Thu,  8 Aug 2024 20:52:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2789E4278D;
	Thu,  8 Aug 2024 20:52:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-pf1-f180.google.com (mail-pf1-f180.google.com
 [209.85.210.180])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E704066F
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  8 Aug 2024 20:52:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-pf1-f180.google.com with SMTP id
 d2e1a72fcca58-7106e2d0ec1so1147204b3a.2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 08 Aug 2024 11:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1723143148;
 x=1723747948; darn=dpdk.org; 
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
 :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date
 :message-id:reply-to;
 bh=43FtneV2vAWevqfY+SMC7mHPsoS2oawxkdj0vLRv2wI=;
 b=GOsVWAC5yP7o8lm5cdS52/L2Bj+Mei4wfnz4T0PoVy3YCdS5e7U7T+lwkmIKTp/G0u
 uo6eQ9KH6xXwB3dDIAOk7Ax1CjyXKTS4bfjmlhbLwnFRcffma3K4uf/a87mju+GS9/s8
 N2B05DU565gnRkexjREAfGz4mDS9XkV5IFzy+iksUeSWjJSwT4iWhxBkLgqNP+1LmeXL
 g1PnuikIzIijuDX+g1l70HHwCTN5J8zLy0j+bMaw5PkP3AIUlok+LMeLcF9iShf0Wp24
 0MX9nQThdth2SGzxzyA20Kqjg5LG5kf+2AgEfZfJU7XpAZFbyO30/O63pc2Yyzfd+X1c
 sEEA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1723143148; x=1723747948;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
 :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
 :subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=43FtneV2vAWevqfY+SMC7mHPsoS2oawxkdj0vLRv2wI=;
 b=XpSAwJiW3Jxk/1IEfwoGsxe9QTdbJZb46gNntaoN6LY9EoX4zuFYrQGnvuknJPyhwB
 WGDe7Tm/9EMf95j7EdNbWEc9E/xVYGBvt6cJVtMAkLYmLH6NLviRI7nyGnR8hlhkr+GV
 TuaeshL4aTD1OFxJbJhfKcUeFG18yLu6XQ+Dh+D/6NdXjCK9MM7GgeCf7Cx9SoXD6fck
 l/FdTpQa0BORsxv0gcdH2v/xs7WovI+S9M9zTatx9RCMZb6EnXmEJ0F5s9PVnkdH9NZe
 KtVZOLlVwHj0VHyJWWpMroxoJVMALkfUUHGzuFSDw0l8gMYo+Jm4yQvyFe2LLaML9BOt
 GR8Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxYJ9ByoT2YKedxB08Cf20+KCgsoKwWXqf3UtRT/1XtE+lAooP4
 0gT8esinw5jLXmW5IFmg8MQ6gqNbDpP68RlEVBb4ctowNg2ANtfHWfNodY7hAU8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEyX+x/DlVleskdudCaFly6iFt/VyKXeOQPCS4zEbRdUOI7BUq5xzdpYUVJ5vO09WE+8iOD0w==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:3e20:b0:70d:281d:ee78 with SMTP id
 d2e1a72fcca58-710cad6b960mr3347707b3a.10.1723143148513; 
 Thu, 08 Aug 2024 11:52:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.local (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 d2e1a72fcca58-710cb2d352esm1424978b3a.123.2024.08.08.11.52.27
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Thu, 08 Aug 2024 11:52:28 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 11:52:23 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>, Aaron
 Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] test: update alarm test
Message-ID: <20240808115223.6d5ac846@hermes.local>
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8zZeq3kzUNKxCr_7=qyMVjdk+_iShp1ObgRYbLKLXk78A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20240718191049.84865-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
 <20240718191049.84865-2-stephen@networkplumber.org>
 <CAJFAV8zZeq3kzUNKxCr_7=qyMVjdk+_iShp1ObgRYbLKLXk78A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org

On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 14:45:45 +0200
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 9:11=E2=80=AFPM Stephen Hemminger
> <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> >
> > This test should be using the TEST_ASSERT macros, and can be
> > run as part of the fast test suite now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> =20
>=20
> [...]
>=20
> > +       ret =3D rte_eal_alarm_cancel(test_alarm_callback, NULL);
> > +       /* return is the number of the alarm set (or 0 if none or -1 if=
 error) */
> > +       TEST_ASSERT(ret > 0, "could not cancel an alarm: %d", ret);
> >
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > -REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(alarm_autotest, test_alarm);
> > +REGISTER_FAST_TEST(alarm_autotest, true, true, test_alarm); =20
>=20
> This test was removed from the fast-tests list as it was triggering
> false failures in some CI.
> ee00af60170b ("test: remove strict timing requirements some tests")

I can see why that test failed (too short an alarm), but the whole test has=
 lots
of other issues. Starting new series to address.