From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Revert "test/alarm: disable bad time cases on Windows"
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 07:59:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240809075930.2b8dee58@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240809102324.154920fc@sovereign>
On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 10:23:24 +0300
Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2024-08-08 12:46 (UTC-0700), Stephen Hemminger:
> > This reverts commit a089d320338d708f5b7126dab5fd6861c82e6347.
> >
> > Windows EAL should have been fixed rather than papering over
> > the bug.
>
> Linux and FreeBSD alarm implementations use the same approach
> that limits possible timeout range in API.
> Test cases in question check that these values are rejected.
> Windows EAL can accept any values.
That was a bug. There should not be different behavior
on different OS.
> I think the proper fix would be documenting Unix limitations
> at API level (it never worked the other way, so no real breakage),
> then adding the same checks to Windows EAL only for consistency.
No. All EAL should behave the same.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-09 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-08 19:46 [PATCH 0/5] alarm related patches Stephen Hemminger
2024-08-08 19:46 ` [PATCH 1/5] eal: add missing parameter check to rte_eal_alarm_set on Windows Stephen Hemminger
2024-08-08 19:46 ` [PATCH 2/5] Revert "test/alarm: disable bad time cases on Windows" Stephen Hemminger
2024-08-09 7:23 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2024-08-09 7:33 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2024-08-09 14:59 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2024-08-08 19:46 ` [PATCH 3/5] test: support alarm test on FreeBSD Stephen Hemminger
2024-08-08 19:47 ` [PATCH 4/5] test/alarm: rewrite the alarm test Stephen Hemminger
2024-08-08 19:47 ` [PATCH 5/5] eal: simplify eal alarm cancel by using LIST_FOREACH_SAFE Stephen Hemminger
2024-08-09 8:33 ` Morten Brørup
2024-08-09 15:00 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-08-09 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] alarm test fixes Stephen Hemminger
2024-08-09 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] eal: add missing parameter check to rte_eal_alarm_set on Windows Stephen Hemminger
2024-08-09 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] test: support alarm test on FreeBSD Stephen Hemminger
2024-08-09 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] test/alarm: rewrite the alarm test Stephen Hemminger
2024-09-23 2:17 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] alarm test fixes fengchengwen
2024-10-04 11:58 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240809075930.2b8dee58@hermes.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
--cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).