From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E192457A1; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 16:55:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1097E402BB; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 16:55:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pf1-f175.google.com (mail-pf1-f175.google.com [209.85.210.175]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279E94014F for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 16:55:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf1-f175.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-70d23caf8ddso4026270b3a.0 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 07:55:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1723474541; x=1724079341; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=CqexEzItfxRVUVq4g8zpXA0ghOHURYTG7ctfAKA+1dU=; b=vMZpvw4kMkmbw3GhrTZvWw6BNz9KOUj0wJgjU1DfiDaRyjlgHgDNGYL/2RVY3853/6 AYRSrXoFDX7JMvLFOWKkLm2MreKjkOyIHaauR9UTw7pci0BdNXf3BFmo1FbS2gkCdkO1 7W/VvSaK8lCYEVbSrnP52IrfWlv+744WH9hJ1dznNIbNkzXMEy/3ij0nFJws17mcqsey U8OsLsRGFDTxWAYiR1oFCckf2NX6TM2okGzkcZ04rBIUINYNWDSeE9W9rVDhZtDx4NT7 zRONTd1ED1oUJg4YgcDTJ7dRZLaRTlDdXWDPKFni80d+h3KXD96P1PL+Yc1PkaW/H02A tEww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1723474541; x=1724079341; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CqexEzItfxRVUVq4g8zpXA0ghOHURYTG7ctfAKA+1dU=; b=HTM+rt+18y7fLJa48vOzzdMImU+AidNbJpqoJ0gtbPIH7wG7QpHGn4Sd6S7w6MRoF3 rnDDnI1jgVzdV0jOdNCbHkJBt0dRprawsO/lrnBW8wCX3Xvhry6FEMXXCG6o5e169rfK 9CwuDv9eg4Ts0pCb7brey6iSzYMeT49aoxMDY8jvom6iiO31qcMFfr414dX918U7lGiM 4K/nyExxR2Tz6aY3qCg+8nq1YpvEV1BCWI1Z3eZLKIvFKDLBsjNqcrvZVZEJWdLj6XaR vaaJ1ufzhK4lYE581NwSDJCC+UwgddFfGDMWd17VXsSvW1wVkTyoQkv2dpYkkH7QM8kH O+aA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy1x4DeDdtHzK5+6Yz1d5Db8A4pAqSiiGIk/F/DEkIKEfXivROt GlNcpwfuZYe+U4sg5BmnB9ICedmkR2wn8kOLjNrol4F0FewB2VIj+h7k5KykQvpPhnDnfm4ri67 2 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFVkF1D9HI3QC4NP29sw1j1pWvCkwoktKGCcrt5gRfBHAmVp1JyKXlA/nE1e2ZnysNjLt4/ZA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:9214:b0:1c4:818c:299d with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-1c8d7444df8mr791022637.11.1723474541008; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 07:55:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 41be03b00d2f7-7c3dbd54255sm4443456a12.0.2024.08.12.07.55.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 12 Aug 2024 07:55:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 07:55:39 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: =?UTF-8?B?546L6aKi?= Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: Inquiry Regarding Sending Patches to DPDK Message-ID: <20240812075539.20a77c1c@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <992435800910458fbf93a7c59ff454fc@realsil.com.cn> References: <992435800910458fbf93a7c59ff454fc@realsil.com.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 07:52:39 +0000 =E7=8E=8B=E9=A2=A2 wrote: > Dear all, >=20 > I hope this message finds you well. >=20 > I would like to seek your advice on an issue I've encountered. Our compan= y has recently enabled two-factor authentication (2FA) for our email accoun= ts. The IT department has suggested that I abandon using the "git send-emai= l" method, as configured through git config, to send patches to DPDK. Inste= ad, they have recommended using "Exchange anonymous send mail." However, I = believe this approach might not be feasible. >=20 > I wanted to confirm this with you and see if you could provide any guidan= ce on the matter. I look forward to your response. >=20 > Thank you very much for your time and assistance. >=20 > Best regards, > Howard Wang There are two issues here: Using git send-email is not required. You can generate patch files and put = them in your email. BUT Microsoft Exchange does not preserve text formatting in messages. Any p= atches sent that way are usually corrupted. At Microsoft, we ended up using a special server (not Exchange) to send Lin= ux and DPDK patches. Or using non-corporate accounts.