From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F1E457E5; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 16:20:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6A67427C7; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 16:20:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qt1-f175.google.com (mail-qt1-f175.google.com [209.85.160.175]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9733740B9E for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 16:20:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qt1-f175.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-454b3d8999aso877861cf.1 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 07:20:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1723818014; x=1724422814; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=u6SrGEi6bIRsbtnFGMufq4ZugeRf5QmwubGyDmPjUF0=; b=hVsEYD8njPbvaYHihuylZWcf+TTCeZ5GeJ8B5YMGazfKJ6JQIjmw0r0clLiLt4qkZM eHwxKk6o3atxFJ9WZ4A015oLE1arRQFBDBhRSvej3LOtboJELmaugUQb2i8w8I8IGrJl 8QbDXa7rQLij0mZfYhNx7JTSDA0tB1u8vg67A= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1723818014; x=1724422814; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=u6SrGEi6bIRsbtnFGMufq4ZugeRf5QmwubGyDmPjUF0=; b=omrKdW0kYpEKFHlPjlSFopD6t8mOf52biOQ+oVmvO+ovmKKOaSiUnRx1xVf1irPXA7 BFZRs4V7znDgWnXgGlCjxI96tiFw6POGObA9N9j+LMQpzY/N2Buas9osCAUzmploaaRn Y8bA55OGmPRk+HpINh9JeVeyXfTDI6ufWJLwjqzy2/Cn47UIy9khC02ySYzxP9pHU4sW mz2F3L60NQJ8U/arESt+xMRUA0f10/bYlW+PcOmNFsjKA1XbQ2wNXTvCicd7DSZi4A4y ELo253YykNgihEB2agyZOmovptgMoP721TBjVQem702zZDZWEodvORt1YaRaDa4J9L/Z Cz4g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YytnWnniq6zV8if9qy8w2JeQ6KO7tc9VUMXj+QFoxI69xPXvbai QF30qlcUxniORKDtwxSot5rDDs7S/pi1IQjbxHy5MsErxgj2K4vnu4lvV7U8jJI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGcfWx375zTtJdFd4BIoED+uPVB9pH3uNDJjZsXT8/vmfZmlHgBIE8wHyOXy4eoYxzdnO9aTg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:2b48:b0:453:1554:c49d with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-4537430665dmr40719941cf.37.1723818013548; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 07:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dean-laptop.hsd1.nh.comcast.net ([2601:188:cd7e:6880::fcf1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d75a77b69052e-4536a07837esm16422461cf.91.2024.08.16.07.20.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 16 Aug 2024 07:20:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Dean Marx To: probb@iol.unh.edu, npratte@iol.unh.edu, jspewock@iol.unh.edu, luca.vizzarro@arm.com, yoan.picchi@foss.arm.com, Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com, paul.szczepanek@arm.com, juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Dean Marx Subject: [PATCH v1 0/2] dts: port over checksum offload suite Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 10:20:29 -0400 Message-ID: <20240816142031.15150-1-dmarx@iol.unh.edu> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.44.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Port over checksum hardware offload testing suite from old DTS. The suite verifies the ability of the PMD to recognize whether an incoming packet has valid or invalid L4/IP checksum values. v1: In the original test plan, there were two Tx checksum test cases. I removed them due to the lack of consistency in testpmd with Tx checksum flags, either not being displayed during packet transmission or showing values that did not align with the original test plan. Dean Marx (2): dts: add csum HW offload to testpmd shell dts: checksum offload test suite dts/framework/remote_session/testpmd_shell.py | 124 +++++++++ dts/tests/TestSuite_checksum_offload.py | 255 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 379 insertions(+) create mode 100644 dts/tests/TestSuite_checksum_offload.py -- 2.44.0