From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D17245823; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 17:54:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0351D406B7; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 17:54:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pl1-f170.google.com (mail-pl1-f170.google.com [209.85.214.170]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB1B4025F for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 17:54:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pl1-f170.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-201f7fb09f6so40006485ad.2 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 08:54:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1724169285; x=1724774085; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=AXnnTe1aZVaSKCJHvlr+Mf7UnHpgAB1TsoZpxrMNj3A=; b=I88Ajb46OcwJ/P+R0wKzN2OvGwxvJ/bBEsgyxxvWalmz4vRGxMzOVz9g4iMO1MsGoR 6P5BRyxapm23RviFSoj/JICtvJYrnuaUUPiaAA8QZjn9xN3Mphy0gXczvChwPGSTLZnt yDToM7z5Ksy1INTw1OlvBG53FFfasjKqi6Uc5SVp53B9IIDRMNzuE+pmd55YMG/obW0b CWx8+z3ZvgER3AEu5DMsZ3cYROhsyLBEpgwYVk3A+y6K+GuvRfDQ/G1Vx+phMHbCwteS kiu7bFkA9qPV9BPnh2rFUKV4Mkmv/HW7iCzaGIn7od6djO745Lzuge8QWiEUGPn2wa9I OcMg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1724169285; x=1724774085; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AXnnTe1aZVaSKCJHvlr+Mf7UnHpgAB1TsoZpxrMNj3A=; b=N51ibhZwpNma5otbDT65zQ6sRj5Jyf17G/xHzMPZhWU1Da1lyWSjlrXYDJEqESbrMB fqFw+97l3qe2BHnfT/HFSZ51TrbxwX/4Q2L3vlvf5iIhjxdsWADRjAn+DdYvWE2g/IqG 1HoI91Miltgjp5GyuUCnxgaQ46fuxOnwfr6Hj485HHCYEfZ4bEAWz9EC8Ztm9O33rUTy MkOPwFD0+iNcUDraNp1Invard24hExBTIKdmiS/YTA2Quq0gda1kuLldCjdstd5HtzSP 1TflEFp8OS86fTgnmTlUjocqgKp2WHNGW9vQiveNiEXARLn98H7+1YObG7Z5uj/qNV3F iWdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxhlFnZ7tv41N4/o8R/cdK1YLCPu1oJVkGPyO3MpB2qMWZ/hPAp CcO2FhP6d2SSx2kKASo2KOaZtUYLJe1qUlMnViKlOLSs5HdfPeBeMsYTTneqw8Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEOT8/8D9tbNcV5/jCMt08tgsnYIEttWaHNUJK98k5wDQb1M+qgGOZyg5utOXQj0oXX1aYdeA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2342:b0:1fd:6c5b:afcc with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20203e6f770mr124240235ad.8.1724169285127; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 08:54:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-201f02faa77sm79563125ad.58.2024.08.20.08.54.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 20 Aug 2024 08:54:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 08:54:43 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> To: Alex Chapman <alex.chapman@arm.com> Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>, Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>, Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com, Paul.Szczepanek@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] test-pmd: add more packet verbose decode options Message-ID: <20240820085443.121b024e@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <b326ba80-0bef-498a-92f5-549d72b8e10f@arm.com> References: <20240312220129.70667-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20240802195824.1336603-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20240802195824.1336603-5-stephen@networkplumber.org> <b326ba80-0bef-498a-92f5-549d72b8e10f@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 14:42:56 +0100 Alex Chapman <alex.chapman@arm.com> wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > I have gone through your patch series and the hexdump option would be > quite valuable for use in DTS. > > However I am currently facing the issue of distinguishing noise packets > from intentional packets within the verbose output. Prior to your patch, > the intention was to use the Layer 4 port to distinguish between them, > however with the hexdump option, the plan is to now use a custom payload. > > The one issue is that with verbose level 5 does not print the required > RSS hash and RSS queue information. The queue is there, in the output. Not sure if the hash matters. I wanted to keep to tshark format as much as possible. For DTS, maybe having a yet another JSON verbose format would be best. Something with mbuf bits in JSON.