From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Ric Li <ming3.li@intel.com>
Cc: dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com, dev@dpdk.org,
roretzla@linux.microsoft.com,
Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] windows/virt2phys: fix block MDL not updated
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 16:04:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241015160446.1928c2df@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231204103214.2504017-1-ming3.li@intel.com>
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 18:32:14 +0800
Ric Li <ming3.li@intel.com> wrote:
> The virt2phys_translate function previously scanned existing blocks,
> returning the physical address from the stored MDL info if present.
> This method was problematic when a virtual address pointed to a freed
> and reallocated memory segment, potentially changing the physical
> address mapping. Yet, virt2phys_translate would consistently return
> the originally stored physical address, which could be invalid.
>
> This issue surfaced when allocating a memory region larger than 2MB
> using rte_malloc. This action would allocate a new memory segment
> and use virt2phy to set the IOVA. The driver would store the MDL
> and lock the pages initially. When this region was freed, the memory
> segment used as a whole page could be freed, invalidating the virtual
> to physical mapping. Before this fix, the driver would only return the
> initial physical address, leading to illegal IOVA for some pages when
> allocating a new memory region larger than the hugepage size (2MB).
>
> To address this, a function to check block physical address has been
> added. If a block with the same base address is detected in the
> driver's context, the MDL's physical address is compared with the real
> physical address. If they don't match, the block is removed and a new
> one is created to store the correct mapping. To make the removal action
> clear, the list to store MDL blocks is changed to a double linked list.
>
> Also fix the printing of PVOID type.
>
> Bugzilla ID: 1201
> Bugzilla ID: 1213
>
> Signed-off-by: Ric Li <ming3.li@intel.com>
This looks ok, but I know nothing about windows drivers.
Could we get a review by Dmitry?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-15 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-11 8:22 [PATCH] " Ric Li
2023-09-11 13:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Ric Li
2023-09-11 21:50 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2023-09-12 11:13 ` Li, Ming3
2023-09-12 11:17 ` [PATCH v3] " Ric Li
2023-11-27 1:31 ` Li, Ming3
2023-11-30 4:10 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2023-12-04 10:22 ` [PATCH v4] " Ric Li
2023-12-04 10:32 ` Ric Li
2024-10-15 23:04 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2024-10-16 6:32 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2024-11-20 12:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-09-12 12:18 ` [PATCH v2] " Dmitry Kozlyuk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241015160446.1928c2df@hermes.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
--cc=ming3.li@intel.com \
--cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).